United States v. American Stevedores, Inc.

Decision Date14 November 1962
Docket NumberNo. 82,Docket 27649.,82
Citation310 F.2d 47
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. AMERICAN STEVEDORES, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit

John T. Reges, Washington, D. C. (Julius G. Hirsch, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellant.

Sheldon H. Elsen, Asst. U. S. Atty. for Southern District of New York (Vincent L. Broderick, U. S. Atty. for Southern District of New York, on the brief; Martin R. Gold, and Arthur I. Rossett, Asst. U. S. Attys., of counsel), for appellee.

Before CLARK, MOORE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Certiorari Denied January 21, 1963. See 83 S.Ct. 552.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, American Stevedores, Inc., a family-owned corporation, appeals from its conviction for willfully failing to report corporate income and for evading and defeating the taxes thereon in violation of Int.Rev.Code of 1939 § 145(b); 26 U.S.C.A. § 7201. Appellant and its four sole stockholders, all brothers, three of whom were its principal directors, officers, and operators, were tried before a jury which acquitted the stockholders but convicted appellant. A fifth individual, the president of appellant and father of the stockholders, moved for, and was granted, a severance because of ill health. He has not been tried to date.

Appellant claims on appeal that the acquittal of appellant's principal operators precluded and/or made inconsistent the jury's conviction of appellant on these same charges.

We find no merit in this contention. The record shows ample grounds upon which the jury could have consistently arrived at both verdicts. The jury could have found that the tax frauds were committed on behalf of appellant by its comptroller, Walter Gans, acting within the scope of his employment. United States v. Steiner Plastics Mfg. Co., 2 Cir., 1956, 231 F.2d 149, 153; United States v. George F. Fish, Inc., 2 Cir., 1946, 154 F.2d 798; cert. denied 328 U.S. 869, 66 S.Ct. 1377, 90 L.Ed. 1639 (1946). Gans, an employee of many years' standing, was appellant's internal accountant; as such he was given absolute discretion and authority over appellant's books. The personal expenses of the stockholders, carried on the books as corporate expenses and deducted in reporting its tax liability as business deductions, in part formed the basis of the violations charged. Appellant's contention that Gans did not have sufficient authority to bind appellant to a criminal act is belied by the affirmative evidence indicating that he had "carte blanche" over all financial matters. Appellant, by its directors, having given Gans such authority, may very well have been found to have condoned his illegal treatment of these items for their benefit. The effect of such condonation is not dissipated by appellant's use of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Com. v. Beneficial Finance Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • 4 Noviembre 1971
    ...managers and supervisors--conspiracy to fix the prices of bakery products in the Memphis area--Sherman Act); United States v. American Stevedores, Inc., 310 F.2d 47, 48 (2d Cir.), cert. den. 371 U.S. 969, 83 S.Ct. 552, 9 L.Ed.2d 539 (comptroller--tax evasion); Steere Tank Lines, Inc. v. Uni......
  • Westinghouse Elec. Supply Co. v. Healy Corp.
    • United States
    • Appeals Court of Massachusetts
    • 31 Enero 1977
    ... ... The HEALY CORPORATION ... MAPLEWOOD YARN MILLS, INC ... Richard LEVIN et al ... Appeals Court of ... 1939). Brennan v. United Fruit Co., 108 F.2d 710 (5th Cir. 1940). Pang-Tsu Mow v ... 131, 220 F.2d 811 (1954). United States v. Bowen, 310 F.2d 45, 47 (5th Cir. 1962). Olympic Ins ... American Airlines, Inc., 5 Cir. 1970, 422 F.2d 350, 351.' 531 F.2d ... ...
  • United States v. Hilton Hotels Corporation
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 15 Enero 1973
    ...the conspiracy. A fortiori, it is irrelevant that the employee was charged with the offense and acquitted. United States v. American Stevedore, Inc., 310 F.2d 47, 48-49 (2d Cir.1962); Magnolia Motor & Logging Co. v. United States, 264 F.2d 950, 953 (9th Cir.1959); United States v. General M......
  • US v. LBS Bank-New York, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • 25 Julio 1990
    ...Inc., 728 F.2d 682, 688 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 881, 105 S.Ct. 246, 83 L.Ed.2d 184 (1984); United States v. American Stevedores, Inc., 310 F.2d 47, 48-49 (2nd Cir.1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 969, 83 S.Ct. 552, 9 L.Ed.2d 539 (1963); Magnolia Motor & Logging Co. v. United Sta......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Interest, Penalties, Tax Crimes & Offshore Accounts
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Divorce Taxation Content
    • 30 Abril 2022
    ...1991); Katz v. United States , 321 F.2d 7, 10 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 903 (1963); United States v. American Stevedores, Inc. , 310 F.2d 47, 48 (2d Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 969 (1963); United States v. Brill , 270 F.2d 525, 526 (3d Cir. 1959). 7. Sluicing off corporate i......
  • The Litigation Landscape of Fraternity and Sorority Hazing: Criminal and Civil Liability
    • United States
    • University of Nebraska - Lincoln Nebraska Law Review No. 99, 2021
    • Invalid date
    ...[47]Id. at 450 (citing United States v. Carter, 311 F.2d 934 (6th Cir. 1963)). [48]Id. (citing United States v. Am. Stevedores, Inc., 310 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. [49]Id. (citing United States v. George F. Fish, Inc., 154 F.2d 798 (2d Cir. 1946)). [50]Id. (citing C.I.T. Corp., 150 F.2d 85). [51]Id.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT