United States v. Bleckley

Decision Date30 April 1973
Docket NumberNo. 72-3362 Summary Calendar.,72-3362 Summary Calendar.
Citation475 F.2d 1225
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Carlton BLECKLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

C. Frank Strickland, Jr., Gainesville, Ga., for defendant-appellant.

John W. Stokes, Jr., U. S. Atty., Robert L. Smith, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and DYER and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction entered on a jury verdict that Bleckley wilfully and by means and use of a dangerous weapon, a 30-30 rifle, forcibly assaulted a United States Deputy Game Warden who was engaged in the performance of his official duties, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 111.

Bleckley's sole point on appeal is that the Government failed to prove his sanity beyond a reasonable doubt and that he was entitled to a directed verdict of acquittal.

Bleckley's defense of insanity at the time of the offense was properly submitted to the jury on conflicting evidence under a correct charge conforming to the standards of Blake v. United States, 5 Cir. 1969, 407 F.2d 908.

"As we said in Blake `the evidence could go either way.' Here the jury found that it went against the defendant. The jury need not be bound by defendant's expert testimony, especially since there are `material variations between the experts themselves * * *.' Mims v. United States, 5 Cir., 1967, 375 F.2d 135, 143. It was for the jury, not the Court." United States v. O'Neal, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 695, cert. denied, 401 U.S. 917, 91 S.Ct. 898, 27 L.Ed.2d 818.

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • United States v. Bass
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • March 11, 1974
    ...there were no "material variations between the experts themselves." Mims v. United States, supra, 375 F.2d at 144; United States v. Bleckley, 5th Cir. 1973, 475 F.2d 1225. The government made no attempt to discredit the defendant's expert witnesses; on the contrary, the government's Dr. Cli......
  • U.S. v. Wright, 03-13359.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (11th Circuit)
    • December 8, 2004
    ...and here the jury found against Wright. The jury is not obligated to give more credence to defense witnesses. See United States v. Bleckley, 475 F.2d 1225 (5th Cir.1973). While there is not an abundance of direct evidence supporting the trial court's instruction that the conduct of a defend......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT