United States v. Emery, 9819.
Decision Date | 12 August 1949 |
Docket Number | No. 9819.,9819. |
Citation | 85 F. Supp. 354 |
Parties | UNITED STATES v. EMERY et al. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of California |
Abe I. Levy, Christian V. Murray, Los Angeles, Cal., for the plaintiff.
Daniel Dougherty, Los Angeles, Cal., for the defendant.
The action is for treble damages, restitution and injunction. The defendants have filed a motion to dismiss. They attack the validity of the Housing and Rent Act of 1947 as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1881 et seq., and the right to institute the action.
I do not agree with the recent decision in the case of Woods v. Shoreline Cooperative Apartments, Inc., D.C., 84 F. Supp. 660, by the District Court for the Eastern Division of Illinois, wherein the Housing and Rent Act of 1949, 50 U.S.C. A.Appendix, § 1881 et seq., was held unconstitutional. The present Act follows the pattern of other Rent Acts. The war emergency still exists. The United States Supreme Court has held repeatedly that war powers may be exercised for a reasonable number of years after the actual "shooting war" ends, in order to take care of the economic dislocations which follow each war. Fleming v. Mohawk etc. Lbr. Co., 1947, 331 U.S. 111, 67 S.Ct. 1129, 91 L.Ed. 1375.
In Lewis v. Anderson, Secretary of Agriculture, 9 Cir., 72 F.Supp. 119, 120, involving sugar controls, I held that administrative penalties could be imposed on retailers for violating sugar controls after the "shooting war" had ended. I used this language, which is as applicable today as it was on June 9, 1947:
Th...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United States v. Bize
...the Act should not be considered to be void. Actually, this court regards the reasoning and opinion of Judge Yankwich in United States v. Emery, D.C.Cal., 85 F.Supp. 354, as well founded and Finally, in each of cases numbered 39-49 and 51-49, the motion demands the striking "from the petiti......
-
Woods v. Griggs, 856.
...the duration of that emergency. * * * the war power does not necessarily end with the cessation of hostilities." See also United States v. Emery, D.C., 85 F.Supp. 354 and the district judge's sharp disagreement with Woods v. Shoreline Cooperative Apartments, Inc., D.C., 84 F.Supp. 660, reli......