United States v. Bland, 505
| Decision Date | 25 May 1931 |
| Docket Number | No. 505,505 |
| Citation | 283 U.S. 636,51 S.Ct. 569,75 L.Ed. 1319 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES v. BLAND |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
The Attorney General and Mr. Thomas D. Thacher, of Washington, D. C., for the United States.
Emily Marx, of New York City, for respondent.
This case is ruled by the decision just announced in United States v. Macintosh, 283 U. S. 605, 51 S. Ct. 570, 75 L. Ed. 1302.
The respondent, an applicant for citizenship, was a native of Canada and came to the United States in 1914. She had duly declared her intention to become a citizen. She refused to take the oath of allegiance prescribed by the statute to defend the Constitution and laws of the United States against all enemies, etc., except with the written interpolation of the words, 'as far as my conscience as a Christian will allow.' It is unnecessary to review her testimony. The only difference between the position she took, and that taken by the respondent in the Macintosh Case, is that, in addition to refusing positively to bear rms in defense of the United States under any circumstances, she required an actual amendment of the oath as already stated, instead of reserving the point by parol. As we said in the Macintosh Case, this is a circumstance which has no distinguishing effect. The substance of the oath has been definitely prescribed by Congress. The words of the statute do not admit of the qualification upon which the applicant insists. For the court to allow it to be made is to amend the act and thereby usurp the power of legislation vested in another department of the government.
The examiner reported against the applicant, and the court of first instance, after a full hearing, denied the application. We think its decree was right.
The decree of the Court of Appeals is reversed and that of the District Court is affirmed.
What I have said in the case of United States v. Macintosh, 283 U. S. 605 51 S. Ct. 570, 75 L. Ed. 1302, with respect to the interpretation of the provisions of the Naturalization Act and of the prescribed oath, I think applies also to this case. The petitioner is a nurse who spent nine months in the service of our government in France, nursing United States soldiers and aiding in psychiatric work. She has religious scruples against bearing arms. I think that it sufficiently appears that her unwillingness to take the oath was merely because of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Monroe v. Pape
...644, 49 S.Ct. 448, 73 L.Ed. 889, United States v. Macintosh, 283 U.S. 605, 51 S.Ct. 570, 75 L.Ed. 1302, and United States v. Bland, 283 U.S. 636, 51 S.Ct. 569, 75 L.Ed. 1319; see also Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Estate of Church, 335 U.S. 632, 69 S.Ct. 322, 337, 93 L.Ed. 288, overru......
-
Park v. Appeal Bd. of Mich. Employment Sec. Commission, s. 43
...U.S. 644, 49 S.Ct. 448, 73 L.Ed. 889; United States v. Macintosh, 283 U.S. 605, 51 S.Ct. 570, 75 L.Ed. 1302; United States v. Bland, 283 U.S. 636, 51 S.Ct. 569, 75 L.Ed. 1319), the majority opinion stated [328 U.S. 61, 66 S.Ct. 'We are met, however, with the argument that even though those ......
-
Minersville School Dist. v. Gobitis
...to win wars; a fortiori, is the remoteness of the sock-knitting and nursing abilities of grown-up girls. See United States v. Bland, 283 U. S. 636, 51 S.Ct. 569, 75 L.Ed. 1319; United States v. Schwimmer, above cited. We conclude that patriotism is an added advantage rather than an essentia......
-
41 439 Parker v. Levy 8212 206
...the law when Schwimmer, supra, United States v. Macintosh, 283 U.S. 605, 51 S.Ct. 570, 75 L.Ed. 1302, and United States v. Bland, 283 U.S. 636, 51 S.Ct. 569, 75 L.Ed. 1319, were overruled by Girouard v. United States, 328 U.S. 61, 66 S.Ct. 826, 90 L.Ed. 1084. 1. Article 133 provides: 'Any c......
-
Lessons from Pharaoh and the Hebrew Midwives: Conscientious Objection to State Mandates as a Free Exercise Right
...69 (overruling United States v. Schwimmer, 279 U.S. 644 (1929); United States v. Macintosh, 283 U.S. 605 (1931); United States v. Bland, 283 U.S. 636 (1931)). 168. Girouard, 328 U.S. at 68-69 (quoting Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943)) (citation omitted). 169. United States v. Macintosh, 283 U.......
-
Freedom of Conscience in War Time: World War I and the Limits of Civil Liberties
...1930-1931, at 12 (1931).524. Am. Civil Liberties Union, The Story of Civil Liberty, 1929-1930, at 9 (1930).525. United States v. Bland, 283 U.S. 636, 636 (1931); United States v. Macintosh, 283 U.S. 605, 623 (1931).526. Brief for Respondent at 34-35, Macintosh, 283 U.S. 605 (No. 504), 1931 ......