United States v. Folse
Decision Date | 05 October 2017 |
Docket Number | No. CR 15–2485 JB,CR 15–2485 JB |
Citation | 301 F.Supp.3d 1037 |
Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Kevin FOLSE, Defendant. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico |
Samuel A. Hurtado, William J. Pflugrath, United States Attorney's Office, Albuquerque, NM, for Plaintiff.
Mary V. Carmack–Altwies, Mary V. Carmack Law PC, Albuquerque, NM, for Defendant.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on DefendantKevin Folse's Formal Objections to Presentence Report, filed May 15, 2017(Doc. 223)("Objections").The primary issues are: (i) whether DefendantKevin Folse qualifies for a "career offender" sentencing enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 based on his prior felony convictions for aggravated battery with a deadly weapon and possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, as well as the two carjacking convictions rendered in this case; (ii) whether the Court should apply a 2–level obstruction-of-justice enhancement for witness intimidation under U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1; and (iii) whether the Court should apply a 2–level obstruction-of-justice enhancement for reckless endangerment during flight under U.S.S.G. § 3C1.2.The Court concludes that all three enhancements apply.First, Folse qualifies as a career offender, because his carjacking conviction in this case is a "crime of violence" under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a), his prior aggravated battery with a deadly weapon conviction was a "crime of violence" under U.S.S.G. 4B1.2(a), and his prior possession of marijuana with intent to distribute conviction is a controlled substance offense under § 4B1.2(b).Second, Folse qualifies for the obstruction-of-justice enhancement, because he asked "Creeper" to tell a potential witness to go "M.I.A." prior to trial.Third, he qualifies for the obstruction-of-justice reckless-endangerment-during-flight enhancement, because Folse put pedestrians and other drivers at substantial risk of serious injury or death while fleeing police when he threw a gun out of a moving vehicle, drove at high speeds, and ran both a red light and a stop sign.
The Court takes its factual account from the Presentence Investigation Report, filed May 10, 2017(Doc. 220)("PSR").Later, the Court will note Folse's factual objections and, where necessary to determine whether the disputed sentencing enhancements apply, the Court will resolve them.
Between June 30 and July 2, 2015, Albuquerque Police Department("APD") detectives searched for Folse, a.k.a. "Criminal," who was fleeing from law enforcement and had "committed various violent crimes" during flight.PSR ¶ 5, at 4.On July 2, 2015, APD officers stopped a stolen black Cadillac, which Folse "had been driving a few hours earlier."1PSR ¶ 6, at 4.Although the officers determined that Folse was not the driver, the driver stated that he had just purchased the vehicle from Folse and that Folse was located at 1825 Pitt Street NE in Albuquerque, New Mexico.SeePSR ¶ 6, at 4.APD dispatched officers to the residence, where they observed an individual matching Folse's description close the front door.SeePSR ¶ 7, at 4.The officers failed, however, to positively identify the man.SeePSR ¶ 7, at 4.An APD detective then proceeded to the back of the residence and observed an individual—later identified as Valente Estrada—looking out the back window.SeePSR ¶ 7, at 4.Estrada said the front door was "barricaded" and that he was alone in the residence.PSR ¶ 8, at 5.
Shortly thereafter, the man first observed at the front door—later identified as Folse—"had [Estrada] join four other individuals in the bedroom with Angela Murray," Folse's girlfriend,2 where Folse "proceeded to take all of their cellular telephones and remove[ ] their batteries...."PSR ¶ 8, at 5.Estrada "observed that Folse had both a knife and a handgun in his possession."PSR ¶ 8, at 5.To help "ease the tension," Estrada offered Folse and the others marijuana and methamphetamine.PSR ¶ 9, at 5.After consuming the methamphetamine, Folse threatened to stab one of the individuals and to hold "everyone in the room at gunpoint for seven hours."3PSR ¶ 9, at 5.Tensions were high, because Murray had challenged Folse to prove that he had not "been with any of the women in the house[.]"PSR ¶ 10, at 5.In response to this challenge, Folse "pulled out his gun and started pistol-whipping one of the females in the home."PSR ¶ 10, at 5.
Folse eventually decided to leave the residence, but, before leaving, Folse ordered Estrada to hand over the keys to his 2002 silver Saturn passenger vehicle.SeePSR ¶ 11, at 5.Estrada complied with Folse's order, fearing that he"had no choice ... based on the continuous threats and acts of violence against him."PSR ¶ 11, at 5.Folse and Murray then exited the house, and ordered Estrada and one of Murray's female friends into the Saturn.SeePSR ¶ 11, at 5.Estrada and the friend "did not feel they had a choice but to go with Folse...."PSR ¶ 11, at 5.
APD received information that Folse had departed the house in a silver Saturn.SeePSR ¶ 12, at 5.Officers soon caught up to the Saturn and attempted to conduct a traffic stop; Folse refused to yield, however, and, during the ensuing flight, threw a semiautomatic pistol from the vehicle.SeePSR ¶ 12, at 5.Folse eventually lost control of the vehicle and "crashed violently, rolling the car onto its roof."PSR ¶ 13, at 6.As APD arrived on the scene, "the vehicle was still spinning and four individuals emerged from the broken windows."PSR ¶ 13, at 6.
