United States v. Collier

Citation493 F.2d 327
Decision Date27 March 1974
Docket NumberNo. 73-1796.,73-1796.
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leroy Frank COLLIER, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit

Neil H. Fink, Detroit, Mich., for appellant; Liberson, Fink, Feiler, Crystal & Burdick, Detroit, Mich., on brief.

William C. Ibershof, Asst. U. S. Atty., for appellee; Ralph B. Guy, Jr., U. S. Atty., Detroit, Mich., on brief.

Before WEICK and LIVELY, Circuit Judges, and ROSENSTEIN,* Senior Customs Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Collier was convicted after jury trial on the following counts: Count I, conspiracy to import cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 963; Count II, engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise relating to a conspiracy to import and possess cocaine in violation of 21 U. S.C. § 848; Count III, possession of cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Of the numerous issues raised on this appeal, only the two challenging the constitutionality of 21 U.S.C. § 848, and the sufficiency of the affidavit underlying the search warrant involved herein merit extended discussion. We affirm.

The facts are substantially as follows: In May, 1972, Douglas R. Kapp and Kathy Lucas, a/k/a Casey Lucas, were arrested at Miami International Airport, Miami, Florida, as they attempted to pass through customs when it was discovered that they were transporting six pounds of unadulterated cocaine. Shortly thereafter, complying with a request to cooperate, they informed customs officials that they had been hired by Collier to pick up the cocaine in South America and transport it to Detroit, Michigan, where they were to contact him at his home for delivery instructions.

Based on this information, customs officials decided to conduct a controlled delivery of the cocaine. Accordingly, Kapp and Lucas were flown to Detroit where Kapp made the prearranged telephone contact with Collier concerning the delivery of the cocaine. The ensuing exchange occurred during this conversation:

Kapp: I got hung up down there a little.
Collier: But you\'re cool?
Kapp: Yeh.
Collier: Okay beautiful. Tomorrow send Casey by with that and I\'ll send her back, send something back for you with her.

Thereafter, customs agent Back, in quest of a warrant for the search of Collier's home, submitted an affidavit which included the following statement:

"On May 31, 1972, at 1:25 a. m., a telephone call was placed by Kapp per his pre-arranged instruction with cocaine consignee, identified as Leroy Collier to telephone number (313) 355-2199. Kapp was instructed by Collier to have Kathy Sue Lucas deliver the cocaine to his house later on this date. Collier instructed Kapp that his address was 18470 George Washington St., Southfield, Michigan. At approximately 12:00 noon, May 31, 1972, Lucas will deliver the cocaine to Collier\'s address in the company of Agents of U.S. Customs."

On the basis of the affidavit, a Magistrate issued a warrant authorizing the search of Collier's home for the specified cocaine and any means and instrumentalities used for possessing or dispensing of such. Thereafter, agents permitted Lucas to deliver the cocaine to Collier at his home. After she departed, they entered the premises, conducted a thorough search and seized evidence including the controlled delivered cocaine.

Appellant claims that the statements contained in the affidavit to the effect that he told Kapp to have Lucas deliver "cocaine" to his house and also advised him of his address were totally erroneous. Inasmuch as this recital "struck at the heart of probable cause" and was the primary basis for the issuance of the search warrant, Collier alleges...

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • United States v. Martinez-Torres
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • January 11, 1983
    ...410-11 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1100, 97 S.Ct. 1123, 51 L.Ed.2d 549 (1977) (relying on Manfredi); accord: United States v. Collier, 493 F.2d 327, 329 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 831, 95 S.Ct. 56, 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974) (relying solely on Manfredi). In this specific context, T......
  • U.S. v. Lurz
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • December 10, 1981
    ...440 U.S. 907, 99 S.Ct. 1213, 59 L.Ed.2d 454 (1979); United States v. Collier, 358 F.Supp. 1351, 1355 (E.D.Mich.1973), affirmed, 493 F.2d 327 (6th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 831, 95 S.Ct. 56, 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974); United States v. Bergdoll, 412 F.Supp. 1308, 1318 As for Steedman's co......
  • United States v. Holman
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • March 1, 1980
    ...States v. Cravero, 545 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1100, 97 S.Ct. 1123, 51 L.Ed.2d 549 (1977); United States v. Collier, 493 F.2d 327 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 831, 95 S.Ct. 56, 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974); United States v. Kirk, 534 F.2d 1262 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. d......
  • U.S. v. Kirk
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • May 17, 1976
    ...States v. Manfredi, 488 F.2d 588 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 936, 94 S.Ct. 2651, 41 L.Ed.2d 240 (1974); United States v. Collier, 493 F.2d 327 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 831, 95 S.Ct. 56, 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974). We follow these It is well settled that "vagueness challenges ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT