United States v. Cook, NO: 3:20CR19

Decision Date13 July 2020
Docket NumberNO: 3:20CR19
Citation472 F.Supp.3d 326
Parties UNITED STATES of America v. Christopher Casey COOK
CourtU.S. District Court — Northern District of Mississippi

Paul D. Roberts, U.S. Attorney's Office, Oxford, MS, for United States of America.

FPD, Federal Public Defender's Office, Merrill King Nordstrom, Hickman, Goza & Spragins, PLLC, Oxford, MS, for Christopher Casey Cook.

ORDER

Michael P. Mills, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presently before the Court is Defendant Christopher Casey Cook's ("Cook") Motion to Dismiss Indictment [36]. The United States ("the government") responded in opposition [39], and Cook replied [40]. Having reviewed these submissions, along with relevant authorities, the Court is now prepared to rule.

Facts

In 2018 Cook was prosecuted by the State of Mississippi for sale of a controlled substance. The case was widely publicized in the local news and public reference was made to Cook's local Calhoun County business. Cook was acquitted of all charges by a Calhoun County jury. Not content to quietly accept his victory, Cook made disparaging remarks on the internet about various players in his Calhoun County prosecution. He now finds himself defending a charge of internet harassment in Federal Court.

After his acquittal, Cook published a number of posts on his personal Facebook page about his experiences with the criminal justice system. An affidavit of Federal Bureau of Investigation Agent John Marsh specifically mentioned five Facebook posts made by Cook that Marsh believed supported a Criminal Complaint for cyberstalking. A review of these posts is in order. On June 27, 2019 Cook posted on his Facebook account:

I have a friend who had an issue in court. The date of her charge was changed for some reason. But she didn't have any documentation. So I asked if she took or received a lot of photos and she said yes. I asked her about the meta data and she said that her attorney said metadata can be altered. I asked if she posted photos on Facebook because they keep the photos on a "timeline" ... I doubt any party could alter Facebook's timeline .... unless they could be like Superman and reverse the spinning of the earth ... [that will be one heck of an "app for that!"] So my point is that a dated Facebook post of a photo could prove it was taken then or before ... .so this is how she can use Facebook in court. People that have secrets are equally concerned with Facebook because of the power it gives an average joe ... so socialize, enjoy, and post photos ... The great equalizer is the gun but Facebook runs a close 2nd ... and what you need is there ... ready to be revealed ... God willing ...

The government alleges Cook posted the following on Facebook on August 19, 20191 :

Cowards Creekmore2 and Mueller3 and cowardly judges. Cowardly crooked public defenders. Step down. Dixie Mafia likes to talk about making the wrong people mad. Well congratulations. You did. God gave me a good jury. Now I'm gonna give you what you have been giving my brothers and sisters ... you are finished. Because I'm coming and hell is coming with me. And I'm not just quoting a movie.

The voluble Cook made two separate posts on January 21, 2020, first:

** Image appearing to be a screenshot of information found on the internet regarding Mississippi Bureau of Narcotics officer Jon Lepicier, including an address and potential aliases **
You know that moment when your undercover aliases gets listed as Jon Cop?’. don't worry I'm not going to put the fam on here.... that karma though ...

This was followed by a post several hours later stating:

One poem then but that's it ok? Dedicated to Jamar "JP Smooth" Peterson ... I'm in the class of 07 At Oak Hill Academy But that's Jonathan Lepicier Jon Davis is my name I tried to convince Casey That I'm really Jon M dad ain't Bob he's like Richard Leon I became a new guy in 2013 That's when JL hit the scene. I'm here I'm there super coll and super Fun. Don't you think Avery goes well with Jun? My folks got like 12 boats and a house in Odessa. sounds like my wife's alias kinda Without the O or the A Ol buddy you know when you stopped at my restaurant ... started your lyin? I'll never forget when they told me later "I thought his name was Brian" The end

Finally, on January 23, 2020 Cook posted the following status update:

For those of you who read the stuff about my run ins with supposed law enforcers of the state of MS, I'm going to try to explain it without getting too wordy. The first MBN guy that got after me was someone I had known for a while. He had issues with substance abuse during service among many other "questionable things. He saw me playing guitar at church and formed an idea that I was dealing drugs and hookers and using church as a front. His own ideas. I found out how extremely naïve it can be to believe a badge because of the badge. But the town soaked the rumor up like a sponge. This MBN guy was removed due to his own conduct and that is where the second guy came in. He got an alias and went undercover in 2013. His name pretty much vanished from the internet. He is the one who arrested me in my bathroom. They searched my home. Didn't find any meth anywhere. Had a rubber stamp warrant with my name on it. And a copied stamp of local judge. Judge rushes a few words by me. (I had a right to a hearing which I didn't get, etc. He couldn't talk about the case). Didn't know anything about it.) .. I bonded out for $575.00, meaning they really didn't have evidence of a sale of meth but that was the charge. Of course MBN wanted to use my personal knowledge and facilities to set up others but I refused. When I got out of jail the story on WTVA news was a picture of me, a mugshot, with a history of dealing dope out of my motel, it said they had investigated me for 6 months and that I had 3.5 grams of meth on me. That's when it hit me that the guys in jail were right. I had been used as a distraction. I later found out what happened that day. July 19, 2018. Knowing there could be no evidence so no grand jury, I went to work getting after their butt while they send in more people hoping to get the evidence they had already charged and arrested and slandered by fake news without ... I uncovered a Ponzi scheme indictment system, where the prosecution and many defenders across MS work together. They self indict every possible felony whether evidenced or not. The forgeries are endless and obvious to the untrained eye. They see what lawyer you have. He could be on the team. They aren't likely to dismiss because the ace in the hole is cheating in court ... we caught 3 errors that would have overturned had they gotten conviction. Not to mention the arresting officer has everything he needs already. He knows his team has his back. He even signed for foreman and ADA. The DA over the whole district came to help put me away because he knew I had discovered his bottom up frivolous indictment system. (I termed it BUFI). I emailed him many times. They know it's wrong and they know getting away with murder here is easy ... but Facebook gets them extremely stressed out. Just go to the courthouse and as ADA, who I refer to as TJ ... he is very angry over my facebook. But it's all true and that will come to light soon enough. The rest of the scheme is ... hold back discovery 8 months to a year and write continuances without consent to take asway Speedy trial right, hoping defendant will plead, which they do 100% of the time ... minus one case ... mine. Now for me it's war. I'm sick of the corruption in this state. Sick of the scapegoating and unsolved murders, cover ups and fake news so that the whole system is too busy covering up to do any justice elsewhere. It's a mess and the people turn a blind eye here. Those that could help remain passive. Those that can't pay just get stuck in the thing or get stuck in drug court whether they do drugs or not and those that try them, get cheated and sent off. They pay probating and restitution to the county, the arresting, the appointed lawyer and whatever else they can tack on. My own loved ones won't acknowledge my truth half the time, so I don't care what anyone thinks. I uncovered the family of the arresting person. His real name, parents, grandparents, sisters, wife, nephew, properties owned, past phone numbers, aliases of the whole family, in laws ... which had him very puzzled as to how I did it. But I was nice enough to use poetry that only he would understand when posting what I knew. This guy has had affairs and paid numerous people to get something on me since early 2017, including his only witness, a real meth dealer. How ironic (sigh) ... I guess carrying the torch of his brother in arms and certainly angry that I make them look like little Johnny in the 4th grade. And God willing I'm going to take them out. With or without the help of the people. So far he has been willing and all credit be to him.

The Indictment [18] is a one and a half page document in which a grand jury found that Cook threatened Mississippi Bureau of Narcotics Agent Jon Lepicier by "revealing the address of, and names of family members" and "did threaten him and his family by posting:

"I uncovered the family of the arresting person. His real name, parents, grandparents, sisters, wife, nephew, properties owned, past phone numbers, aliases of the whole family, in laws, ... which had him very puzzled as to how I did it. He has taken down some resources and Facebook pages or changed them. But I was nice enough to use poetry that only he would understand when posting what I knew;" and
"And God willing I'm going to take them out;" [18]

Interestingly, when you compare the "posts" the government presented to the grand jury in the indictment, to the full posts reproduced above, it appears that the government "cherry picked" certain statements and re-arranged them in a different sequence and context to give the posts a more ominous effect.4 In the preceding and intervening sentences of the post that were cut...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • State v. Billings
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • December 20, 2022
    ...conduct, the exception for speech integral to criminal conduct shouldn't apply." (Citation omitted.)); United States v. Cook , 472 F. Supp. 3d 326, 332 (N.D. Miss. 2020) ("[T]he government has not alleged that [the defendant] ever directly contacted any of the subjects of his Facebook posts......
  • State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Shanahan
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • February 17, 2022
    ...the publication would create a risk of injury to M.R. or his family within the meaning of Sup.R. 45(E)(2). See United States v. Cook , 472 F.Supp.3d 326, 335 (N.D.Miss.2020) (discussing "doxing" and concluding that "sharing public information, while potentially offensive and disagreeable, d......
  • United States v. Bandy
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico
    • March 9, 2021
    ...and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 did not address cases in which the victim was unrelated to their stalker. See United States v. Cook, 472 F. Supp. 3d 326, 331 (N.D. Miss. 2020). A content-based restriction on protected speech must survive strict scrutiny. See United States v. Playboy Entm't ......
  • United States v. Mattia
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Arizona
    • September 22, 2021
    ... ... explicit photos-in this context- establishes a matter of ... public concern ... Cassidy ... and Cook are not inconsistent with the Court's decision ... In United States v. Cassidy, the defendant made ... public posts on Twitter ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT