United States v. Dawson, 15987.
Citation | 350 F.2d 396 |
Decision Date | 13 August 1965 |
Docket Number | No. 15987.,15987. |
Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald Sterling DAWSON, aka Kenneth Sterling Dawson, Defendant-Appellant. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit |
Joseph P. Jordan and David W. Carroll, Cobourn, Yager, Smith & Falvey, Toledo, Ohio, for appellant.
John G. Mattimoe, Asst. U. S. Atty., Toledo, Ohio, for appellee, Merle M. McCurdy, U. S. Atty., Toledo, Ohio, on the brief.
Before PHILLIPS and EDWARDS, Circuit Judges, and McALLISTER, Senior Circuit Judge.
This is a direct appeal from a conviction for interstate transportation of a stolen automobile in violation of the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2312.
After perfecting this appeal and posting $20,000 surety bond, appellant fled the jurisdiction of the District Court. The bond has been forfeited. As of oral argument on this appeal, appellant had not been apprehended.
The appellee moves to dismiss this appeal, arguing that the facts recited indicate that the appeal is both frivolous and moot.
On consideration of appellee's motion and the oral arguments and briefs filed in this case, it is ordered that the appeal be dismissed thirty days from date on both grounds previously recited, unless in the meantime appellant has submitted himself to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court. Eisler v. United States, 338 U.S. 189, 69 S.Ct. 1453, 93 L.Ed. 1897 (1949), cert. dismissed, 338 U.S. 883, 70 S.Ct. 181, 94 L.Ed. 542 (1949); Smith v. United States, 94 U.S. 97, 24 L.Ed. 115 (1876); Stern v. United States, 249 F.2d 720 (C.A. 2, 1957).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Dorrough v. Estelle
...Court within 30 days that the appellant was available and subject to judgment, his appeal would be dismissed. Accord, United States v. Dawson, 6 Cir. 1965, 350 F.2d 396; see also Eisler v. United States, 1949, 338 U.S. 189, 69 S.Ct. 1453, 93 L.Ed. 1897 (removed from docket), 338 U.S. 883, 7......
-
Ruetz v. Lash
...(1st Cir. 1971); Johnson v. Laird, 432 F.2d 77 (9th Cir. 1970); United States v. Press, 401 F.2d 499 (3d Cir. 1968); United States v. Dawson, 350 F.2d 396 (6th Cir. 1965); Stern v. United States, 249 F.2d 720 (2d Cir. 1957, cert. denied, 357 U.S. 919, 78 S.Ct. 1360, 2 L.Ed.2d 1364 (1958); c......
-
U.S. v. Eighty Three Thousand Three Hundred Twenty Dollars ($83,320) in U.S. Currency and Forty Dollars ($40) in Canadian Currency
...95 S.Ct. 1173, 43 L.Ed.2d 377 (1975); Eisler v. United States, 338 U.S. 189, 69 S.Ct. 1453, 93 L.Ed. 1897 (1949); United States v. Dawson, 350 F.2d 396, 397 (6th Cir. 1965); Wayne v. Wyrick, 646 F.2d 1268 (8th Cir. 1981); Government of Virgin Islands v. James, 621 F.2d 588 (3rd Cir. 1980); ......
-
McKinney v. United States
...escaped); Bonahan v. State of Nebraska, 1887, 125 U.S. 692, 8 S.Ct. 1390, 31 L.Ed. 854, (appellant escaped); United States v. Dawson, 6 Cir., 1965, 350 F.2d 396, (appellant fled the jurisdiction, forfeiting By way of analogy we think the teaching of these cases is that the right of appeal s......