United States v. California Land Co, No. 1,073

CourtUnited States Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtBREWER
Citation148 U.S. 31,37 L.Ed. 354,13 S.Ct. 458
PartiesUNITED STATES v. CALIFORNIA & O. LAND CO
Docket NumberNo. 1,073
Decision Date06 March 1893

148 U.S. 31
13 S.Ct. 458
37 L.Ed. 354
UNITED STATES

v.

CALIFORNIA & O. LAND CO.

No. 1,073.
March 6, 1893.

Statement by Mr. Justice BREWER:

On July 2, 1864, congress passed an act granting lands to the state of Oregon to aid in the construction of a military road from Eugene City to the eastern boundary of the state. 13 St. p. 355. A proviso to the first and granting section was 'that the lands hereby granted shall be ex-

Page 32

clusively applied in the construction of said road, and shall be disposed of only as the work progresses; and the same shall be applied to no other purpose whatever.' The third and fourth sections read:

'Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, that said road shall be constructed with such width, graduation, and bridges as to permit of its regular use as a wagon road, and in such other special manner as the state of Oregon may prescribe.

'Sec. 4. And be it further enacted, that the lands hereby granted to said state shall be disposed of only in the following manner, that is to say: That a quantity of land, not exceeding thirty sections, for said road may be sold; and when the governor of said state shall certify to the secretary of the interior that any ten continuous miles of said road are completed, then another quantity of land hereby granted, not to exceed thirty sections, may be sold, and so from time to time until said road is completed; and if said road is not completed within five years, no further sales shall be made, and the land remaining unsold shall revert to the United States.'

On October 24, 1864, the legislature of Oregon in its turn granted these lands to the Oregon Central Military Road Company, for the purpose of aiding it in constructing the road. Laws Or. 1864, p. 36. On June 18, 1874, congress enacted:

'Chap. 305. An act to authorize the issuance of patents for lands granted to the state of Oregon in certain cases.

'Whereas, certain lands have heretofore, by acts of congress, been granted to the state of Oregon to aid in the construction of certain military wagon roads in said state, and there exists no law providing for the issuing of formal patents for said lands: Therefore,

'Be it enacted by the senate and house of representatives of the United States of America in congress assembled, that in all cases when the roads in aid of the construction of which said lands were granted are shown by the certificate of the governor of the state of Oregon, as in said acts provided, to have been constructed and completed, patents for said lands shall issue in due form to the state of Oregon as fast as the

Page 33

same shall, under said grants, be selected and certified, unless the state of Oregon shall be public act have transferred its interests in said lands to any corporation or corporations, in which case the patents shall issue from the general land office to such corporation or corporations upon their payment of the necessary expenses thereof: provided, that this shall not be construed to revive any land grant already expired, nor to create any new rights of any kind except to provide for issuing patents for lands to which the state is already entitled.' 18 St. p. 80.

On March 2, 1889, congress passed an act (25 St. p. 850) entitled 'An act providing in certain cases for the forfeiture of wagon road grants in the state of Oregon,' which commenced with this recital:

'Whereas, the United States have heretofore made various grants of public lands to aid in the construction of different wagon roads in the state of Oregon, and upon the condition that such roads should be completed within prescribed times; and whereas, said grants were transferred by said state to sundry corporations, who were authorized by the state to construct such wagon roads, and to receive therefor the grants of lands thus made; and whereas, the department of the interior certified portions of said lands to the state of Oregon upon the theory that said roads had been completed as required by the granting acts of congress, and upon the certificate of the governor of the state of Oregon as to such completion; and whereas, the legislature of the state of Oregon has memorialized congress, and therein alleged that certain of said wagon roads, in whole or in part, were not so completed, and that to the extent of the lands coterminous with unconstructed portions the certifications thereof by the department of the interior were unauthorized and illegal: Therefore,'—and directed the attorney general of the United States within six months to institute suits in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Oregon against all firms, persons, or corporations claiming to own or have an interest in lands

Page 34

granted to the state of Oregon by certain enumerated acts of congress,—among others, the act above referred to, of July 2, 1864,—'to determine the questions of the reasonable and proper completion of said roads in accordance with the terms of the granting acts, either in whole or in part, the legal effect of the several certificates of the governors of the state of Oregon of the completion of said roads, and the right of resumption of such granted lands by the United States, and to obtain judgments, which the court is hereby authorized to render, declaring forfeited to the United States all of such lands as are coterminous with the part or parts of either of said wagon roads which were not constructed in accordance with the requirements of the granting acts, and setting aside patents which have issued for any such lands, saving and preserving the rights of all bona fide purchasers of either of said grants, or of any portion of said grants, for a valuable consideration if any such there be. Said suit or suits shall be tried and adjudicated in like manner and by the same principles and rules of jurisprudence as other suits in equity are therein tried, with right to writ of error or appeal by either or any party as in other cases.'

In pursuance of this act, on August 30, 1889, a bill was filed in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Oregon against the Oregon Central Military Road Company, the California & Oregon Land Company, and certain named individuals. The bill, it may be said in a general way, charged that the road was not in fact constructed; that certificates of construction were fraudulently obtained from the governors of the state; that, in pursuance of such false certifications, a large number of tracts had been certified or patented to the state of Oregon for the benefit of the Oregon Central Military Road Company; that thereafter these lands were conveyed to certain of the individuals named as defendants, and by them finally to the California & Oregon Land Company; and, further, that these parties received the deeds with full knowledge of the fact that the road was not constructed as required by the act, and that the certificates were false, and fraudulently obtained. To this bill, on October 24, 1889, the

Page 35

California & Oregon Land Company filed two pleas and an answer in support thereof. The case was set down for hearing on the pleas, and on February 18, 1896, they were sustained, and the bill dismissed. From such decree of dismissal the United States appealed to this court. On May 25, 1891, the decision of the circuit court was reversed, (140 U. S. 599, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 988,) and the case remanded for further proceedings. The opinion of this court was announced by Mr. Justice Blatchford, and in that opinion will be found a full history of all the matters affecting the litigation up to that time. The conclusion reached was that the circuit court erred in not permitting the United States to reply to the pleas, and in dismissing the bill absolutely. After the mandate had been filed in the circuit court, issue was joined on the pleas, testimony taken, and on December 7, 1891, a decree was again entered sustaining the second plea and dismissing the bill of complaint, as to the defendant, the California & Oregon Land Company. From this decree an appeal was taken to the circuit court of appeals, by which court, on March 10, 1892, that decree was affirmed, (7 U. S. App. 128, 2 C. C. A. 419, 51 Fed. Rep. 629,) and from this decree of affirmance the United States appeal to this court.

Asst. Atty. Gen. Parker, for the United States.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 35-37 intentionally omitted]

Page 37

John F. Dillon, A. T. Britton, and A. B. Browne, for California & Oregon Land Co.

Jas. K. Kelly, for Dalles Military Road Co.

Mr. Justice BREWER, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court.

The burden of complaint in this case is that the circuit court erred in restricting the scope of the inquiry. The government sought to introduce testimony to show that the road was never in fact constructed, as required by the act of congress; and also that the certificates of the governors, made as provided by section 4 of the cat of 1864, were obtained by fraud and misrepresentation, as averred in the bill. But all of this testimony was excluded, and the inquiry limited to the single question whether the land company was a bona find purchaser.

The first plea of the land company recited the fact that three several certificates had been issued by governors of the state of Oregon, to the effect that the road had been completed as required by the act of congress, and added 'that each of said several certificates was made honestly and in good faith, and without any fraudulent intent or procurement or false representation by any person whomsoever.' But upon application to the circuit court this clause in the plea was stricken out, leaving it to contain simply an averment of the certificates of the governors; and, as these had been set out at length in the bill, there was no issue of fact presented by this plea. The other plea was that the land company was a

Page 38

purchaser in good faith,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
109 practice notes
  • State of Iowa v. Carr, 2,936
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
    • October 20, 1911
    ...345, 351, 69 F. 116, 122; State v. Flint & P.M.R. Co., 89 Mich. 481, 51 N.W. 103, 106; United States v. California & Oregon Land Co., 148 U.S. 31, 41, 13 Sup.Ct. 458, 37 L.Ed. 354; Carr v. United States, 98 U.S. 433, 438, 25 L.Ed. 209; United States v. Walker (C.C.) 139 F. 409, 411, 412, 41......
  • City of Clarksdale v. Harris, 34203
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • June 10, 1940
    ...253; Gonzales v. Williams, 192 U.S. 1, 48 L.Ed. 317; Qumby v. Conlau, 104 U.S. 420, 426, 26 L.Ed. 800, 802; U.S. v. California, etc., Co., 148 U.S. 31, 43; 37 L.Ed. 354, 360; Bales and G. Co. v. Payne, 194 U.S. 106, 109, 48 L.Ed. 894, 895; Foley v. Harrison, 15 How. 44, 14 L.Ed. 766; Provid......
  • United States v. Winona & St. P.R. Co., 564.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
    • May 6, 1895
    ...of the patents so as to affect innocent purchasers under the patentees. ' To the same effect are U.S. v. California & O. Land Co., 148 U.S. 31, 41, 13 Sup.Ct. 458, and U.S. v. Wenz, 34 F. 154. The equitable right of the United States to recover these lands is not exceptionally strong in thi......
  • Elliott v. Thompson, 6922
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Idaho
    • December 31, 1941
    ...States v. The Dalles Military Road Co., 37 L.Ed. 362, 148 U.S. 49, 13 S.Ct. 465; compare United States v. California & Oregon Land Co., 37 L.Ed. 354, 148 U.S. 31, 13 S.Ct. 458. --------- ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
109 cases
  • State of Iowa v. Carr, 2,936
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
    • October 20, 1911
    ...345, 351, 69 F. 116, 122; State v. Flint & P.M.R. Co., 89 Mich. 481, 51 N.W. 103, 106; United States v. California & Oregon Land Co., 148 U.S. 31, 41, 13 Sup.Ct. 458, 37 L.Ed. 354; Carr v. United States, 98 U.S. 433, 438, 25 L.Ed. 209; United States v. Walker (C.C.) 139 F. 409, 411, 412, 41......
  • City of Clarksdale v. Harris, 34203
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • June 10, 1940
    ...253; Gonzales v. Williams, 192 U.S. 1, 48 L.Ed. 317; Qumby v. Conlau, 104 U.S. 420, 426, 26 L.Ed. 800, 802; U.S. v. California, etc., Co., 148 U.S. 31, 43; 37 L.Ed. 354, 360; Bales and G. Co. v. Payne, 194 U.S. 106, 109, 48 L.Ed. 894, 895; Foley v. Harrison, 15 How. 44, 14 L.Ed. 766; Provid......
  • United States v. Winona & St. P.R. Co., 564.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
    • May 6, 1895
    ...of the patents so as to affect innocent purchasers under the patentees. ' To the same effect are U.S. v. California & O. Land Co., 148 U.S. 31, 41, 13 Sup.Ct. 458, and U.S. v. Wenz, 34 F. 154. The equitable right of the United States to recover these lands is not exceptionally strong in thi......
  • Elliott v. Thompson, 6922
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Idaho
    • December 31, 1941
    ...States v. The Dalles Military Road Co., 37 L.Ed. 362, 148 U.S. 49, 13 S.Ct. 465; compare United States v. California & Oregon Land Co., 37 L.Ed. 354, 148 U.S. 31, 13 S.Ct. 458. --------- ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT