United States v. Dennis
Decision Date | 19 October 1978 |
Docket Number | No. 78-142 CR (3).,78-142 CR (3). |
Citation | 458 F. Supp. 197 |
Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Willie H. DENNIS, Defendant. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Missouri |
Stephen B. Higgins and Georgia M. Goslee, Asst. U. S. Attys., U. S. Dept. of Justice, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.
Irl B. Baris, St. Louis, Mo., for defendant.
This matter is before the Court upon the Court's own motion to consider the dismissal of Count I of the indictment herein. Said count charges defendant with violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) which provides:
It shall be unlawful for any person employed by or associated with any enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce, to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise's affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt.
Defendant is an employee of the General Motors Assembly Division, General Motors Corporation, which is alleged to be an enterprise affecting interstate commerce. The government charges that defendant participated in the conduct of the enterprise's affairs through the collection of unlawful debts, as defined by 18 U.S.C. § 1961(6). Defendant was not an officer of General Motors Corporation. The debts that he is alleged to have unlawfully collected were incurred by fellow employees at the General Motors Assembly Division as a result of allegedly borrowing funds at usurious rates from defendant.
The issue which the indictment raises herein is whether the collection of unlawful debts by an employee from co-employees on the premises of an enterprise affecting interstate commerce constitutes participation in the enterprise's affairs through the collection of unlawful debts. The Court concludes that it does not.
The court also stated that offenses committed in the course of employment satisfied the relationship required by the statute.
Other courts have placed a more stringent interpretation upon the statutory requirement that the defendant participate in the conduct of the enterprise's affairs through the prohibited activity. In United States v. Nerone, 563 F.2d 836 (7th Cir. 1977), defendants were charged with participating in the operation of an illegal gambling business; use of extortionate means to collect a gambling debt; use of a deadly weapon in an assault upon a federal officer; and conducting the affairs of Maple Manor, Inc. through a pattern of racketeering activity and/or through collection of an unlawful debt. The evidence adduced showed that an individual operated a casino gambling operation in a mobile home located in a mobile home park which was operated by Maple Manor, Inc. A number of this corporation's board of directors were directly involved in the gambling operation. Nevertheless, the court determined that 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) had not been violated:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Engl v. Berg, Civ. A. No. 80-4065.
...of union funds for personal use does not constitute conduct of union affairs through racketeering activity); United States v. Dennis, 458 F.Supp. 197 (E.D.Mo.1978) (collection of unlawful debts on property of General Motors Corp. does not constitute conduct of affairs of General Motors thro......
-
United States v. Castellano
...Where a defendant was acting illegally on his own, the Eighth Circuit refused to allow his prosecution under RICO. United States v. Dennis, 458 F.Supp. 197 (E.D.Mo.1978) (defendant who extorted money from coworkers in corporation's parking lot was not participating in the affairs of the cor......
-
US v. Biaggi
...456 U.S. 935, 102 S.Ct. 1991, 72 L.Ed.2d 455 (1982); see United States v. Cariello, 536 F.Supp. 698 (D.N.J.1982); United States v. Dennis, 458 F.Supp. 197 (D.Mo.1978). Even if Biaggi were correct, his acts of extortion actually did benefit Wedtech, inasmuch as he is alleged to have solicite......
-
U.S. v. Cauble
...enterprise, not the predicate acts), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 949, 102 S.Ct. 2020, 72 L.Ed.2d 474 (1982).20 See, e.g., United States v. Dennis, 458 F.Supp. 197 (E.D.Mo.1978) (defendant's employment by General Motors Assembly Division and collection of unlawful debts on its premises failed to ......