United States v. Bates, 75-3187 Summary Calendar.
Decision Date | 06 February 1976 |
Docket Number | No. 75-3187 Summary Calendar.,75-3187 Summary Calendar. |
Citation | 526 F.2d 966 |
Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frank BATES, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Floyd W. Freed, III, Donald W. Bankston, Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellant.
Edward B. McDonough, Jr., U.S. Atty., James R. Gough, Asst. U.S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG and DYER, Circuit Judges.
Frank Bates was convicted by a jury of the importation of 2,798 Ionamin capsules and 11 bottles of Robitussin A-C cough syrup, both controlled substances under 21 U.S.C. § 952(a), and of possession of the capsules with intent to distribute, a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). In this appeal he argues that he was the victim of an illegal search and thus that his motion to suppress the contraband should have been granted. We find that the challenged search was conducted lawfully and we affirm the conviction.
The district court made the following findings regarding the search:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
U.S. v. Warren
...that these actions were carried out jointly is sufficient to bring the agents under the aegis of the Coast Guard. See United States v. Bates, 526 F.2d 966 (5th Cir. 1976). We hold, therefore, that the participation by the agents in the boarding, interrogation, arrests, and seizures in this ......
-
U.S. v. Gurr
...People v. Villacrusis, 992 F.2d 886, 887 (9th Cir.1993); United States v. Carter, 592 F.2d 402, 406 (7th Cir.1979); United States v. Bates, 526 F.2d 966, 967 (5th Cir.1976). Gurr thus misstates the law in arguing that no case suggests that Customs officials may seize something that they do ......
-
United States v. Cano
...at the border where the officials had reason to suspect the computer carried child pornography); see also United States v. Bates , 526 F.2d 966, 967–68 (5th Cir. 1976) (per curiam) (upholding a search of the defendant’s vehicle after he had been arrested at the border for violating his bond......
-
United States v. Love
...whether the searches were permissible, was the existence of "reasonable suspicion" at the time of the search. In United States v. Bates, 526 F.2d 966 (5th Cir. 1976), the court ruled permissible the search of a car at an international bridge between the United States and Mexico. And in Unit......