United States v. Freeman, No. 233

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
Writing for the CourtFRIENDLY and HAYS, Circuit , and DOOLING
Citation358 F.2d 459
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Robert Sinclair FREEMAN, Appellant.
Docket NumberDocket 29826.,No. 233
Decision Date07 April 1966
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
48 cases
  • State v. Fariello
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New Jersey)
    • November 10, 1976
    ...State, 256 Ark. 19, 505 S.W.2d 204, 206 (1974); People v. Brethauer, 174 Colo. 29, 482 P.2d 369, 374 (1971). Cf. United States v. Freeman, 358 F.2d 459, [366 A.2d 1318] 462 (2d Cir.), Cert. den., 385 U.S. 882, 87 S.Ct. 168, 17 L.Ed.2d 109 (1966); United States v. Anderson, 453 F.2d 174 (9th......
  • People v. Sloan, No. 100580
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Michigan
    • August 22, 1995
    ...369 F.2d 799 (C.A.3, 1966), Rosencranz v. United States, 356 F.2d 310 (C.A.1, 1966), and [450 Mich. 181] United States v. Freeman, 358 F.2d 459 (C.A.2, 1966). Our approach to sworn, yet unrecorded, testimony in connection with search warrants finds further support in the amended post-1972 v......
  • Theodor v. Superior Court, Orange County
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • November 23, 1971
    ...States v. Suarez, 2 Cir., 380 F.2d 713 (same); United States v. Bozza, 2 Cir., 365 F.2d 206 (same); United States v. Freeman, 2 Cir., 358 F.2d 459 (dictum), cert. den. 385 U.S. 882, 87 S.Ct. 168, 17 L.Ed.2d 109; United States v. Bowling, 6 Cir., 351 F.2d 236 (assuming, but not deciding), ce......
  • Theodor v. Superior Court
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (California)
    • September 28, 1972
    ...in greater depth have concluded that the proper standard is one of reasonableness. For example, in United States v. Freeman (2d Cir. 1966) 358 F.2d 459, 463, fn. 4, the court stated: 'A defendant may be able to challenge the veracity of recitals of 'previous reliability' by a motion to supp......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT