United States v. Deleon

• Decision Date: 07 March 2018
• Docket Number: No. CR 15–4268 JB,CR 15–4268 JB
• Citation: United States v. Deleon, 287 F.Supp.3d 1187 (D. N.M. 2018)
• Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Angel DELEON, Joe Lawrence Gallegos, Edward Troup, a.k.a. "Huero Troup," Leonard Lujan, Billy Garcia, a.k.a. "Wild Bill," Eugene Martinez, a.k.a. "Little Guero," Allen Patterson, Christopher Chavez, a.k.a. "Critter," Javier Alonso, a.k.a. "Wineo," Arturo Arnulfo Garcia, a.k.a. "Shotgun," Benjamin Clark, a.k.a. "Cyclone," Ruben Hernandez; Jerry Armenta, a.k.a. "Creeper," Jerry Montoya, a.k.a. "Boxer," Mario Rodriguez, a.k.a. "Blue," Timothy Martinez, a.k.a. "Red," Mauricio Varela, a.k.a. "Archie," a.k.a. "Hog Nuts," Daniel Sanchez, a.k.a. "Dan Dan," Gerald Archuleta, a.k.a. "Styx," a.k.a. "Grandma," Conrad Villegas, a.k.a. "Chitmon," Anthony Ray Baca, a.k.a. "Pup," Robert Martinez, a.k.a. "Baby Rob," Roy Paul Martinez, a.k.a. "Shadow," Christopher Garcia, Carlos Herrera, a.k.a. "Lazy," Rudy Perez, a.k.a. "Ru Dog," Andrew Gallegos, a.k.a. "Smiley," Santos Gonzalez; Paul Rivera, Shauna Gutierrez, and Brandy Rodriguez, Defendants.
• Court: U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico

287 F.Supp.3d 1187

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,

v.Angel DELEON, Joe Lawrence Gallegos, Edward Troup, a.k.a. "Huero Troup," Leonard Lujan, Billy Garcia, a.k.a. "Wild Bill," Eugene Martinez, a.k.a. "Little Guero," Allen Patterson, Christopher Chavez, a.k.a. "Critter," Javier Alonso, a.k.a. "Wineo," Arturo Arnulfo Garcia, a.k.a. "Shotgun," Benjamin Clark, a.k.a. "Cyclone," Ruben Hernandez; Jerry Armenta, a.k.a. "Creeper," Jerry Montoya, a.k.a. "Boxer," Mario Rodriguez, a.k.a. "Blue," Timothy Martinez, a.k.a. "Red," Mauricio Varela, a.k.a. "Archie," a.k.a. "Hog Nuts," Daniel Sanchez, a.k.a. "Dan Dan," Gerald Archuleta, a.k.a. "Styx," a.k.a. "Grandma," Conrad Villegas, a.k.a. "Chitmon," Anthony Ray Baca, a.k.a. "Pup," Robert Martinez, a.k.a. "Baby Rob," Roy Paul Martinez, a.k.a. "Shadow," Christopher Garcia, Carlos Herrera, a.k.a. "Lazy," Rudy Perez, a.k.a. "Ru Dog," Andrew Gallegos, a.k.a. "Smiley," Santos Gonzalez; Paul Rivera, Shauna Gutierrez, and Brandy Rodriguez, Defendants.

No. CR 15–4268 JB

United States District Court, D. New Mexico.

Filed March 7, 2018

John C. Anderson, United States Attorney, Maria Ysabel Armijo, Randy M. Castellano, Matthew Beck, Assistant United States Attorneys, United States Attorney's Office, Las Cruces, New Mexico, Attorneys for the Plaintiff.

Richard Sindel, Sindel, Sindel & Noble, P.C., Clayton, Missouri, and Brock Benjamin, Benjamin Law Firm, El Paso, Texas, Attorneys for DefendantJoe Lawrence Gallegos.

Patrick J. Burke, Patrick J. Burke, P.C., Denver, Colorado, and Cori Ann Harbour–Valdez, The Harbour Law Firm, P.C., El Paso, Texas, Attorneys for DefendantEdward Troup.

Russel Dean Clark, Las Cruces, New Mexico, Attorney for DefendantLeonard Lujan.

James A. Castle, Castle & Castle, P.C., Denver, Colorado, and Robert R. Cooper, Albuquerque, New Mexico, Attorneys for DefendantBilly Garcia.

Douglas E. Couleur, Douglas E. Couleur, P.A., Santa Fe, New Mexico, Attorneys for DefendantEugene Martinez.

Phillip A. Linder, The Linder Firm, Dallas, Texas, and Jeffrey C. Lahann, Las Cruces, New Mexico, Attorneys for DefendantAllen Patterson.

John L. Granberg, Granberg Law Office, El Paso, Texas, and Orlando Mondragon, El Paso, Texas, Attorneys for DefendantChristopher Chavez.

Nathan D. Chambers, Nathan D. Chambers, LLC, Denver Colorado, and Noel Orquiz, Deming, New Mexico, Attorneys for DefendantJavier Alonso.

Scott Moran Davidson, Albuquerque, New Mexico, and Billy R. Blackburn, Albuquerque, New Mexico, Attorneys for DefendantArturo Arnulfo Garcia.

Stephen E. Hosford, Stephen E. Hosford, P.C., Arrey, New Mexico, and Jerry Daniel Herrera, Albuquerque, New Mexico, Attorneys for DefendantBenjamin Clark.

Pedro Pineda, Las Cruces, New Mexico, Attorney for DefendantRuben Hernandez.

Gary Mitchell, Mitchell Law Office, Ruidoso, New Mexico, Attorney for DefendantJerry Armenta.

Larry A. Hammond, Osborn Maledon, P.A., Phoenix, Arizona, and Margaret Strickland, McGraw & Strickland, Las Cruces, New Mexico, Attorneys for DefendantJerry Montoya.

Steven M. Potolsky, Jacksonville Beach, Florida, and Santiago D. Hernandez, Law Office of Santiago D. Hernandez, El Paso, Texas, Attorneys for DefendantMario Rodriguez.

Jacqueline K. Walsh, Walsh & Larranaga, Seattle, Washington, and Ray Velarde, El Paso, Texas, Attorneys for DefendantTimothy Martinez.

Joe Spencer, El Paso, Texas, and Mary Stillinger, El Paso, Texas, Attorneys for DefendantMauricio Varela.

Amy E. Jacks, Law Office of Amy E. Jacks, Los Angeles, California, and Richard Jewkes, El Paso, Texas, Attorneys for DefendantDaniel Sanchez.

George A. Harrison, Las Cruces, New Mexico, Attorney for DefendantGerald Archuleta.

B.J. Crow, Crow Law Firm, Roswell, New Mexico, Attorney for DefendantConrad Villegas.

Theresa M. Duncan, Duncan, Earnest, LLC, Albuquerque, New Mexico, and Marc M. Lowry, Rothstein Donatelli, LLP, Albuquerque, New Mexico, Attorneys for DefendantAnthony Ray Baca.

Charles J. McElhinney, McElhinney Law Firm, LLC, Las Cruces, New Mexico, Attorney for DefendantRobert Martinez.

Marcia J. Milner, Las Cruces, New Mexico, Attorney for DefendantRoy Paul Martinez.

Christopher W. Adams, Charleston, South Carolina, and Amy Sirignano, Law Office of Amy Sirignano, P.C., Albuquerque, New Mexico, Attorneys for DefendantChristopher Garcia.

William R. Maynard, El Paso, Texas, and Carey Corlew Bhalla, Law Office of Carey C. Bhalla, LLC, Albuquerque, New Mexico, Attorneys for DefendantCarlos Herrera.

Justine Fox–Young, Albuquerque, New Mexico, and Ryan J. Villa, Albuquerque, New Mexico, Attorneys for DefendantRudy Perez.

Lisa Torraco, Albuquerque, New Mexico, and Donavon A. Roberts, Albuquerque, New Mexico, Attorneys for DefendantAndrew Gallegos.

Erlinda O. Johnson, Law Office of Erlinda Ocampo Johnson, LLC, Albuquerque, New Mexico, Attorneys for DefendantSantos Gonzalez.

Angela Arellanes, Albuquerque, New Mexico, Attorneys for DefendantShauna Gutierrez.

