United States v. Blair
| Docket Number | 10-4478 |
| Decision Date | 21 September 2011 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
41 cases
-
United States v. Elshinawy
...plan." The question of whether offenses are improperly joined under Rule 8(a) is a question of law for the court. United States v. Blair, 661 F.3d 755, 768 (4th Cir. 2011). Joinder of related charges is broadly permitted to avoid "needless duplication" of judicial proceedings. United States......
-
Blair v. United States 2255
...convictions on all counts but Count Eleven (Obstruction of Justice), which was reversed for insufficient evidence. United States v. Blair, 661 F.3d 755, 766-70 (4th Cir. 2011). The case was remanded to this Court for resentencing. Id. at 775. The Supreme Court thereafter denied Blair's peti......
-
United States v. Chujoy
...or undermine the due administration of justice. United States v. Richardson , 676 F.3d 491, 506 (5th Cir.2012) ; United States v. Blair , 661 F.3d 755, 766 (4th Cir.2011) ; United States v. Grubb , 11 F.3d 426, 437 (4th Cir.1993). The government need not show that justice was actually obstr......
-
United States ex rel.Drakeford v. Tuomey Healthcare Sys., Inc.
...well as “whether ... the contracts implicate the ‘volume or value’ standard under the Stark Law.” Ante at 406; see United States v. Blair, 661 F.3d 755, 773 (4th Cir.2011) (“[R]endering advisory opinions on cases not before us is not the office of this court.”). Under the district court's o......
Get Started for Free
9 books & journal articles
-
Money Laundering
...Senate Report, that “Congress intended the term ‘transaction’ to be interpreted broadly . . . .”). 80. See United States v. Blair, 661 F.3d 755, 764 (4th Cir. 2011) (“Almost any exchange of money between two parties qualifies as a financial transaction subject to criminal prosecution unde......
-
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
...have adopted the three elements. See, e.g., United States v. Edlind, 887 F.3d 166, 176 (4th Cir. 2018) (citing United States v. Blair, 661 F.3d 755, 766 (4th Cir. 2011)); United States v. Sussman, 709 F.3d 155, 168 (3d Cir. 2013); Richardson, 676 F.3d at 502; United States v. Erickson, 561 ......
-
Obstruction of justice
...v. Schwarz, 283 F.3d 76, 105–06 (2d Cir. 2002); United States v. Sussman, 709 F.3d 155, 177–79 (3d Cir. 2013); United States v. Blair, 661 F.3d 755, 766 (4th Cir. 2011); United States v. McBride, 362 F.3d 360, 372 (6th Cir. 2004); United States v. Machi, 811 F.2d 991, 996 (7th Cir. 1987); U......
-
Obstruction of Justice
...have adopted the three elements. See, e.g. , United States v. Edlind, 887 F.3d 166, 176 (4th Cir. 2018) (citing United States v. Blair, 661 F.3d 755, 766 (4th Cir. 2011)); United States v. Sussman, 709 F.3d 155, 168 (3d Cir. 2013); Richardson , 676 F.3d at 502; United States v. Erickson, 56......
Get Started for Free