United States v. Correia, 11174.
| Decision Date | 28 October 1953 |
| Docket Number | No. 11174.,11174. |
| Citation | United States v. Correia, 207 F.2d 595 (3rd Cir. 1953) |
| Parties | UNITED STATES v. CORREIA. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit |
J. J. Kilimnik, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.
D. Malcolm Anderson, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee.
Before MARIS, GOODRICH and KALODNER, Circuit Judges.
The defendant has appealed from his conviction in the district court upon an indictment charging him, an alien crewman to whom a permit to land temporarily in the United States had been issued, with having wilfully remained in the United States in excess of the number of days allowed in his permit, in violation of section 1282(c) of title 8 U.S.C.A. He attacks the indictment, the sufficiency of the evidence and the constitutionality of section 1357(a) (1) of title 8 U.S.C.A., under the authority of which immigration officers had interrogated the defendant as to his right to remain in the United States. We have considered the defendant's...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
United States v. Bowman
...The constitutionality of this provision has been consistently upheld. Fernandez v. United States, 9 Cir., 321 F.2d 283; United States v. Correia, 3 Cir., 207 F.2d 595; United States v. Montez-Hernandez, E.D.Cal., 291 F. Supp. 712. The brief detention of a motorist for the purpose of determi......
-
United States v. Montez-Hernandez
...motorists.6 This statute has been held constitutional. Fernandez v. United States, 321 F.2d 283 (9th Cir. 1963); United States v. Correia, 207 F.2d 595 (3d Cir. 1953). Therefore, if it was constitutional to question defendant as to his citizenship, it cannot be unconstitutional to ask for p......
-
U.S. v. Martinez, 74-1227
...507 F.2d 58 ... UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, ... Thomas Michael MARTINEZ, ... United States, 9 Cir., 321 F.2d 283; United States v. Correia, 3 Cir., ... 207 F.2d 595; United States v. Montez-Hernandez, E.D.Cal., ... ...
-
Tsimounis v. Holland, Civ. A. No. 19123.
...however, that the constitutionality of these sections was expressly raised by plaintiff's own counsel in the case of United States v. Correia, 1953, 3 Cir., 207 F.2d 595 where, in a per curiam opinion, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit upheld the constitutionality of ......