United States v. Brierley
| Decision Date | 22 December 1967 |
| Docket Number | No. 16698.,16698. |
| Citation | 387 F.2d 127 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Hercules BUTLER, Appellant, v. Joseph R. BRIERLEY, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit |
Hercules Butler, pro se.
William H. Lamb, Asst. Dist. Atty., A. Alfred Delduco, Dist. Atty., Chester County, West Chester, Pa., for appellee.
Before MARIS, KALODNER and SEITZ, Circuit Judges.
Appellant was convicted in the Pennsylvania State Court of burglary and first degree murder and is serving a life sentence. Conviction was affirmed by the state appellate courts. Thereafter he sought a writ of habeas corpus in the district court which, after hearing, remanded the matter to the state court to conduct a hearing on appellant's primary complaint, namely, that he was convicted on the basis of a confession not voluntarily obtained.
The state court held a substantial testimonial hearing at which appellant was represented by counsel. That court determined, based on its application of the principles of Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 12 L.Ed.2d 908 (1964), that the confession was not subject to any constitutional infirmity. Thereafter the district court, after reviewing the matter, determined that the state court's decision was fully justified when tested by the principles of Jackson v. Denno. In making this determination the district court considered all the prior judicial proceedings. Of vital importance, in arriving at its decision the district court made an independent evaluation of the transcript of the testimony taken in the state court on the issue of the voluntariness of the confession.
In view of the completeness of the record before the district court, particularly the evidence of the hearing held by the state court, we conclude that the district court was under no duty to conduct an independent hearing on the issue of the voluntariness of the confession. There is no suggestion that the appellant was prevented at the state court hearing from offering any evidence pertinent to the issue of the voluntariness of his confession.
The other grounds asserted by the appellant were properly disposed of in the memorandum accompanying the district court's order of January 19, 1967.
The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
McCutcheon v. Beto
...at the trial is fairly determined to be voluntary. * * *" 378 U.S. at 395-396, 84 S.Ct. at 1791. See also: United States ex rel. Butler v. Brierley, 3rd Cir., 387 F.2d 127. Petitioner's claim of involuntariness is based largely on his alleged susceptibility to coercion as a dope addict and ......
-
United States ex rel. Hughes v. Rundle, 17849.
...v. Brierley, 415 F.2d 9 (3 Cir. 1969); United States ex rel. Rowles v. Myers, 407 F.2d 1332 (3 Cir. 1969); United States ex rel. Butler v. Brierley, 387 F.2d 127 (3 Cir. 1967). 6 United States ex rel. Darrah v. Brierley, 7 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed. 2d 274 (1969). 8 434 Pa. 532, ......
-
United States ex rel. Darrah v. Brierley
...hearing. Townsend v. Sain, supra; United States ex rel. Rowles v. Myers, 407 F.2d 1332 (3 Cir. 1969); United States ex rel. Butler v. Brierley, 387 F.2d 127 (3 Cir. 1967). Clearly there has been no infringement of appellant's fundamental constitutional rights. Likewise, the District Court's......
-
Commonwealth v. Butler
... ... Banmiller, 20 Pa.Dist. & Co ... R.2d 267 (1959). The second petition was filed in the United ... States District Court for the Western District of ... Pennsylvania. In that case, the court ... the District Court: United States ex rel. Butler v ... Brierley, Superintendent, 387 F.2d 127 (3rd Cir. 1967) ... On November ... 1, 1968 appellant ... ...