United States v. Freed

Decision Date23 April 1910
Citation179 F. 236
PartiesUNITED STATES v. FREED. SAME v. HELLER. SAME v. GERCHIKOFF.
CourtU.S. District Court — Southern District of New York

Henry Wise, for the United States.

Samuel Markewich, for defendant Freed.

L. B Treadwell, for defendants Heller and Gerchikoff.

HAND District Judge.

This being upon demurrer and motion to quash, I may consider only the indictment. The allegation is that a petition was filed against 'a corporation created by and existing under the laws of the state of New York, ' whose name is stated to have been 'Suffolk Boarding & Livery Stable.' There is no judicial presumption that the corporate name of a corporation denotes what is the presumption in which it is 'engaged principally.' Bankr. Act July 1, 1898, c 541, Sec. 4b, 30 Stat. 547 (U.S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3423). For aught that appears, the corporation may have been engaged principally in selling horses, and have done a livery stable business as a mere incident. Such a possibility is not even unlikely in fact.

Thus nothing contradicts the jurisdiction of the District Court. On the other hand, there is no necessity, in order to show the jurisdiction of the District Court, that the record should negative the exceptions of the statute, alleging that the corporation was in fact engaged principally in one of the occupations mentioned in section 4b. It was enough that the District Court, being a court of limited, but not inferior jurisdiction, was there concerned 'to adjudicate persons bankrupts.' Section 2, subd. 1. That gave it jurisdiction, which cannot be attacked collaterally. Edelstein v. U.S., 149 F. 636, 79 C.C.A. 328, 9 L.R.A. (N.S.) 236.

It is not necessary, therefore, to decide upon the point of the jurisdiction of the District Court in case it should on the trial appear that the petition in bankruptcy actually alleged that the corporation was principally engaged in keeping a livery stable.

As to the failure to allege the actual facts, and not merely that the defendants' testimony in the perjury indictments was false, and that they believed it to be false, there is doubtless authority for the rule which would make the indictments invalid. The practice in this district has been the other way, and on principle it is clear enough that the practice is right, for the requirement is of the allegation of evidence. If the practice is to be changed, the Circuit Court of Appeals must change it.

The other points...

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • Walker v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • 29 Agosto 1935
    ...F. 17 (C. C. A. 9); Stetson v. United States, 257 F. 689 (C. C. A. 6); Breitmayer v. United States, 249 F. 929 (C. C. A. 6); United States v. Freed, 179 F. 236 (C. C.); Manning v. United States, 275 F. 29 (C. C. A. 8); Davis v. United States, 274 F. 928 (C. C. A. 9); Hockett v. United State......
  • Barron v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • 7 Mayo 1925
    ...Cohen v. United States, 157 F. 651, 85 C. C. A. 113; United States v. Young & Holland Co. et al. (C. C.) 170 F. 110; United States v. Freed (C. C.) 179 F. 236; Roukous et al. v. United States, 195 F. 353, 115 C. C. A. 255; Conetto v. United States, 251 F. 42, 163 C. C. A. 292; Frankfurt v. ......
  • United States v. Greenbaum
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Michigan
    • 16 Mayo 1918
    ... ... violation of such statute need not negative the exception ... United States v. Cook, 17 Wall. (84 U.S.) 168, 21 ... L.Ed. 538; Stokes v. United States, 157 U.S. 187, 15 ... Sup.Ct. 617, 39 L.Ed. 667; United States v. Stone ... (D.C.) 135 F. 392; United States v. Freed ... (C.C.) 179 F. 236. As was pointed out in United States ... v. Cook, supra: ... 'Such ... an offense must be accurately and clearly described, and if ... the exception is so incorporated with the clause describing ... the offense that it becomes in fact a part of the ... ...
  • In re Williams Supply Co., 439.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • 10 Junio 1935
    ...In re First National Bank, 152 F. 64, 70, 11 Ann. Cas. 355 (C. C. A. 8); In re N. Y. Tunnel Co., 166 F. 284 (C. C. A. 2); U. S. v. Freed, 179 F. 236 (C. C. S. D. N. Y.). To be sure, a referee, though he may exercise the powers of a District Court, is not the District Court; neither McDonald......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT