United States v. Bleckley
Decision Date | 30 April 1973 |
Docket Number | No. 72-3362 Summary Calendar.,72-3362 Summary Calendar. |
Citation | 475 F.2d 1225 |
Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Carlton BLECKLEY, Defendant-Appellant. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
C. Frank Strickland, Jr., Gainesville, Ga., for defendant-appellant.
John W. Stokes, Jr., U. S. Atty., Robert L. Smith, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and DYER and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction entered on a jury verdict that Bleckley wilfully and by means and use of a dangerous weapon, a 30-30 rifle, forcibly assaulted a United States Deputy Game Warden who was engaged in the performance of his official duties, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 111.
Bleckley's sole point on appeal is that the Government failed to prove his sanity beyond a reasonable doubt and that he was entitled to a directed verdict of acquittal.
Bleckley's defense of insanity at the time of the offense was properly submitted to the jury on conflicting evidence under a correct charge conforming to the standards of Blake v. United States, 5 Cir. 1969, 407 F.2d 908.
United States v. O'Neal, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 695, cert. denied, 401 U.S. 917, 91 S.Ct. 898, 27 L.Ed.2d 818.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United States v. Bass
...there were no "material variations between the experts themselves." Mims v. United States, supra, 375 F.2d at 144; United States v. Bleckley, 5th Cir. 1973, 475 F.2d 1225. The government made no attempt to discredit the defendant's expert witnesses; on the contrary, the government's Dr. Cli......
-
U.S. v. Wright, 03-13359.
...and here the jury found against Wright. The jury is not obligated to give more credence to defense witnesses. See United States v. Bleckley, 475 F.2d 1225 (5th Cir.1973). While there is not an abundance of direct evidence supporting the trial court's instruction that the conduct of a defend......