United States v. Black

Citation497 F.2d 1039
Decision Date31 July 1974
Docket NumberNo. 73-3777.,73-3777.
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lewis BLACK, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)

Howard Moore, Jr., Berkeley, Cal., Henry Sanders, Selma, Ala., for defendant-appellant.

Charles White-Spunner, U. S. Atty., Irwin W. Coleman, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Mobile, Ala., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before BELL, SIMPSON and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges.

BELL, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal from a conviction on two counts of a five count indictment charging embezzlement contrary to 18 U.S.C.A. § 657 in one count, and making or causing to be made false entries in four counts, in contravention of 18 U.S. C.A. § 1006.1 Because we find the evidence insufficient to sustain the conviction on either count, we reverse.

The Greenala Citizens Federal Credit Union was a federally chartered credit union in Hale County, Alabama. Mr. Charles Black, the appellant, was treasurer of the Credit Union, although the record reflects that he also had a full time job with the Federation of Southern Cooperatives. Mr. Clifford Griffin, who was president of the Credit Union during the time period in question, testified that as treasurer, appellant was responsible for maintaining the records and keeping the books of the Credit Union. Mrs. Mildred Black, appellant's wife, was appointed by the directors as assistant treasurer with like responsibilities because, according to Mr. Griffin, "Mr. Black would be out most of the time." Mr. Griffin, as well as Mr. Robert Wiltshire, supervisory examiner for the National Credit Union Administration, testified that two other women were also employed by the Credit Union as clerical personnel with access to the records of the treasurer. Mr. Wiltshire said that during his visits to the Credit Union he had seen both appellant and Mrs. Black making entries in the credit union books.

The first count of the indictment charged appellant as an officer and treasurer of the Credit Union with willfully and knowingly embezzling and misapplying $5,000 of the monies entrusted to the care and custody of the Credit Union and under appellant's care, custody and control, and making and causing to be made a deposit of $5,000 of the Credit Union funds in a personal checking account in the Bank of Moundville, Alabama.

Sometime in June, 1968, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) in Atlanta, Georgia delivered a check for the amount of $14,480.00 payable to the Greenala Citizens Credit Union. The check was dated June 1, 1968 and contained a notation on the face of the check stating: "For transfer to Sabvings" (sic). On the reverse side of the check a handwritten endorsement read: "Pay to the Order of Greenala Citizens Federal." A printed, stamped endorsement stated: "Greenala Citizens Federal Credit Union." On June 22, 1968, the check was negotiated at the Bank of Moundville, Alabama.

A hand-written deposit slip was introduced in evidence showing that a $6,568.71 portion of the SCLC check was deposited to the account of the Credit Union. On the same date and at the same time, a deposit of $5,000 in cash was made to the joint bank account maintained at the Bank of Moundville in the name of "Louis Black or Mildred Black." The parties stipulated that the $5,000 in cash was derived from the SCLC check. The statement of account or ledger sheet for the account of "Louis Black or Mildred Black" was introduced into evidence showing the $5,000 deposit. The statement of account or ledger sheet for the Credit Union was also introduced into evidence showing that the entire amount of the check from the SCLC was not deposited to the account of the Credit Union.

Victor B. Poole, vice president of the Bank of Moundville, testified that the "Louis Black or Mildred Black" account was a joint account, and either could deposit checks and withdraw funds from the account.

The defendant did not take the stand himself and his wife was not called as a witness.

In July, 1971, Mr. Robert Wiltshire commenced an examination of the books and records of the Credit Union that lasted for several months. He testified that $5,000 of the money from the SCLC check had not gone into the Credit Union's account. He also said that the SCLC check was not part of the Credit Union's records, although its accounts were otherwise balanced.

The third count of the indictment states that on or about June 20, 1968 appellant, as treasurer of the Greenala Citizens Federal Credit Union, did make and cause to be made in the members loan record of the Credit Union, on a sheet headed "Individual Share and Loan Ledger" for Andrew Holifield, an entry showing a loan payment in the amount of $325.71, which was said to be a false entry since appellant knew Andrew Holifield had not made any payment on this loan.

At the trial Mr. Holifield testified that he had not made payment of $325.71 on June 20, 1968, or at any other time. Mr. Wiltshire testified that the loan ledger sheet in the name of Andrew Holifield contained an entry showing that $325.71 was paid on June 20, 1968. The defense introduced a "cash received voucher" showing a payment of $325.71 on the account of Andrew Holifield, and on the voucher was the notation: "Received by MB." Mr. Holifield also testified that in January of 1964 appellant approached him and asked that since as an officer and treasurer appellant could not borrow money from the Credit Union whether Mr. Holifield would borrow money for the appellant. Mr. Holifield said appellant asked him to sign a promissory note for $750.00 so that the money could be delivered to appellant. Holifield signed the note and said he and the appellant used the money to rent land. It should be noted that appellant has not been indicted in any respect concerning this 1964 transaction.

* * *

Certain axiomatic principles govern appellate review of the sufficiency of the evidence to support appellant's conviction. The evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the Government. Glasser v. United States, 1942, 315 U.S. 60, 62 S.Ct. 457, 86 L.Ed. 680. All reasonable inferences and credibility choices as will support the jury's verdict of guilty must be made. See Gordon v. United States, 5 Cir., 1971, 438 F.2d 858.

The Government's case on both counts consisted solely of circumstantial evidence.2 The standard is well-settled in this Circuit that in a case based only on circumstantial evidence, the appellate task is to determine whether reasonable minds could conclude that the evidence is inconsistent with the hypothesis of the accused's innocence. Whether the evidence be direct or circumstantial, the matter of the defendant's guilt is for the jury to decide unless the court concludes that the jury must necessarily have had a reasonable doubt. United States v. Velasquez, 5 Cir., 1974, 496 F.2d 1009 No. 74-1262, slip opinion dated July 5, 1974; United States v. Fontenot, 5 Cir., 1973, 483 F. 2d 315, 321; United States v. Warner, 5 Cir., 1971, 441 F.2d 821, 830.

In the instant case the jury must necessarily have had a reasonable doubt as to both counts. Reasonable hypotheses of innocence were not excluded.

As will be seen, the proof on each count made out a classic case of an unexcluded reasonable hypothesis of innocence. See, as examples, United States v. Schorr, 5 Cir., 1972, 462 F.2d 953; United States v. Duke, 5 Cir., 1970, 423 F.2d 387; South v. United States, 5 Cir., 1969, 412 F.2d 697; Montoya v. United States, 5 Cir., 1968, 402 F.2d 847; Cuthbert v. United States, 5 Cir., 1960, 278 F.2d 220.

As to the first count, the evidence did not exclude the reasonable hypothesis that someone other than appellant converted or misapplied funds belonging to the Credit Union. Specifically, a reasonable hypothesis of Mr. Black's innocence is that Mrs. Black committed the crime.

No witness testified Mr. Black received or negotiated the check. No witness testified that he deposited $5,000 in cash in his joint bank account. No witness testified that appellant counselled, procured, aided or abetted any other person to do or commit any act in connection with this transaction. Neither the teller at the bank who administered the transaction nor a documents examiner or handwriting expert was offered to connect appellant to the charged transaction.

The Government only demonstrated the circumstantial facts that appellant was treasurer of the Credit Union and a portion of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
130 cases
  • U.S. v. Elliott
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • April 21, 1978
    ...not a reasonable one for the jury to entertain and that "(r)easonable hypotheses of innocence were not excluded". United States v. Black, 497 F.2d 1039, 1041 (5th Cir. 1974). We are convinced that Elliott "associated with the wrong people and was convicted because of guilt by association on......
  • Cox v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • March 15, 1991
    ...whether such evidence excludes every reasonable hypothesis but guilt, but whether a jury might reasonably so conclude. United States v. Black, 497 F.2d 1039 (5th Cir.1974); United States v. McGlamory, 441 F.2d 130 (5th Cir.1971); Clark v. United States, 293 F.2d 445 (5th " ' " '[W]e must ke......
  • Davis v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • May 29, 1998
    ...so conclude.' "Cumbo v. State, 368 So.2d 871, 874 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 368 So.2d 877 (Ala.1979), citing United States v. Black, 497 F.2d 1039 (5th Cir.1974). Additionally, circumstantial evidence may form the proof of the corpus delicti; if facts are presented from which a jury may ......
  • Johnson v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • May 20, 2014
    ...whether such evidence excludes every reasonable hypothesis but guilt, but whether a jury might reasonably so conclude. United States v. Black, 497 F.2d 1039 (5th Cir.1974) ; United States v. McGlamory, 441 F.2d 130 (5th Cir.1971) ; Clark v. United States, 293 F.2d 445 (5th Cir.1961).’ " Bra......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT