United States v. Crawford
Decision Date | 23 July 2021 |
Docket Number | 4:18-CR-104 |
Parties | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOE CRAWFORD |
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Mississippi |
On December 4, 2018, Joe Crawford was charged in a superseding indictment with two counts of selling firearms to a felon. Doc. #60. On June 9, 2021, following a three-day jury trial Crawford was convicted on both counts of the superseding indictment. Doc. #226. After being granted a requested extension to file a post-judgment motion, Crawford filed a motion for acquittal or, alternatively, a new trial on July 1, 2021. Doc. #248. The government timely responded to the motion. Doc. #254. Crawford did not reply. Because this Court concludes that Crawford's motion is without merit acquittal and a new trial will be denied.
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29(a) provides that “[a]fter the government closes its evidence or after the close of all the evidence, the court on the defendant's motion must enter a judgment of acquittal of any offense for which the evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction.” “Evidence is sufficient to support a conviction so long as any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” United States v. Gas Pipe, Inc., 997 F.3d 231, 240 (5th Cir. 2021) (quotation marks omitted). In applying this standard, “the court views all evidence, whether circumstantial or direct, in the light most favorable to the government, with all reasonable inferences and credibility choices to be made in support of the jury's verdict.” Id. (cleaned up).
Motions for new trials are governed by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33(a), which provides that a “court may vacate any judgment and grant a new trial if the interest of justice so requires.” “[A]ny error of sufficient magnitude to require reversal on appeal is an adequate ground for granting a new trial.” United States v Wall, 389 F.3d 457, 474 (5th Cir. 2004).
Prior to trial, Crawford and the government stipulated to the following facts:
Doc. #221 (paragraph numbering omitted).
At trial, the government introduced audio and visual recordings of interactions between Crawford and Louis West, a confidential informant (“CI”) for the government. See Doc. #224. West, Travis Tribble (an officer with the Cleveland Police Department), Dustin Blount (a special agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation), and Jason Price (an agent with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives) all testified. See Doc. #223. Crawford testified on his own behalf. Id. In the light most favorable to the government, this evidence shows:
In 2015 or 2016, West approached Tribble with the goal of becoming a confidential informant in order to “get the people that killed his son.” Doc. #252 at 170. At the time, Tribble did not have the “means to let [West] work.” Id. Sometime later, West was arrested for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Id. In December of 2017, West began working with Tribble as a CI making controlled buys. Id. at 171. In return for his work as a CI, West was paid and also “worked ... off” his charges. Id.
In early 2018, West informed Tribble that Leon Hughes, another convicted felon, “had a subject that was wanting to sell him a firearm.” Id. at 172. West arranged a controlled buy on February 17, 2018, at Wild Bill's in Boyle, Mississippi. Id. at 172-73, 175. During the buy, Hughes purchased the firearms from Crawford and gave them to West, who was also present. Id. at 176-77.
On March 1, 2018, West made a controlled buy of two firearms from Crawford, again at Wild Bill's. Id. at 178. This buy was also arranged through Hughes. Id.
On March 10, 2018, West called Crawford to arrange another buy. During the call, West said he wanted to purchase a fully automatic weapon and some handguns, including a .44 magnum and a Desert Eagle. West and Crawford also had the following exchange:
On March 19, West called Crawford again. West told Crawford he wanted “AK's and shit like that, or something automatic.” The conversation included the following exchange:
On March 20, 2018, West purchased from Crawford a Desert Eagle, .44 caliber pistol, Beretta, .40 caliber pistol, Federal Arms Corp. .308 caliber rifle, and Nodak Spud LLC 5.45x39mm caliber rifle. Doc. #221 at PagelD 988. The sale occurred again at Wild Bill's. Doc. #252 at 18687. During the sale, West asked to see one of the weapons. Gov't Exs. 7, 7a. Crawford and West then had the following exchange:
On June 13, 2018, West called Crawford to arrange another gun purchase. Gov't Exs. 8, 8a. The two discussed specific firearms and arranged to meet the next day at Wild Bill's. Id. However, after arriving at Wild Bill's, West and Crawford drove to a “secluded road” near Crawford's home. Doc. #252 at 282. During the sale, West and Crawford discussed the types of firearms being sold and also had the following exchange:
To continue reading
Request your trial