United States v. Felder
| Docket Number | 19-897 |
| Decision Date | 31 March 2021 |
The Second Circuit affirmed defendant's conviction of two counts of carjacking resulting in death, multiple counts of substantive and conspiratorial Hobbs Act robbery, and related firearms offenses. The court concluded that defendant's challenges to the district court's instructions on the mens rea and causation elements of carjacking resulting in death, both fail because these claims lack merit and the purported errors were in any event harmless. The court also concluded that defendant's...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
49 cases
-
United States v. Aiyer
...apply equally whether a [proffered] witness is testifying based on personal knowledge or special expertise." United States v. Felder , 993 F.3d 57, 71 (2d Cir. 2021) (citing United States v. Romano , 794 F.3d 317, 330 (2d Cir. 2015) ).Aiyer's first evidentiary challenge—that his competitive......
-
United States v. Lauria
...identification of Fourth Amendment error does not automatically entitle a defendant to the suppression of evidence." United States v. Felder, 993 F.3d 57, 75 (2d Cir. 2021). Rather, "as with any remedial device, the application of the [exclusionary] rule has been restricted to those areas w......
-
United States v. Avenatti
...legal standard"; (2) that his requested instruction "was correct in all respects"; and (3) "ensuing prejudice." United States v. Felder, 993 F.3d 57, 63 (2d Cir. 2021) (internal quotation marks omitted). Put another way, an omitted instruction will warrant relief from conviction only "if (1......
-
United States v. Taylor
...1619, 48 L.Ed.2d 71 (1976) (holding that the government could obtain bank records through a subpoena); see also United States v. Felder , 993 F.3d 57, 75–76 (2d Cir. 2021) ("Prior to Carpenter , all five courts of appeals to have considered the question relied on [the third-party] doctrine ......
Get Started for Free