Folse and Murray fled on foot.SeePSR ¶ 13, at 6.As they entered a residential street, they came upon a 2008Kia Sorrento sitting in a driveway with the engine running.SeePSR ¶ 14, at 6.Folse opened the driver-side door and told Michael B., a juvenile sitting in the passenger seat, that he had "three seconds to get out."PSR ¶ 14, at 6.Michael B. complied with Folse's order, but as Michael B. was exiting the car, Folse backed the car out of the driveway and clipped Michael B.'s left shoulder with the open car door.SeePSR ¶ 14, at 6;id.¶ 16, at 6.In an interview and later at trial, Michael B. testified that Folse had a firearm; immediately after the incident, however, he told a 911 operator that Folse did not have a firearm.SeePSR ¶ 14, at 6;id.¶ 16, at 6.
APD officers later located the Kia Sorrento and recognized Folse as the driver.SeePSR ¶ 15, at 6.When the officers attempted another vehicle stop, Folse again failed to yield.SeePSR ¶ 15, at 6."A vehicle pursuit ensued, but was discontinued due to the reckless driving by Folse."PSR ¶ 15, at 6.Folse eventually abandoned the Kia Sorrento on Interstate 40, hopped the freeway retaining wall, and "ran towards a business complex where he was able to get a ride out of the area."PSR ¶ 15, at 6.
The next day, on July 3, 2015, APD located Folse at a Seven–Eleven store in Albuquerque.SeePSR ¶ 17, at 6.When officers attempted to arrest Folse, he fled the scene in a stolen 1999 Ford F–150 truck.4SeePSR ¶ 17, at 6.A vehicle pursuit again ensued, but "officers disengaged from the chase because Folse was putting the public at risk of being harmed."PSR ¶ 17, at 6.Later that day, Isleta Pueblo Police Department officers observed the Ford F–150 truck parked at the Isleta Casino outside Albuquerque.SeePSR ¶ 17, at 6.After reviewing security tapes, officers confirmed that Folse was in the Casino.SeePSR ¶ 17, at 6.When Folse exited Isleta Casino, officers arrested him without incident.SeePSR ¶ 17, at 6.The keys to the stolen F–150 were in his pocket.SeePSR ¶ 17, at 6.
In September 2015, Folse wrote a letter to a friend known as "Creeper," asking him "to do what he could in assuring that [Estrada] would not show up to testify."PSR ¶ 18, at 6."The letter was given to [Estrada] who then gave it to law enforcement."PSR ¶ 18, at 6–7.
On July 14, 2015, a grand jury indicted Folse for: (i) being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1)and924(a)(2)(Count I);(ii) carjacking a silver Saturn, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2119(Count II); and (iii) using, carrying, and brandishing a firearm in relation to and in furtherance of a crime of violence, i.e., carjacking the Saturn, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(Count III).SeeIndictmentat 1–2, filedJuly 14, 2015(Doc. 10)("Indictment").On September 9, 2015, a grand jury returned a Superseding Indictment.SeeSuperseding Indictmentat 1.The Superseding Indictment preserves the original Indictment's three counts and adds two new counts.Count IV charges Folse with carjacking a 2008Kia Sorrento, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2119, seeSuperseding Indictment¶ 4, at 3, and Count V charges Folse with using, carrying, and brandishing a firearm in relation to and in furtherance of a crime of violence, i.e., carjacking the Kia Sorrento, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), seeSuperseding Indictment¶ 5, at 3.Plaintiff United States of America later dismissed Count V, because it obtained evidence that Folse did not use a firearm in the second alleged carjacking.SeeUnited States' Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Count Five of the Superseding Indictment¶¶ 5–9, at 3, filedOctober 1, 2015(Doc. 83).On October 8, 2015, following a three-day trial, a jury convicted Folse on all four remaining counts.SeeVerdictat 1, filedOctober 8, 2015(Doc. 105).
The United States Probation Office("USPO") filed a Presentence Investigation Report on May 10, 2017.PSRat 1.In the PSR, the USPO notes that, with respect to the violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) in CountIII, U.S.S.G. § 2K2.4 provides that the guideline sentence is a minimum seven-year term of imprisonment.SeePSR ¶¶ 25–26, at 7–8.The PSR then groups Counts I and II for guideline calculation purposes pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3D1.2(c).SeePSR ¶ 27, at 8.For these two counts, the PSR calculates an adjusted offense level of 30, including a...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
United States v. Young
...aggravated battery categorically fits within § 4B1.2's elements clause.'" Objections II at 8(quoting United States v. Folse, 301 F. Supp. 3d 1037, 1066 (D.N.M. 2017)(Browning, J.)). Next, the United States addresses Young's May 4, 2009, convictions in Tulsa, Oklahoma. See Response II at 9. ......
-
United States v. Folse, CR 15-2485 JB
..."intimidation" in the carjacking statute necessarily means the threatened use of violent physical force).See United States v. Folse, MOO at 38-40, 301 F. Supp. 3d 1037, 1064-65 (alterations to citations ...
- Folse v. United States
- United States v. Folse