United States v. Day, 26816.

Citation442 F.2d 1034
Decision Date10 May 1971
Docket NumberNo. 26816.,26816.
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Orman Philip DAY, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)

Max A. Keller, and June Arden, Beverly Hills, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., David R. Nissen, Chief, Crim. Div., Larry S. Flax, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before MERRILL, KOELSCH and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The appellant was found guilty of refusing induction into the armed services in violation of 50 U.S.C.A. App. § 462. On appeal he asserts that the district court erred in refusing to hear his testimony concerning his reasons for refusing induction, and that the local board gave erroneous reasons for denying his claim for a selective conscientious objector classification.

In a prosecution for refusal to submit to induction the government need only show an awareness of the legal obligation and a deliberate purpose not to comply. United States v. Boardman, 419 F.2d 110 (1st Cir. 1969), cert. denied 397 U.S. 991, 90 S.Ct. 1124, 25 L.Ed.2d 398 (1970); United States v. Rabb, 394 F.2d 230 (3rd Cir. 1968). Evidence of appellant's good faith in challenging a law he believed to be wrong was properly held to be inadmissible. Harris v. United States, 412 F.2d 384 (9th Cir. 1969).

Appellant's request for classification as a conscientious objector was based upon selective opposition to specific wars rather than an opposition to participation in war in any form. The classification was properly denied. Gillette v. United States, 400 U.S. 955, 91 S.Ct. 351, 27 L.Ed.2d 263 (1971).

The decision of the district court is affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • United States v. Hill, 73 CR 519.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • January 16, 1974
    ...United States v. Jacques, 463 F.2d 653 (1st Cir. 1972); United States v. Figurell, 462 F.2d 1080 (3d Cir. 1972); United States v. Day, 442 F.2d 1034 (9th Cir. 1971); United States v. Rabb, 394 F.2d 230 (3d Cir. Although the defense of lack of specific intent as a result of mental incompeten......
  • United States v. Bulger, CR71-1039.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
    • March 2, 1972
    ...of his faculties and that he intended not to submit to induction. This is sufficient to show the necessary intent. United States v. Day, 442 F.2d 1034 (9th Cir. 1971). VALIDITY OF THE ORDER TO Bulger's selective service file does not contain a form DD-98 (security questionnaire) completed b......
  • United States v. Gonzalez, 72-CR-733.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • October 11, 1973
    ...United States v. Jacques, 463 F.2d 653 (1st Cir. 1972); United States v. Figurell, 462 F.2d 1080 (3d Cir. 1972); United States v. Day, 442 F.2d 1034 (9th Cir. 1971); United States v. Rabb, 394 F.2d 230 (3d Cir. 1968). The government has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that he received noti......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT