United States v. Booker, 04-104.
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
| Citation | United States v. Booker, 542 U.S. 955 (2004) |
| Decision Date | 21 July 2004 |
| Docket Number | No. 04-104.,04-104. |
| Parties | UNITED STATES v. BOOKER. |
C. A. 7th Cir. Respondent is directed to file responses to petition for writ of certiorari and to motion to expedite consideration on or before 3 p.m., Wednesday, July 28, 2004.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
4 cases
-
Childress v. Booker, Case Number: 5:11-CV-14549
...jury, proven beyond a reasonable doubt, or conceded at the plea hearing in violation of his constitutional rights. See Blakely v. Washington, 543 U.S. 296, 303-05 (2004) (state trial court's action in sentencing defendant beyond the statutory maximum of the standard range for his offense ba......
-
United States v. Williams
...defendant to a term of life imprisonment [Doc. 780]. On appeal, the Sixth Circuit remanded for resentencing in light of United States v. Booker, 125 S.Ct. 738 (2005) [Doc. 893]. At resentencing, Judge R. Leon Jordan imposed life sentence [Doc. 942]. Defendant appealed, and the Sixth Circuit......
-
People v. Taylor
...determines the presence or absence of the aggravating factors required by Arizona law for imposition of the death penalty); Blakely v. Washington, 524 U.S. 296 (2004) down a Washington state law which authorized enhanced sentencing where the court found that the defendant acted with "delibe......
-
Cropper v. Emig
...in this Court, this time asserting that his 1999 conviction and sentence as a habitual offender was unconstitutional under Blakely v. Washington, 524 U.S. 296 (2004). D.I. 1 in Cropper v. Carroll, Civ. A. No. 05-412-JFF) Judge Faman denied that petition for lack of jurisdiction because it c......