Jerry A. Walz, Walz and Associates, Albuquerque, New Mexico, Attorneys for DefendantBrandy Rodriguez.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGETHIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i)DefendantSantos Gonzales' Motion for Production of Alleged Co–Conspirator Statements, Pre–Trial Hearing on Their Admissibility Pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(2)(E), filedMay 9, 2017(Doc. 1141)("Gonzales Motion");(ii)DefendantRudy Perez's Motion for Production of Alleged Co–Conspirator Statements and for Pre–Trial Hearing on Their Admissibility, filed August 21, 2017(Doc. 1228)("Perez Motion");(iii) the Opposed Motion for Specification of Co–Conspirator Statements and a Pre–Trial Hearing on the Statements' Admissibility, filed October 6, 2017(Doc. 1303)("C.Garcia Motion");(iv)Motion to Prevent the Admission of Statements of Non–Testifying Codefendants Implicating DefendantBilly Garcia and for an Order for the Government to Specify Such Statements Prior to Trial, filed October 10, 2017(Doc. 1307)("B.Garcia Motion");(v)Motion for James Hearing and Determination of Co–Conspirator Statements Admissibility at a Pre–Trial Hearing, filed October 13, 2017)(Doc. 1317)("J.Gallegos Motion");(vi)DefendantShauna Gutierrez' Opposed Motion for a James Hearing, filed October 13, 2017(Doc. 1321)("Gutierrez Motion");(vii)Motion in Limine to Exclude Statement of Cooperating Government Witnesses, filed November 30, 2017(Doc. 1514)("Perez MIL");(viii)Opposed Motion in Limine to Exclude Co–Defendant's [sic] Statements, filed December 1, 2017(Doc. 1517)("C.Garcia MIL");(ix)DefendantAnthony Ray Baca's Motion in Limine to Prohibit the Government From Questioning Jerry Armenta About DefendantAnthony Ray Baca's Involvement in Counts 6 & 7, filed December 4, 2017(Doc. 1540)("Baca MIL");(x)DefendantDaniel Sanchez's Motion in Limine to Preclude the Admission of Un–Confronted, Out of Court Statements Proffered by the Government at the James Hearing, filed January 8, 2018(Doc. 1616)("Sanchez MIL"); and (xi) the Joint Motion to Renew Motion to SeverDefendants Charged with Offenses in Counts 6 and 7, filed January 21, 2018(Doc. 1664)("Severance Motion").The Court held hearings on November 27–29, 2017, December 8, 2017, December 19–20, 2017, and January 9, 2018.See Transcript of Hearing (held November 27, 2017), filed December 6, 2017(Doc. 1545)("Nov.27 Tr."); Transcript of Hearing (held November 28, 2017), filed December 6, 2017(Doc. 1546)("Nov.28 Tr."); Transcript of Hearing (held November 29, 2017), filed December 6, 2017(Doc. 1547)("Nov.29 Tr."); Transcript of Hearing (held December 8, 2017), filed December 15, 2017(Doc. 1577)("Dec.8 Tr."); Transcript of Hearing (held December 19, 2017), filed January 4, 2018(Doc. 1608)("Dec.19 Tr."); Transcript of Hearing (held December 20, 2017), filed January 5, 2018(Doc. 1610)("Dec.20 Tr."); Transcript of Hearing (held January 9, 2018), filed January 24, 2018(Doc. 1683)("Jan.9 Tr.").The primary issues are whether the out-of-court statements—largely statements of DefendantsDaniel Sanchez, Anthony Ray Baca, Carlos Herrera, and Rudy Perez, and of cooperating Defendants and other inmates—that Plaintiff United States of America intends to offer in evidence at trial to prove the matterasserted: (i) can be admitted notwithstanding the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America's Confrontation Clause; (ii) can be admitted for their truth, because—as coconspirator statements made during and in furtherance of the conspiracy, seeFed. R. Evid. 801(d)(2)(E) —they are not hearsay; (iii) can be admitted, even though they are hearsay, as statements against penal interest made by an unavailable declarant, seeFed. R. Evid. 804(b)(3);(iv) can be admitted for their truth, because, as admissions offered against Baca, Herrera, or Perez, seeFed. R. Evid. 801(d)(2)(A), they are not hearsay; (v) can be admitted, with a limiting instruction, in a joint trial if the statement is nontestimonial, incriminates multiple Defendants, and is admissible against some—but not all—of those Defendants; and (vi) necessitate sufficiently many limiting instructions that the Court should alter how the case should be tried.The Court analyzes individually the out-of-court statements at issue and concludes that it can admit nontestimonial statements that are admissible against only some of the Defendants if it gives a limiting instruction.While there will be multiple limiting instructions, the United States' willingness to Bruton-ize¹ Baca's, Herrera's, and Perez' statements removes statements that one Defendant made and that directly incriminate other Defendants from the trial, so the jury will never hear those statements.²Thus, while the Defendants are entitled to limiting instructions under the Federal Rules of Evidence, there is not much, if anything, that the jury could meaningfully use against the non-declarant Defendants.Using the statements in this way does not violate the Fifth or Sixth Amendments, and the Defendants will...