United States v. Gorman, 30068.
| Decision Date | 01 September 1970 |
| Docket Number | No. 30068.,30068. |
| Citation | 431 F.2d 632 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John D. GORMAN, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Ross T. Scaccia, New Orleans, La. (court-appointed), for defendant-appellant.
Gerald J. Gallinghouse, U. S. Atty., Robert L. Livingston, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., New Orleans, La., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG and DYER, Circuit Judges.
This appeal is from the District Court's denial of Gorman's motion to correct or reduce sentence, pursuant to Rule 35, F. R.Crim.P.
On January 31, 1969, more than ten months after he was sentenced, Gorman first requested the court below to modify his sentence. Since Gorman's motion was not filed within 120 days of his sentence, as required by Rule 35, the District Court lacked jurisdiction to consider the motion; and therefore this Court has no jurisdiction over the appeal. Rule 45(b), F.R.Crim.P.; United States v. Ellenbogen, 2 Cir. 1968, 390 F.2d 537, cert. denied 1968, 393 U.S. 918, 89 S.Ct. 241, 21 L.Ed.2d 206.
Appeal dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
United States v. Hamilton
...Peterson v. United States, 432 F.2d 545 (8th Cir. 1970); United States v. Granville, 456 F.2d 1073 (5th Cir. 1972); United States v. Gorman, 431 F.2d 632 (5th Cir. 1970). In addition, the time limits within which a motion may be filed under Rule 35 cannot be enlarged or extended for any rea......
-
State v. Robinson
...over the subject matter and cannot entertain the application. United States v. Robinson, 457 F.2d 1319 (3 Cir. 1972); United States v. Gorman, 431 F.2d 632 (5 Cir. 1970); United States v. Ellenbogen, 390 F.2d 537 (2 Cir. 1968), Cert. den. 393 U.S. 918, 89 S.Ct. 241, 21 L.Ed.2d 206 Read lite......
-
State v. Robinson
...over the subject matter and cannot entertain the application. United States v. Robinson, 457 F.2d 1319 (3 Cir. 1972); United States v. Gorman, 431 F.2d 632 (5 Cir. 1970); United States v. Ellenbogen, 390 F.2d 537 (2 Cir. 1968), Cert. den. 393 U.S. 918, 89 S.Ct. 241, 21 L.Ed.2d 206 (1968). (......
-
Banks v. United States, EC 73-53-K.
...120 days after imposition of sentence,2 the court was without jurisdiction to consider the motion to reduce sentence. United States v. Gorman, 431 F.2d 632 (5 Cir. 1970). By his present petition, Banks contends that he does not seek a Rule 35 reduction in sentence, but rather a modification......