United States v. Basham, No. 13–9.

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
Writing for the CourtKING, Circuit Judge
Citation789 F.3d 358
Decision Date15 June 2015
Docket NumberNo. 13–9.
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Brandon Leon BASHAM, Defendant–Appellant.

789 F.3d 358

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee
v.
Brandon Leon BASHAM, Defendant–Appellant.

No. 13–9.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued: March 25, 2015.
Decided: June 15, 2015.


789 F.3d 361

ARGUED:Michael L. Burke, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Phoenix, Arizona, for Appellant. Thomas Ernest Booth, United States Department Of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. ON BRIEF:Jon M. Sands, Federal Public Defender, Sarah Stone, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Phoenix, Arizona, for Appellant. William N. Nettles, United States Attorney, Robert F. Daley, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Leslie R. Caldwell, Assistant Attorney General, Sung–Hee Suh, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge KING wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge TRAXLER and Judge AGEE joined.

KING, Circuit Judge:

In November 2002, Brandon Leon Basham and Chadrick Evan Fulks engaged in a seventeen-day multistate crime spree, for which they were both prosecuted. Basham was convicted in the District of South Carolina of multiple crimes and sentenced to death for two of them, carjacking resulting in death, in contravention of 18 U.S.C. § 2119(3), and kidnapping resulting in death, as proscribed by 18 U.S.C. § 1201. After we upheld Basham's convictions and death sentences on direct appeal, see United States v. Basham, 561 F.3d 302 (4th Cir.2009), cert. denied, 560 U.S. 938, 130 S.Ct. 3353, 176 L.Ed.2d 1245 (2010), he moved for habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. By its opinion of June 5, 2013, the district court denied Basham's § 2255 motion. See United States v. Basham, No. 4:02–cr–00992 (D.S.C. June 5, 2013), ECF No. 1577 (the “Opinion”). The court subsequently denied Basham's motion to alter or amend the judgment, made under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e), by way of its August 21, 2013 order. See United States v. Basham, No. 4:02–cr–00992 (D.S.C. Aug. 21, 2013), ECF No. 1583 (the “Reconsideration Order”).1 Basham now appeals from those decisions. As explained below, we reject Basham's assignments

789 F.3d 362

of error and affirm the judgment of the district court.

I.

A.

Our 2009 opinion disposing of Basham's direct appeal, authored by our distinguished former Chief Judge Karen Williams, detailed the pertinent facts of Basham's 2002 crime spree as follows:

