United States v. Baur, 4431.

Decision Date19 April 1945
Docket NumberNo. 4431.,4431.
Citation60 F. Supp. 162
PartiesUNITED STATES v. BAUR.
CourtU.S. District Court — Western District of Pennsylvania

Gerald A. Gleeson, U. S. Atty., and James P. McCormick, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

J. Hibbs Buckman, of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

KALODNER, District Judge.

This is an action for a preliminary injunction brought by the United States of America to prevent and restrain violations of the Act of Congress of June 28, 1940, 54 Stat. 676, entitled "An Act To expedite national defense, and for other purposes", as amended by the Act of Congress of May 31, 1941, 55 Stat. 236, herein referred to as the "National Defense Act", 50 U.S. C.A.Appendix, § 1151 et seq., and as amended by the Act of Congress of March 27, 1942, 56 Stat. 176, entitled "An Act To further expedite the prosecution of the war", herein referred to as the "Second War Powers Act, 1942", 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 631 et seq., and of regulations and orders issued thereunder as hereinafter more fully set forth.

The jurisdiction of this court is based upon Section 24(1) of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 41(1), and the Second War Powers Act, 1942, mentioned above.

The sole question for determination is whether defendant delivered milk, cream and butterfat-in-cream, in excess of the quotas established by the said Food Orders Nos. 79 and 79.33 contrary to the provisions of the said Orders.

After consideration of the testimony and pleadings and the arguments of counsel, I make the following

Findings of Fact

1. The defendant, Philip Baur, doing business as Witchwood Dairy, was, and still is, engaged in the handling of milk, milk by-products and cream, at Spring House, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, and is a "handler" as that term is defined in paragraph (a) (2) of War Food Order No. 79.

2. The War Food Administrator, pursuant to authority vested in him, issued War Food Order No. 79, effective September 10, 1943, The Director of Food Distribution, pursuant to authority vested in him, issued War Food Order No. 79.33, effective October 10, 1943, and War Food Order No. 79.102, effective December 1, 1943.

3. War Food Orders Nos. 79, 79.33 and 79.102 were and still are in full force and effect.

4. That between March, 1944, and November, 1944, the defendant, in violation of War Food Orders Nos. 79 and 79.33, delivered milk, cream and butterfat-in-cream, in excess of the amounts authorized by the aforesaid War Food Orders.

Discussion

The testimony clearly established the delivery, by the defendant, of milk, cream and butterfat-in-cream, in excess of the quotas established by the said Food Orders Nos. 79 and 79.33 contrary to the provisions of the said Orders.

It is clear that the issuance of a preliminary injunction is necessary to prevent immediate and irreparable damage, for the reason that if the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • United States v. Russell-Taylor, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Michigan
    • February 4, 1946
    ...United States v. Beit Bros., D.C., 50 F.Supp. 590; National Surety Co. v. Arizona Grocery Co., 32 Ariz. 399, 259 P. 404; United States v. Baur, D.C., 60 F.Supp. 162. War Food Order 13, Amendment 2, Par. (4), defines "cream" in part to include light cream, coffee cream, table cream, whipping......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT