United States v. Goldenberg
| Citation | 42 L.Ed. 394,168 U.S. 95,18 S.Ct. 3 |
| Decision Date | 25 October 1897 |
| Docket Number | No. 35,35 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES v. GOLDENBERG et al |
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
The fourteenth section of the act of congress approved June 10, 1890 (26 Stat. 131 137), is as follows:
Upon this section, after stating the facts of this case showing its pertinency, the circuit court of appeals of the Second circuit has certified to us the following question:
'Was the payment of the full amount of the duties ascertained to be due upon the liquidation of the entry of the merchandise required to be made by the importers, as well as the giving notice of dissatisfaction or protest, within ten days after the liquidation of such duties, where the goods, as in the present case, were entered for consumption, in order to enable the protesting importers to have the exaction and classification reviewed by the board of general appraisers and by the courts?'
The...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
City of Greenwood v. Humphrey & Co., Inc
...... City of Greenwood under the jurisdictional and removal. statutes of the United States was a citizen of Mississippi. . . 1. Hughes Federal Practice, sec. 302, pages ...9,. 11, 13; Henderson v. Blair, 102 Miss. 640, 59 So. 859; U. S. v. Goldenberg, 168 U.S. 95, 42 L.Ed. 394;. 18 S.Ct. 3; Green v. Weller, 32 Miss. 650;. Lemonius v. Mayer, ......
-
U.S. v. Libby
...construction is that the intent of the lawmaker is to be found in the language that he has used." United States v. Goldenberg, 168 U.S. 95, 102-03, 18 S.Ct. 3, 42 L.Ed. 394 (1897). Where. the statute's language is plain, and clearly evinces the intent of Congress, "the sole function of the ......
-
United States v. Oregon & C.R. Co.
...... plainly, clearly, and distinctly the sense of the framers of. the instrument, there is no occasion to resort to other means. of interpretation. It is not allowable to interpret what has. no need of interpretation.'. . . And so. in United States v. Goldenberg, 168 U.S. 95, 102, 18. Sup.Ct. 3, 4 (42 L.Ed. 394), Mr. Justice Brewer says:. . . 'The. primary and general rule of statutory construction is that. the intent of the lawmaker is to be found in the language. that he has used. He is presumed to know the meaning of words. and the ......
-
U.S. v. Union Elec. Co.
...in a statute what it says there." Id. (citing Ron Pair, 489 U.S. at 241-242, 109 S.Ct. at 1030-31; United States v. Goldenberg, 168 U.S. 95, 102-103, 18 S.Ct. 3, 4, 42 L.Ed. 394 (1897); Oneale v. Thornton, 10 U.S. (6 Cranch) 53, 68, 3 L.Ed. 150...
-
Aia Proceedings: a Prescription for Accelerating the Availability of Generic Drugs
...construction, is to read the text itself.").172. Bates v. United States, 522 U.S. 23, 29 (1997); see also United States v. Goldenberg, 168 U.S. 95, 103 (1897) ("No mere omission . . . which it may seem wise to have specifically provided for, justif[ies] any judicial addition to the language......