United States v. Brantley
| Docket Number | 13-12776 |
| Decision Date | 09 October 2015 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
33 cases
-
United States v. Young, CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 16–45–JWD–RLB
...narrow number of cases, a court is not free to second-guess the prosecutor's exercise of charging discretion.United States v. Brantley , 803 F.3d 1265, 1271–72 (11th Cir. 2015), cert. denied , ––– U.S. ––––, 136 S.Ct. 1833, 194 L.Ed.2d 837 (2016).Lastly, the First Circuit has articulated a ......
-
United States v. Washington
...and do not assign it the weight of precedent.84 See United States v. Hare, 820 F.3d 93, 98–99 (4th Cir. 2016) ; United States v. Brantley, 803 F.3d 1265, 1271 (11th Cir. 2015) ; Johnson v. Crooks, 326 F.3d 995, 1000 (8th Cir. 2003) ("When the claim is selective enforcement of the traffic la......
-
United States v. Barber
...failed to identify similarly situated comparators, he cannot establish a claim of selective prosecution. See United States v. Brantley, 803 F.3d 1265, 1271 (11th Cir. 2015). Counsel was not constitutionally ineffective for failing to raise a meritless claim. Ground Eight Barber says that co......
-
United States v. Cannon
...failed to identify similarly situated comparators who engaged in the same type and quantity of voting crimes); United States v. Brantley, 803 F.3d 1265, 1271–73 (11th Cir. 2015) (affirming the denial of motion to dismiss based on selective prosecution where sole comparator's conduct was mat......
Get Started for Free
10 books & journal articles
-
CORPORATE CRIMINAL LIABILITY
...Weverka, No. 4:17CR3039, 2017 WL 4071387, at *3 (D. Neb. Aug. 28, 2017). 91. See 18 U.S.C. § 4; see also e.g., United States v. Brantley, 803 F.3d 1265, 1276 (11th Cir. 2015); Baer v. United States, 722 F.3d 168, 176 (3d Cir. 2013); United States v. White Eagle, 721 F.3d 1108, 1119 (9th Cir......
-
Corporate Criminal Liability
...Federal Misprision of Felony Statute , 55 ALA. L. REV. 183, 190–92 (2003). 66. See 18 U.S.C. § 4; see , e.g. , United States v. Brantley, 803 F.3d 1265, 1276 (11th Cir. 2015); Baer v. United States, 722 F.3d 168, 176 (3d Cir. 2013); United States v. White Eagle, 721 F.3d 1108, 1119 (9th Cir......
-
Corporate Criminal Liability
...No. 4:17CR3039, 2017 WL 4071387, at *3 (D. Neb. Aug. 28, 2017). 83. See 18 U.S.C. § 4; see also e.g. , United States v. Brantley, 803 F.3d 1265, 1276 (11th Cir. 2015); Baer v. United States, 722 F.3d 168, 176 (3d Cir. 2013); United States v. White Eagle, 721 F.3d 1108, 1119 (9th Cir. 2013);......
-
Perjury
...inadmissible, even if admitted for the purpose of impeachment. 172 165. 18 U.S.C. § 6002. 166. E.g. , United States v. Brantley, 803 F.3d 1265, 1275 (11th Cir. 2015) (“[A]n individual cannot use the Fifth Amendment to shield a false statement to a law enforcement officer.”); United States ......
Get Started for Free