United States v. Benjamin More

Decision Date01 February 1805
PartiesUNITED STATES v. BENJAMIN MORE. 1
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

To continue reading

Request your trial
77 cases
  • State v. Thayer
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 19, 1900
    ...2 L. Ed. 98] as to the jurisdiction. It passed sub silentio, and the court does not consider itself bound by that case.' U. S. v. More, 3 Cranch, 159-172, 2 L. Ed. 397; U. S. v. Sanges, 144 U. S. 310, 12 Sup. Ct. 609, 36 L. Ed. "The counsel for appellant insists strongly that, in a majority......
  • Jacobson v. Fla. Sec'y of State, No. 19-14552
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • April 29, 2020
    ...("We have often said that drive-by jurisdictional rulings of this sort ... have no precedential effect."); United States v. More , 7 U.S. (3 Cranch) 159, 172, 2 L.Ed. 397 (1805) (Marshall, C.J., at oral argument) ("No question was made, in that case, as to the jurisdiction. It passed sub si......
  • Ankenbrandt v. Richards
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • June 15, 1992
    ...89, 119, 104 S.Ct. 900, 918, 79 L.Ed.2d 67 (1984). This Court has never understood the rule differently. United States v. More, 3 Cranch. 159, 172, 2 L.Ed. 397 (1805) (Marshall, C.J.) (statement at oral 7. If, in Barber, the Court might have been said plausibly to have relied on limitations......
  • Gardella v. Chandler
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • February 9, 1949
    ...U.S. 114, 119, 120, 32 S.Ct. 67, 56 L.Ed. 118; United States v. Mitchell, 271 U.S. 9, 14, 46 S.Ct. 418, 70 L.Ed. 799; United States v. More, 3 Cranch 159, 172, 2 L.Ed. 397; The Edward, 1 Wheat. 261, 275, 276, 4 L.Ed. 86; Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Association v. Bowman, 8 Cir., 99 F.2......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • An historical analysis of the binding effect of class suits.
    • United States
    • University of Pennsylvania Law Review Vol. 146 No. 6, August 1998
    • August 1, 1998
    ...(involving a situation in which a few individuals represented a larger class's interest). (150) See Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 7 U.S. 267, 3 Cranch 159 (1806) (holding that federal jurisdiction could not be supported where all plaintiffs and all but one defendant were citizens of the same stat......
  • CHAPTER 10 SUCCESSIVE PETITIONS
    • United States
    • Carolina Academic Press Federal Habeas Corpus: Cases and Materials (CAP)
    • Invalid date
    ...by such other acts as have been passed on the subject." Durousseau v. United States, 10 U.S. 307 (1810); see also United States v. More, 7 U.S. 159 (1805). The Act does remove our authority to entertain an appeal or a petition for a writ of certiorari to review a decision of a court of appe......
  • Establishing Judicial Review? Schooner Peggy and the Early Marshall Court
    • United States
    • Political Research Quarterly No. 51-1, March 1998
    • March 1, 1998
    ...sale of the Peggy should begiven to that ship’s original French owners.5 Stuart v. Laird, 5 U.S. 299 (1803); United States v. More, 7 U.S. 159 (1805). See O’Fallon1992: 240-41; O’Fallon 223tices not adopt a more pro-French position. The circuit court’s insistence thatthe Peggy belonged to h......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT