United States v. Castillo-Rivera, No. 15-10615
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge, joined by JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, OWEN, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges, in full; SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge, joining in all except for footnote 1; HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge, joining in Part III.B only |
| Citation | 853 F.3d 218 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee v. Juan CASTILLO-RIVERA, Defendant–Appellant |
| Docket Number | No. 15-10615 |
| Decision Date | 30 March 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
54 practice notes
-
Consumer Fin. Prot. Bureau v. All Am. Check Cashing, Inc., No. 18-60302
...the same facts to the same law, control our own, and require us to deny the [requested] relief."); United States v. Castillo-Rivera , 853 F.3d 218, 227 (5th Cir. 2017) (en banc) (Higginbotham, J., concurring) ("To go forward and reduce the jurisprudence of stare decisis to a detailed code c......
-
United States v. Herrold, No. 14-11317
...in a non-generic manner, we require "that a defendant must ‘at least’ point to an actual state case." United States v. Castillo-Rivera , 853 F.3d 218, 223 (5th Cir. 2017) (en banc) (citing Gonzales v. Duenas-Alvarez , 549 U.S. 183, 193, 127 S.Ct. 815, 166 L.Ed.2d 683 (2007) ). But "even poi......
-
Hylton v. Sessions, No. 17-1567-ag
...the statute criminalizes on its face and undertake a more demanding and particular inquiry. See also United States v. Castillo-Rivera, 853 F.3d 218 (5th Cir. 2017) (en banc). Putting aside the practical challenges of implementing the Government’s approach (which are considerable), it finds ......
-
Alexis v. Barr, No. 18-60748
...articulated in Duenas-Alvarez where a court concludes a state statute is broader on its face." United States v. Castillo-Rivera , 853 F.3d 218, 223 (5th Cir. 2017) (emphasis added) (citing Duenas-Alvarez , 549 U.S. at 193, 127 S.Ct. 815 ). Because Alexis cannot demonstrate that the statute ......
Request a trial to view additional results
57 cases
-
Alexis v. Barr, No. 18-60748
...articulated in Duenas-Alvarez where a court concludes a state statute is broader on its face." United States v. Castillo-Rivera , 853 F.3d 218, 223 (5th Cir. 2017) (emphasis added) (citing Duenas-Alvarez , 549 U.S. at 193, 127 S.Ct. 815 ). Because Alexis cannot demonstrate that the statute ......
-
Williams v. Seidenbach, No. 18-31159
...circuit precedent. And because that is so, we have no occasion to reconsider our precedent. See United States v. Castillo-Rivera , 853 F.3d 218, 221 n.1 (5th Cir. 2017) (en banc) (refusing to revisit circuit precedent where it was "not necessary to our disposition of [the] case").III.We tur......
-
In re Hall, No. 19-10345
...is no "realistic probability ... that the [Government] would apply [the] statute to [such] conduct." United States v. Castillo-Rivera , 853 F.3d 218, 222 (5th Cir. 2017) (en banc) (quoting Gonzales v. Duenas-Alvarez , 549 U.S. 183, 193, 127 S.Ct. 815, 166 L.Ed.2d 683 (2007) ).This conclusio......
-
Salmoran v. Attorney Gen. United States, No. 17-2683
...proof of actual prosecution even where the crime of conviction contains broader language. See, e.g. , United States v. Castillo-Rivera , 853 F.3d 218, 223 (5th Cir. 2017) ("There is no exception to the actual case requirement articulated in Duenas-Alvarez where a court concludes a state sta......
Request a trial to view additional results