United States v. Fay
Decision Date | 06 April 1960 |
Citation | 189 F. Supp. 151 |
Parties | UNITED STATES of America ex rel. John SADOWY, Petitioner v. Edward M. FAY, as Warden of Greenhaven Prison, Respondent. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York |
John Sadowy, pro se.
No appearance for respondent.
I am in receipt of a letter from the petitioner with an enclosure thereto which is denominated by the petitioner as a "Petition for a certificate of probable cause".
The petitioner goes on to allege that there was an issue as to identification before the trial court that was not properly reviewed by the appellate courts of New York.
It is, of course, not incumbent upon a District Court of the United States to review a state court record merely because of a conclusory allegation of a state prisoner that he has been deprived of his constitutional rights. Such conclusory allegation is all that was present in the original petition or is present in the instant petition for a certificate of probable cause and petitioner's letter enclosing said petition.
Any application which may be deemed to be before me for a petition for any writ of habeas corpus on grounds other than the ground covered by my original Memorandum is denied. A certificate of probable cause, limited to the ground covered in my original Memorandum, is hereby issued. A certificate of probable cause on any other ground is denied. If any further leave to proceed in forma pauperis may be deemed necessary, it is hereby granted.
In the original petition the petitioner requested the appointment of counsel. Obviously, I did not deem cou...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United States v. McDevitt
...v. United States, 54 App. D.C. 46, 293 F. 1013, 34 A.L.R. 145; Marks v. United States, 260 F.2d 377 (C.A.10); United States ex rel. Sadowy v. Fay, 189 F.Supp. 151 (S.D.N.Y.). The present appeal, however, does not involve a case where the operator attempted to testify, as an expert, as to wh......
-
United States v. Fay
...granted petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis but denied issuance of the writ with a memorandum opinion which states 189 F.Supp. 151: "The only ground raised by the petitioner to support the contention that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws of the Uni......