United States v. Burroughs

Decision Date15 May 1933
Docket NumberNo. 5653.,5653.
Citation65 F.2d 796,62 App. DC 163
PartiesUNITED STATES v. BURROUGHS et al.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit

Leo A. Rover, U. S. Atty., and John J. Wilson, James R. Kirkland, and Roger Robb, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Washington, D. C.

Robert H. McNeill and Levi H. David, both of Washington, D. C., and H. Woodward Winburn, of Greensboro, N. C., for appellees.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and VAN ORSDEL, HITZ, and GRONER, Associate Justices.

MARTIN, Chief Justice.

An appeal by the United States from an order of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia sustaining a demurrer to an indictment charging a violation of the Federal Corrupt Practices Act of February 28, 1925 (chapter 368, title 3, § 301 et seq. 43 Stat. 1053, 1070), incorporated in the U. S. Code as § 241 et seq. c. 8, title 2 (2 USCA § 241 et seq.).

The pertinent provisions of the act as set forth in title 2, U. S. Code (2 USCA), read as follows:

"Section 241. * * * (c) The term `political committee' includes any committee, association, or organization which accepts contributions or makes expenditures for the purpose of influencing or attempting to influence the election of candidates or presidential and vice presidential electors (1) in two or more States, or (2) whether or not in more than one State if such committee, association, or organization (other than a duly organized State or local committee of a political party) is a branch or subsidiary of a national committee, association, or organization.

"§ 242. Chairman and treasurer of political committee; duties as to contributions; accounts and receipts. (a) Every political committee shall have a chairman and a treasurer. No contribution shall be accepted, and no expenditure made, by or on behalf of a political committee for the purpose of influencing an election until such chairman and treasurer have been chosen.

"(b) It shall be the duty of the treasurer of a political committee to keep a detailed and exact account of —

"(1) All contributions made to or for such committee;

"(2) The name and address of every person making any such contribution, and the date thereof;

"(3) All expenditures made by or on behalf of such committee; and

"(4) The name and address of every person to whom any such expenditure is made, and the date thereof.

"(c) It shall be the duty of the treasurer to obtain and keep a receipted bill, stating the particulars, for every expenditure by or on behalf of a political committee exceeding $10 in amount. The treasurer shall preserve all receipted bills and accounts required to be kept by this section for a period of at least two years from the date of the filing of the statement containing such items.

"§ 243. Accounts of contributions received. Every person who receives a contribution for a political committee shall, on demand of the treasurer, and in any event within five days after the receipt of such contribution, render to the treasurer a detailed account thereof, including the name and address of the person making such contribution, and the date on which received.

"§ 244. Statements by treasurer filed with Clerk of House of Representatives. (a) The treasurer of a political committee shall file with the Clerk between the 1st and 10th days of March, June, and September in each year, and also between the 10th and 15th days, and on the 5th day, next preceding the date on which a general election is to be held, at which candidates are to be elected in two or more States, and also on the 1st day of January, a statement containing, complete as of the day next preceding the date of filing —

"(1) The name and address of each person who has made a contribution to or for such committee in one or more items of the aggregate amount or value, within the calendar year, of $100 or more, together with the amount and date of such contribution;

"(2) The total sum of the contributions made to or for such committee during the calendar year and not stated under paragraph (1);

"(3) The total sum of all contributions made to or for such committee during the calendar year;

"(4) The name and address of each person to whom an expenditure in one or more items of the aggregate amount or value, within the calendar year, of $10 or more has been made by or on behalf of such committee, and the amount, date, and purpose of such expenditure;

"(5) The total sum of all expenditures made by or on behalf of such committee during the calendar year and not stated under paragraph (4);

"(6) The total sum of expenditures made by or on behalf of such committee during the calendar year.

"(b) The statements required to be filed by subdivision (a) shall be cumulative during the calendar year to which they relate, but where there has been no change in an item reported in a previous statement only the amount need be carried forward.

"(c) The statement filed on the 1st day of January shall cover the preceding calendar year. * * *

"§ 252. General penalties for violations. (a) Any person who violates any of the foregoing provisions of this chapter, except those for which a specific penalty is imposed by section 208 of Title 18, and section 251 of this title, shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

"(b) Any person who willfully violates any of the foregoing provisions of this chapter, except those for which a specific penalty is imposed by section 208 of Title 18, and section 251 of this title, shall be fined not more than $10,000 and imprisoned not more than two years."

