United States v. Crawford, 30632 Summary Calendar.
| Decision Date | 10 August 1971 |
| Docket Number | No. 30632 Summary Calendar.,30632 Summary Calendar. |
| Citation | 446 F.2d 1085 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph Calvin CRAWFORD, a/k/a J. C. Crawford, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
John F. Tomlin, Pecos, Tex. (Ct. Appt.) for defendant-appellant.
Seagal V. Wheatley, U. S. Atty., Haskell Shelton, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., Ralph E. Harris, Asst. U. S. Atty., El Paso, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before BELL, AINSWORTH, and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.
In conformity with the requirements established by Anders v. California, 1967, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, we have carefully considered this cause in its entirety, and conclude that there is no arguable merit in the appeal. It is therefore ordered, that the motion filed by John F. Tomlin, Esquire, for leave to withdraw as court-appointed counsel for Appellant is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See Local Rule 20. See also Minor v. United States, 5th Cir. 1971, 444 F.2d 521.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hawkins v. State
...F.2d 1018; Jackson v. Turner, 10 Cir., 442 F.2d 1303; United States ex rel. Randazzo v. Follette, 2 Cir., 444 F.2d 625; United States v. Crawford, 5 Cir., 446 F.2d 1085; United States v. Mills, 5 Cir., 446 F.2d 1397; Perry v. Texas, 5 Cir., 456 F.2d 879; United States v. King, 5 Cir., 456 F......
-
U.S. v. Andrade
...and the appeal is DISMISSED. See Local Rule 20. See also United States v. Minor, 5 Cir. 1971, 444 F.2d 521 and United States v. Crawford, 5 Cir. 1971, 446 F.2d 1085. * Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part ...
-
U.S. v. Sheppard
...merit. His conviction is AFFIRMED. 1 1 See Government of Canal Zone v. O'Connor, 460 F.2d 1004 (5th Cir. 1972); United States v. Crawford, 446 F.2d 1085 (5th Cir. 1971); United States v. Minor, 444 F.2d 521 (5th Cir. 1971); Lemus v. Government of Canal Zone, 443 F.2d 23 (5th Cir. 1971). See......
-
U.S. v. Reyna, 76-1692
...and the appeal is DISMISSED. See Local Rule 20. See also United States v. Minor, 5 Cir. 1971, 444 F.2d 521 and United States v. Crawford, 5 Cir. 1971, 446 F.2d 1085. * Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part ...