United States v. Certain Parcel of Land, Wayne Cty., Mich., 72-1134.
Decision Date | 19 September 1972 |
Docket Number | No. 72-1134.,72-1134. |
Citation | 466 F.2d 1295 |
Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant v. CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND IN WAYNE COUNTY, MICHIGAN, et al., Defendants-Appellees. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit |
Glen R. Goodsell, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff appellant; Kent Frizzell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Edmund B. Clark, William J. Kollins, George R. Hyde, Attys., Land & Natural Resources Div., U. S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Ralph B. Guy, Jr., U. S. Atty., Robert A. Rosenberg, Asst. U. S. Atty., Detroit, Mich., on brief.
Frederick D. Steinhardt, Detroit, Mich., for defendants-appellees; Bert Burgoyne, Walter B. Mason Jr., Travis, Warren, Nayer & Burgoyne, Detroit, Mich., on brief.
Before EDWARDS, PECK and KENT, Circuit Judges.
This is an appeal by the United States government from an order entered before a United States District Judge in the Eastern District of Michigan awarding $40,200 to the titleholders1 of approximately five acres of land condemned by the federal government for U. S. Interstate Highway 75.
Originally in 1960 the State of Michigan sought to condemn the same site as a portion of a 10-acre tract then completely owned by Jowan M. June, Inc. This condemnation suit, however, was terminated by Michigan because the Michigan statute did not allow for an enhancement set-off. Eighteen months later a condemnation suit was filed by the United States seeking the five acres still owned by June. It also sought set-off for the enhancement of the value of the other five acres. During the interval when neither suit was pending, the five. acres not needed for the highway had been conveyed by June, Inc. to Trauskle Investment Company to settle a prior debt. Trauskle was a separate corporation, incorporated eleven years before June, Inc., whose stockholders, directors and officers are the wives of three former stockholders, directors and officers of June, Inc.
The briefs in this case reveal no disputes of fact. The brief for the United States of America portrays the pretrial and trial proceedings accurately:
After trial United States District Judge Freeman held that the government completely failed to sustain its burden of proving that the transaction conveying the unconnected five acres to Trauskle was fraudulent, or that Trauskle Investment Co. was an alter ego for June. We affirm.
Over and above the facts already recited, the record demonstrates that the United States stipulated in part as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bodenhamer Bldg. Corp. v. Architectural Research Corp.
...and incorporated to perpetuate a fraud, the court may consider them a single legal entity. U.S. v. Certain Parcel of Land in Wayne County, Michigan, 466 F.2d 1295, 1297 (6th Cir.1972) (per curiam); Choate v. Landis Tool Co., 486 F.Supp. 774, 775 (E.D.Mich.1980). A court may find an identity......
-
Choate v. Landis Tool Co.
...670, 217 N.W.2d 910 (1974), unless they are employed as mere conduits or for purposes of fraud, U. S. v. Certain Parcel of Land, Wayne Cty., Mich., 466 F.2d 1295 (6th Cir. 1972). This of course means that, in general, even though Wyman-Gordon is the parent company of Jackson their separate ......