United States v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Civ. A. No. 9574.

Decision Date16 May 1951
Docket NumberCiv. A. No. 9574.
Citation108 F. Supp. 581
PartiesUNITED STATES ex rel. LORENZO v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al.
CourtU.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania

No counsel.

MARSH, District Judge.

Joseph Lorenzo petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus and for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. It appears from an examination of the papers presented by the petitioner that he was tried by a jury in the Court of Quarter Sessions of Crawford County and found guilty on two counts of larceny. The Court imposed consecutive sentences of from 2½ to 5 years on each count. At the trial of the case, petitioner was represented by counsel.

It further appears from our examination of the records in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania which we secured from the Prothonotary of that Court, that the petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in that Court on August 24, 1949.1 On January 21, 1950, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania entered the following order:

"The Petitioner, Joseph Lorenzo, who is serving two consecutive sentences of two and a half to five years each in the Western Penitentiary, which sentences were imposed by the Court of Quarter Sessions of Crawford County on May 26, 1948, alleges in his petition that he was held incommunicado in the Crawford County Jail for eight days, and subjected to face duress and coercion. He also avers that he was denied the privilege of being present when the verdict was delivered. These allegations are denied by the District Attorney of Crawford County. This petition and answer is remitted to the Court of Quarter Sessions of Crawford County so that the petitioner may have an opportunity to establish by evidence the material averments of his petition and so that the Commonwealth may have an opportunity to rebut this evidence. After hearing the evidence that Court will remit the record with the court's findings of fact to this Court, without delay. By the Court."

Pursuant to the above order, the Court of Quarter Sessions of Crawford County held a hearing on February 9, 1950. Petitioner was again represented by counsel and was given an opportunity to prove his allegations affirmatively and to cross-examine the witnesses who appeared to deny the allegations of his petition. Based on the above hearing, the Court of Quarter Sessions of Crawford County filed the following findings of fact:

"1. Whether or not the relator was held incommunicado in the Crawford County Jail.
"We find as a fact that he was not.
"2. Whether or not the relator, Mr. Lorenzo, was subjected to duress and coercion.
"We find that he was not.
"3. Whether or not the relator, Mr. Lorenzo, was present when the verdict of the jury came in at Nos. 43-A and 43-B, May Sessions, 1948, in the Court of Quarter Sessions.
"We find that he was."

And in the discussion of these findings the court further stated that "there is no evidence to support the contentions of the relator on any of the three above issues except his own."

The above findings were filed on December 9, 1950 and on December 28, 1950 the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dismissed the petition. The petitioner filed a petition for reargument on ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • United States v. Cavell, Misc. No. 2034.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • January 14, 1957
    ...that which the record itself so clearly discloses; i.e., that the petition must be dismissed. United States ex rel. Lorenzo v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, D.C.W.D.Pa. 1951, 108 F.Supp. 581, affirmed, 3 Cir., 1951, 192 F.2d Relator complains for the first time in his petition in this court......
  • Woodington v. Mathews
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • September 20, 1968
    ...Supreme Court of the United States as well as the highest court of the state. Cases also applicable are United States ex rel. Lorenzo v. Pennsylvania, 108 F. Supp. 581 (D.Pa.1951), affirmed per curiam, 3 Cir., 192 F.2d 576; United States ex rel. Gawron v. Ragen, 211 F.2d 902 (7th Cir. 1954)......
  • United States v. Cavell, Civ. No. 15976.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • September 23, 1957
    ...which from the record before us clearly discloses that the petition for the writ must be dismissed. See United States ex rel. Lorenzo v. Com. of Pa., D.C.W.D.Pa. 1951, 108 F.Supp. 581, affirmed, 3 Cir., 1951, 192 F.2d The evidence alleged to have been suppressed by the Commonwealth at the t......
  • United States ex rel. Trowbridge v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Civ. A. No. 11006.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • December 18, 1952
    ...215, 70 S.Ct. 587, 94 L.Ed. 761; Com. of Pa. ex rel. Gibbs v. Ashe, D.C.W.D.Pa.1950, 93 F. Supp. 542; United States ex rel. Lorenzo v. Com. of Pa., D.C.W.D.Pa.1951, 108 F. Supp. 581, affirmed 1951, 192 F.2d The rule to show cause is discharged and the petition for writ for habeas corpus is ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT