United States v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Civ. A. No. 9574.
Decision Date | 16 May 1951 |
Docket Number | Civ. A. No. 9574. |
Citation | 108 F. Supp. 581 |
Parties | UNITED STATES ex rel. LORENZO v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
No counsel.
Joseph Lorenzo petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus and for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. It appears from an examination of the papers presented by the petitioner that he was tried by a jury in the Court of Quarter Sessions of Crawford County and found guilty on two counts of larceny. The Court imposed consecutive sentences of from 2½ to 5 years on each count. At the trial of the case, petitioner was represented by counsel.
It further appears from our examination of the records in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania which we secured from the Prothonotary of that Court, that the petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in that Court on August 24, 1949.1 On January 21, 1950, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania entered the following order:
Pursuant to the above order, the Court of Quarter Sessions of Crawford County held a hearing on February 9, 1950. Petitioner was again represented by counsel and was given an opportunity to prove his allegations affirmatively and to cross-examine the witnesses who appeared to deny the allegations of his petition. Based on the above hearing, the Court of Quarter Sessions of Crawford County filed the following findings of fact:
And in the discussion of these findings the court further stated that "there is no evidence to support the contentions of the relator on any of the three above issues except his own."
The above findings were filed on December 9, 1950 and on December 28, 1950 the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dismissed the petition. The petitioner filed a petition for reargument on ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United States v. Cavell, Misc. No. 2034.
...that which the record itself so clearly discloses; i.e., that the petition must be dismissed. United States ex rel. Lorenzo v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, D.C.W.D.Pa. 1951, 108 F.Supp. 581, affirmed, 3 Cir., 1951, 192 F.2d Relator complains for the first time in his petition in this court......
-
Woodington v. Mathews
...Supreme Court of the United States as well as the highest court of the state. Cases also applicable are United States ex rel. Lorenzo v. Pennsylvania, 108 F. Supp. 581 (D.Pa.1951), affirmed per curiam, 3 Cir., 192 F.2d 576; United States ex rel. Gawron v. Ragen, 211 F.2d 902 (7th Cir. 1954)......
-
United States v. Cavell, Civ. No. 15976.
...which from the record before us clearly discloses that the petition for the writ must be dismissed. See United States ex rel. Lorenzo v. Com. of Pa., D.C.W.D.Pa. 1951, 108 F.Supp. 581, affirmed, 3 Cir., 1951, 192 F.2d The evidence alleged to have been suppressed by the Commonwealth at the t......
-
United States ex rel. Trowbridge v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Civ. A. No. 11006.
...215, 70 S.Ct. 587, 94 L.Ed. 761; Com. of Pa. ex rel. Gibbs v. Ashe, D.C.W.D.Pa.1950, 93 F. Supp. 542; United States ex rel. Lorenzo v. Com. of Pa., D.C.W.D.Pa.1951, 108 F. Supp. 581, affirmed 1951, 192 F.2d The rule to show cause is discharged and the petition for writ for habeas corpus is ......