United States v. Caceres-Mejia, 12–41261

• Decision Date: 17 July 2013
• Docket Number: No. 12–41261,Summary Calendar.,12–41261
• Citation: 719 F.3d 705
• Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Wilson Alejandro CACERES–MEJIA, Defendant–Appellant.
• Court: U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

719 F.3d 705

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee,

v.Wilson Alejandro CACERES–MEJIA, Defendant–Appellant.

No. 12–41261

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

July 17, 2013.

Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff–Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender's Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, USDC No. 7:12–CR–1179–1.

Before KING, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: ^*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Wilson Alejandro Caceres–Mejia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Caceres–Mejia has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See5th Cir. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.