In 2002, Basham, a lifelong Kentucky resident, was serving the final years of a felony forgery conviction sentence at the Hopkins County Detention Center in Kentucky. In October of that year, Chadrick Evan Fulks became Basham's new cellmate. In early November, Fulks was charged with an additional (and serious) state offense, first degree abuse of a child aged twelve years or younger. On November 4, 2002, Basham and Fulks escaped the detention center together by scaling a wall in the recreation area and leaving the area on foot.
By the evening of November 5, Basham and Fulks reached the home of James Hawkins in nearby Hanson, Kentucky. Basham approached the dwelling, knocked on the door, and asked to use the telephone. Basham told Hawkins that his car had broken down and, after Basham made two calls, Hawkins agreed to drive him to a nearby convenience store. When Basham and Hawkins left the residence, Fulks joined them and the three men left in Hawkins's truck. The two men then told Hawkins that their vehicle was disabled in Robards, Kentucky, and they asked for a ride. During the drive, Fulks told Hawkins that the disabled vehicle was actually in Indiana and directed Hawkins to drive there. Fulks later changed the directions again; by this point, Basham was pointing a knife at Hawkins to keep him driving to their preferred destination. At some point, Fulks took the wheel, drove the truck into a field, and ordered Basham to tie Hawkins to a tree. Fulks became dissatisfied with Basham's speed in tying and eventually completed the job himself. They left Hawkins clothed in shorts, flip-flops, and a short-sleeved vest. Fifteen hours later, Hawkins freed himself and flagged a passing motorist. When interviewed by police officers later that day, Hawkins identified Basham and Fulks as the individuals who kidnapped him.
After abandoning Hawkins, Fulks and Basham drove to Portage, Indiana, to visit one of Fulks's former girlfriends, Tina Severance. They abandoned Hawkins's vehicle at a hotel and walked to a trailer shared by Severance and her friend Andrea Roddy. The four then drove to a hotel in northern Indiana and stayed there for the next few days. At some point, Basham and Roddy began a consensual sexual relationship.
During their time in Indiana, Fulks asked Severance if she knew anyone from whom he could obtain firearms. Severance informed Fulks that a friend of hers, Robert Talsma, kept several firearms at his home; Severance and Roddy thereafter agreed to lure Talsma out of his house by offering to buy him breakfast. While Talsma was at breakfast with the women, Basham and Fulks entered Talsma's home and stole four firearms, a ring, and several blank checks. They then reunited with Severance and Roddy, and the four traveled in Severance's van to Sturgis, Michigan. That night, November 8, Basham and Roddy stayed at a hotel in Sturgis while Fulks and Severance drove to Goshen, Indiana, to smoke marijuana and methamphetamines with Fulks's brother, Ronnie Fulks.
789 F.3d 363
That evening, two police officers began knocking on doors at the hotel where Basham and Roddy were staying in Sturgis. Basham opened his room door, saw the officers, closed the door, and cocked a .22 caliber revolver that he had stolen from Talsma. The officers ended up leaving before reaching Basham's door. Basham told Roddy, however, “I was about to shoot me a mother-f* * *er cop right. I was going to blow the f* * *ing cop away.” The next morning, November 9, Basham and Roddy drove to a local Kmart to purchase sundries. Basham met a group of teenagers in the parking lot, and he reported to Roddy that they had some money and he wanted to kill them for it. After purchasing sundries with some of Talsma's stolen checks, Basham invited the teenagers back to the hotel room. Severance and Fulks arrived back at the hotel shortly thereafter, and the teenagers left. Fulks, Basham, Severance, and Roddy then drove Severance's van to the home of Fulks's brother, Ronnie Fulks, in Goshen, Indiana.
On November 10, 2002, the group of four drove to Piketon, Ohio, in Severance's van. Basham again used Talsma's checks to buy sundries, which Roddy later returned for cash. Basham and Fulks also bought two sets of camouflage clothing and Fulks stole a purse and cell phone from a Wal–Mart parking lot. On November 11, they drove to Kenova, West Virginia, near Huntington, and rented a hotel room. Fulks and Basham, wearing their sets of camouflage clothing, left the hotel room by themselves and did not return until the morning hours of November 12.
Samantha Burns, a nineteen-year-old Marshall University student, worked at the J.C. Penney's store in the Huntington Mall. In addition, Burns also participated in a school fundraiser by selling candy boxes, which she kept in her car. On November 11, Burns met her aunt at Penney's to purchase clothing for one of Burns's nieces; they parked in separate locations at the mall. At 9:46 p.m. that evening, Burns called her mother to say she was staying at a friend's house that night. Burns has never been seen since.
During the early morning hours of November 12, 2002, a local fire department responded to a reported explosion and fire at a rural area three miles outside of Huntington. The responding firemen found a car later identified as belonging to Burns burned out at a cemetery.
Meanwhile, Fulks and Basham returned to the hotel carrying muddy clothing, and Fulks indicated that they had stolen some money. Later that morning, the group of four checked out of the motel and drove to South Carolina, where Fulks had lived for several years in the 1990s. Several facts emerged linking Basham and Fulks to Burns's disappearance. Roddy and Severance reported seeing mud, as well as one of Burns's candy boxes, in the van. In addition, Basham began wearing a heart-shaped ring around his neck that belonged to Samantha Burns. Basham told the women that he had stolen the candy from a girl selling it and that he had stolen the ring from a car. Roddy also found Burns's photo ID discarded with other items linking Burns to Fulks and Basham. Moreover, it was later revealed that Fulks used Burns's ATM card twice on the evening of November 11 at local banks.
The evening of November 12, Fulks, Basham, Severance and Roddy arrived at a motel in Little River, South Carolina. The next day was a day of relative rest; Fulks and Basham stole several purses and wallets
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
59 practice notes
  • Gilbert v. U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives, Civil Action No. TDC–15–2127
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court (Maryland)
    • January 23, 2018
    ...such as suppressing exculpatory facts do not violate due process unless they render the result unfair); United States v. Basham , 789 F.3d 358, 376 (4th Cir. 2015) (holding that on a collateral attack, a criminal defendant asserting a due process violation must show a "reasonable probabilit......
  • United States v. Ziegler, No. 19-4832
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
    • June 14, 2021
    ...erred by not adequately considering his mental competency before granting his request to represent himself. See United States v. Basham , 789 F.3d 358, 379 (4th Cir. 2015) ("In a procedural claim ... the movant contends that the trial court failed to properly ensure that the accused was com......
  • Martin v. United States, Civil Action No. RDB-18-0103
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court (Maryland)
    • July 24, 2018
    ...Sixth Amendment guarantees reasonable competence, not perfect advocacy judged with the benefit of hindsight." United States v. Basham, 789 F. 3d 358, 371 (4th Cir. 2015). Here, Martin has not shown any evidence that his trial counsel's performance was "below an objective standard of reasona......
  • Pegues v. Kendall, C. A. 5:21-763-TMC-KDW
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court of South Carolina
    • November 4, 2021
    ...the court deciding the ineffectiveness claim to consider the totality of the evidence before the judge or jury.'' United States v. Basham, 789 F.3d 358, 371-72 (4th Cir. 2015) (quoting Elmore v. Ozmint, 661 F.3d 783, 858 (4th Cir. 2011)). In the context of a guilty plea, Applicant must show......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
60 cases
  • Gilbert v. U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives, Civil Action No. TDC–15–2127
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court (Maryland)
    • January 23, 2018
    ...such as suppressing exculpatory facts do not violate due process unless they render the result unfair); United States v. Basham , 789 F.3d 358, 376 (4th Cir. 2015) (holding that on a collateral attack, a criminal defendant asserting a due process violation must show a "reasonable probabilit......
  • United States v. Ziegler, No. 19-4832
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
    • June 14, 2021
    ...erred by not adequately considering his mental competency before granting his request to represent himself. See United States v. Basham , 789 F.3d 358, 379 (4th Cir. 2015) ("In a procedural claim ... the movant contends that the trial court failed to properly ensure that the accused was com......
  • Martin v. United States, Civil Action No. RDB-18-0103
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court (Maryland)
    • July 24, 2018
    ...Sixth Amendment guarantees reasonable competence, not perfect advocacy judged with the benefit of hindsight." United States v. Basham, 789 F. 3d 358, 371 (4th Cir. 2015). Here, Martin has not shown any evidence that his trial counsel's performance was "below an objective standard of reasona......
  • Pegues v. Kendall, C. A. 5:21-763-TMC-KDW
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court of South Carolina
    • November 4, 2021
    ...the court deciding the ineffectiveness claim to consider the totality of the evidence before the judge or jury.'' United States v. Basham, 789 F.3d 358, 371-72 (4th Cir. 2015) (quoting Elmore v. Ozmint, 661 F.3d 783, 858 (4th Cir. 2011)). In the context of a guilty plea, Applicant must show......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT