United States v. Acevedo-Ramos
Decision Date | 21 December 1984 |
Docket Number | Crim. No. 84-373 HL. |
Parties | UNITED STATES of America, v. Hector ACEVEDO-RAMOS, Defendant. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Puerto Rico |
Luis Carbone, Luis F. Abreu Elias, Hato Rey, P.R., William M. Kunstler, Ronald L. Kuby, New York City, for defendant.
Daniel F. Lopez Romo, U.S. Atty., Hato Rey, P.R., for United States.
Defendant Héctor Acevedo-Ramos was indicted and arrested on November 15, 1984, with other five defendants. Defendant was charged on a two count indictment with conspiracy to delay and affect commerce by robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951, and with the substantive offense of robbery of approximately 770 diamonds from Taillex Corporation, valued at $620,918, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2. The offenses carry a maximum penalty of twenty years imprisonment and/or a $10,000 fine in each count.
The Government sought, and, after a full hearing held on November 19, 21, and 26, 1984 before Magistrate Arenas obtained, defendant's preventive detention pursuant to the Bail Reform Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. § 3141 et seq., effective on October 12, 1984. The detention order, filed on November 26, 1984, contains written findings of fact and the reasons for detention as mandated by Section 3142(i).1 On November 28, another Opinion and Order, on reconsideration, was filed by the Magistrate, reaffirming his prior detention order. On December 6, defendant filed a "Notice of Appeal", which the Court entertained and set for hearing on December 12th, as a motion for revocation or amendment of a detention order. 18 U.S.C. § 3145(b).2 Simultaneous briefs were ordered to be filed, and thereafter the matter was submitted on December 14, 1984, upon defendant's supplemental brief.
Defendant claims that the detention order should be set aside and defendant released on bail, on the grounds that (1) Section 3142 of the Bail Reform Act is facially unconstitutional, and deprives defendant of due process of law, (2) pretrial detention as authorized by the Act violates the Eighth Amendment, and (3) the findings of the Magistrate that defendant is a danger to the Government witnesses and to the community, and that there is serious risk that he will obstruct or attempt to obstruct justice, are not supported by "clear and convincing evidence."
The Bail Reform Act of 1984, Chapter II of the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984, Public Law No. 98-473, was Congress' response to the flaws in the pretrial release system created by the Bail Reform Act of 1966. Congress found that there was a widespread pattern of serious crimes being committed by persons on pretrial release. See, S.Rep. No. 225, 98th Cong., 2nd Session 6 (1984); S.Rep. No. 147, 98th Cong., 1st Sess. 22-30 (1983); S.Rep. No. 317, 97th Cong., 2nd Sess. 27-35 (1982); 130 Cong.Rec. S4109, daily ed. Jan. 20, 1984 (remarks of Sen. Thurmond); id. at S537, daily ed. Jan. 31, 1984 (remarks of Sen. Mitchell); id. at S945 (daily ed. Feb. 3, 1984 (remarks of Sen. Hatch). The Act reflects congressional concern with the alarming problem of crimes committed by persons on release and with the inadequate authority of the courts to make release decisions that give appropriate recognition to the danger a person may pose to others, to the community or to the administration of justice. Senator Mitchell remarked:
Id. at S939 (daily ed. Feb. 3, 1984.)
The applicable provisions governing these proceedings are set forth below:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
U.S. v. Perry
...United States v. Kouyoumdjian, 601 F.Supp. 1506, 1511 (C.D.Ca.1985) (upholding Bail Reform Act of 1984); United States v. Acevedo-Ramos, 600 F.Supp. 501, 507 (D. Puerto Rico 1984) (upholding Bail Reform Act of 1984), aff'd, 755 F.2d 203 (1st Cir.1985). The exception is the United States Cou......
-
United States v. Fernandez-Aviles
...without bond. 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e). United States v. Agosto–Vives, 757 F.Supp.2d 110, 111 (D.P.R.2010) ; see United States v. Acevedo–Ramos, 600 F.Supp. 501, 503 (D.P.R.1984).The preliminary and detention hearings were held yesterday, June 23, 2014. The evidence revealed that then Sergeant J......
-
U.S. v. Al-Azzawy
...600 F.Supp. 164, 168 (N.D.Cal.1985); United States v. Resek, 602 F.Supp. 1126, 1129 (S.D.N.Y.1985); United States v. Acevedo-Ramos, 600 F.Supp. 501, 506, 510 (D.Puerto Rico 1984), aff'd, 755 F.2d 203 (1st The Bail Reform Act does not permit a waiver of time requirements by the defendant. Co......
-
United States v. Jittaphol
...but less than beyond a reasonable doubt." In re Pratt, 462 F.3d 14, 21 (1st Cir. 2006) ; see also United States v. Acevedo-Ramos, 600 F. Supp. 501, 509 (D.P.R. 1984), aff'd, 755 F.2d 203 (1st Cir. 1985). Under § 3148(b)(2), "a district court's finding that a defendant will not abide by any ......