The appellees, Ada L. Burroughs and James Cannon, Jr., were indicted by a grand jury of the District of Columbia for an alleged violation of section 244 of the foregoing act.

The indictment is in ten counts. The first eight counts charge the defendants with violations of the act and the last two counts charge them with conspiracy to violate the same. In the first, third, fifth, and seventh counts the charge is made that the defendants willfully violated the statute. In the second, fourth, sixth, and eighth counts it is not charged that the offense was willfully committed. In the first conspiracy count the charge is made that the offense was willfully committed. In the second of these counts the word "willfully" is omitted from the charge. We shall take the first and second counts as illustrative of the first eight counts.

The first count charges that Burroughs from July 22, 1928, to March 16, 1929, was the treasurer of a certain political committee which then accepted contributions and made expenditures for the purpose of influencing and attempting to influence the election of presidential and vice presidential electors in two states; that at divers times during that period various contributions of money were made by one E. C. Jameson for said political committee, aggregating the sum of $58,000; that it thereafter, and during said period of time, to wit, between the 10th and 15th days next preceding November 6, 1928, the date on which a general election was held at which candidates and presidential and vice presidential electors were elected in the several states of the United States, became and was the lawful duty of said Burroughs, as such treasurer of said political committee, to file with the Clerk of the House of Representatives of the United States a statement, complete as of the day next preceding the date of the filing thereof, if it should be filed, containing the name and address of said E. C. Jameson, the person who made said contributions for said political committee as aforesaid, together with the amount and date of each of said contributions. The indictment further alleges that during said period of time, and while she was treasurer of said political committee, said Burroughs unlawfully and feloniously did willfully violate section 244 of chapter 8 of title 2 of the United States Code aforesaid, by then and there unlawfully and feloniously willfully failing to file with said Clerk, to wit, in said District of Columbia, any such statement, or any statement whatever, pertaining to said contribution, containing any such information; and that at and within the District of Columbia the appellee Cannon during said period of time, well knowing all the premises aforesaid, unlawfully and feloniously did willfully aid, abet, and procure the commission of the above-described offense on the part of said Burroughs, and so was then and there a principal in the commission of that offense.

The second count of said indictment contained the same allegations of facts as those contained in the first count, except for the omission of the words "feloniously and willfully" therefrom, charging only that the failure of Burroughs to file said statement was "unlawfully" done. The count, however, charged that Cannon unlawfully did willfully aid and abet Burroughs in the commission of the offense.

The appellees filed a demurrer to the indictment upon the grounds, first, that the Federal Corrupt Practices Act and section 244 thereof were and are unconstitutional; and, second, that the indictment is insufficient to inform the accused of the nature and cause of the accusation against them and to afford due process of law as guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States.

The demurrer was submitted to the lower court and was sustained upon the second of the grounds therein set out.

The United States thereupon appealed from that decision to this court. The appellees then filed a motion in this court to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that under the Criminal Appeals Act (18 U. S. C. § 682 18 USCA § 682) the appeal should have been taken directly to the Supreme Court of the United States, and consequently that this court was without jurisdiction to entertain it. However, in answer to interrogatories certified by us to the United States Supreme Court, this court was instructed that under section 935, D. C. Code, we possess...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Nader v. Saxbe
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • April 4, 1974
    ...§ 3282 (1970). 10 Complaint for Declaratory Judgment and Mandamus, Civil Action No. 243-72, Feb. 8, 1972. 11 United States v. Burroughs, 62 App.D.C. 163, 65 F.2d 796 (1933), affirmed, 290 U.S. 534, 54 S.Ct. 287, 78 L.Ed. 484 (1934). This case upheld the constitutionality of the 12 Complaint......
  • Sherman v. United States.
    • United States
    • D.C. Court of Appeals
    • March 16, 1944
    ...v. United States, 5 Cir., 67 F.2d 820, 90 A.L.R. 1276; Townsend v. United States, 68 App.D.C. 223, 95 F.2d 352; United States v. Burroughs, 62 App.D.C. 163, 65 F.2d 796. 9‘Instructions are required only on matters about which there is some issue to be presented to the jury.’ 23 C.J.S., Crim......
  • U.S. v. Finance Committee to Re-Elect the President
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • December 2, 1974
    ...of scienter. Still the Supreme Court cannot be said to have overridden the view expressed in the case below in this court, 62 U.S.App.D.C. 163, 65 F.2d 796 (1933), that the non-willful section would punish a failure to report as required because of carelessness, inadvertence, or neglect, or......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT