United States v. Armour
| Docket Number | 15-2170 |
| Decision Date | 01 November 2016 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
153 cases
-
United States v. Douglas
...of gender, and we will do the same.4 Some courts instead refer to this clause as the "elements clause." See, e.g., United States v. Armour, 840 F.3d 904, 907 (7th Cir. 2016).5 Some courts instead refer to this clause as the "risk-of-force clause." See, e.g., United States v. St. Hubert, 883......
-
Haynes v. United States
..., 71 F.3d 645, 662 (7th Cir. 1995) (noting separate special verdicts as to each charged act).3 Similarly, in United States v. Armour , 840 F.3d 904, 907–09 (7th Cir. 2017), we looked through a defendant’s conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2, the general aiding and abetting statute, and analyzed ......
-
United States v. Chagoya-Morales
...cmt. n.1(B)(iii).17 Appellant's Br. 22 n.6 (emphasis added) (quoting 720 ILCS 5/18-5(a) ).18 See United States v. Armour, 840 F.3d 904, 909 (7th Cir. 2016) (concluding that robbery by assault by a dangerous weapon or device under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(d) satisfies Johnson I ).19 Below, Mr. Chago......
-
Haynes v. United States
...approach, a court presumes "the conviction rested on the least serious acts that could satisfy the statute," United States v. Armour , 840 F.3d 904, 908 (7th Cir. 2016), and that the "least serious act" would be fear of injury to property. Rather than recapitulate the Petitioner's argument ......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
THE FEDERAL BANK ROBBERY ACT: WHY THE CURRENT SPLIT INVOLVING THE USE OF FORCE REQUIREMENT FOR ATTEMPTED BANK ROBBERY IS REALLY AN EXCEPTION.
...presence of another.'") (Westlaw through P.L. 115-281). (48) 18 U.S.C. [section]2113(aHb). (49) Id. (50) See e.g., United States v. Armour, 840 F.3d 904, 906 (7th Cir. 2016). (51) Prince v. United States, 352 U.S. 322, 328 (1957) ("It is a fair inference from the wording in the Act... that ......
