United States v. Foote

Docket Number13-7841
Decision Date27 April 2015

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
681 cases
  • United States v. Link, Case No. 1:14–cr–76
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Virginia
    • October 11, 2016
    ...2255"by its terms ... does not allow for a court's consideration and correction of every alleged sentencing error." United States v. Foote , 784 F.3d 931, 936 (4th Cir. 2015). Instead, the statute "provides four avenues by which a petitioner can seek relief":[1] that the sentence was impose......
  • Kovari v. Brevard Extraditions, LLC
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Virginia
    • May 18, 2020
    ...or certainly correct." United States v. Moreland, 437 F.3d 424, 431 (4th Cir. 2006), overruled on other grounds, U.S. v. Foote, 784 F.3d 931 (4th Cir. 2015).A. DR. SUSI VASSALLO In challenging the admissibility of Dr. Vassallo's testimony in this case, Brevard raises several objections: (1)......
  • United States v. Ramirez
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts
    • May 24, 2016
    ...raised via Section 2255 motions. Gov't.'s Opp'n 14; seeSun Bearv. United States, 644 F.3d 700, 705 (8th Cir.2011) ; United Statesv. Foote, 784 F.3d 931, 939 (4th Cir.2015) (collecting cases and concluding that there is no longer any Circuit decision "whereby a challenge to one's change in c......
  • Barnes v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of North Carolina
    • December 27, 2021
    ...10; [D.E. 168] 46–49. Barnes, however, cannot use section 2255 to attack his advisory guideline range. See, e.g., United States v. Foote, 784 F.3d 931, 935–36 (4th Cir. 2015) ; United States v. Pregent, 190 F.3d 279, 283–84 (4th Cir. 1999) ("Barring extraordinary circumstances ... an error ......
  • Get Started for Free