United States v. Bobinski, 349
| Decision Date | 01 May 1958 |
| Docket Number | Docket 24901.,No. 349,349 |
| Citation | 254 F.2d 686 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maxim BOBINSKI et al., Defendants-Appellants. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
Edgar G. Brisach, New York City (John H. Finn, New York City, Gordon M. Lipetz, Solomon Raffe, Riverhead, N. Y., and Remsen Brinckerhoff, New York City, on the brief), for defendants-appellants.
Roger P. Marquis, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Perry W. Morton, Asst. Atty. Gen., and A. Donald Mileur, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., and Harry T. Dolan, Sp. Asst. to the Atty. Gen., on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.
When this case was before us on a previous appeal, we ordered the judgment below vacated for further findings and explanation of his award by the trial judge, United States v. Bobinski, 2 Cir., 244 F.2d 299. He has complied with our mandate and the case is again before us on an unchanged award, but with fuller findings and explanatory opinion. We think his award is now sustained by his findings, and in accord with the usual principles of review we must sustain the result thus supported by the evidence. United States v. 44.00 Acres of Land, 2 Cir., 234 F.2d 410, certiorari denied Odenbach v. United States, 352 U.S. 916, 77 S.Ct. 215, 1 L.Ed.2d 123. No further findings or proceedings are required and various other contentions presented do not show error.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Thacker v. JC Penney Company, 16561.
... ... J. C. PENNEY COMPANY, Appellee ... No. 16561 ... United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ... April 7, 1958 ... Accord, Kelley v. Texas & P. Ry. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 149 S.W. 349; Galveston, H. & H. Ry. Co. v. Moore, 59 Tex. 64; Restatement 11, Tort ... ...
-
United States v. Vater
...findings of the district court, after two appeals to this court, were eventually upheld in their entirety. United States v. Bobinski, 2 Cir., 1958, 254 F.2d 686; 2 Cir., 1957, 244 F.2d The hearings on the nine parcels known as the Vater group, six of which are involved in this appeal, were ......
-
United States v. Meadow Brook Club
...2 Cir., 244 F.2d 299, these show without ambiguity the method which the court employed in reaching its valuations. See United States v. Bobinski, 2 Cir., 254 F.2d 686. In the simple and uncomplicated federal practice there is no provision for cross-examining a judge upon his decision throug......