United States v. Clark, 13532.

Decision Date08 June 1954
Docket NumberNo. 13532.,13532.
CitationUnited States v. Clark, 122 F.Supp. 150 (N.D. Ala. 1954)
PartiesUNITED STATES v. CLARK.
CourtU.S. District Court — Northern District of Alabama

Frank M. Johnson, Jr., U. S. Atty., Birmingham, Ala., M. Lewis Gwaltney, Asst. U. S. Atty., Birmingham, Ala., for The United States.

Beddow & Jones, and Robert W. Gwin, Birmingham, Ala., for defendant.

GROOMS, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on motion to dismiss the indictment.

On November 27, 1953, the United States filed a complaint before the United States Commissioner in Birmingham, Alabama, alleging therein that on or about January 15, 1948, the defendant did willfully and knowingly attempt to defeat and evade a large part of the income tax due and owing by him for the calendar year ending December 31, 1947. After the filing of this complaint, defendant demanded a hearing before the United States Commissioner. This hearing was granted on February 2, 1954, and upon the completion thereof the defendant was discharged. The grand jury was in recess at the time but reconvened on February 23, 1954, and on February 26, 1954, returned the indictment sought to be dismissed.

The defendant contends that Count One of the indictment is barred by the six-year statute of limitations. Title 26, U.S.C.A. § 3748. The United States takes the position that the facts here presented bring this case within the following provision of the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • United States v. Florida
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Arkansas
    • August 18, 1958
    ...that district. It appears to us, therefore, that Count 1 was not barred by the statute of limitations." See, also, United States v. Clark, D.C.N.D.Ala., 122 F. Supp. 150. ...
  • United States v. Grayson, 27200 Summary Calendar.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • October 14, 1969
    ...that district. It appears to us, therefore, that Count 1 was not barred by the statute of limitations." See also: United States v. Clark, N.D. Ala.1954, 122 F.Supp. 150, 151; Sanseverino v. United States, 10 Cir. 1963, 321 F.2d 714, 715; Zacher v. United States, 8 Cir. 1955, 227 F.2d 219, 2......
  • United States v. Freeman, IP 58-CR-28.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Indiana
    • August 14, 1958
    ...115 F.Supp. 489; Zacher v. U. S., 8 Cir., 1955, 227 F.2d 219; United States v. Michael, 3 Cir., 1949, 180 F. 2d 55; United States v. Clark, D.C.Ala. 1954, 122 F.Supp. 150; United States v. Scully, D.C.N.Y.1954, 119 F.Supp. 225; Id., 2 Cir., 1955, 225 F.2d 113; White v. U. S., 5 Cir., 1954, ......