United States v. Greenstein

Decision Date28 January 1946
Docket NumberNo. 170.,170.
Citation153 F.2d 550
PartiesUNITED STATES v. GREENSTEIN.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit

Jacob Friedman, of New York City, for appellant.

Mario Pittoni and T. Vincent Quinn, U. S. Atty., both of Brooklyn, N. Y. (Vine H. Smith, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel), for appellee.

Before L. HAND, CLARK, and FRANK, Circuit Judges.

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

Greenstein, a bankrupt, appeals from a conviction upon two indictments; one, for making a false oath in bankruptcy; the other, for concealing assets from his trustee. He raises three points: (1) That the evidence did not support the verdict; (2) that the court had no jurisdiction over the indictment for concealing assets; (3) that the judge refused to strike out the testimony of a witness for the prosecution because of its uncertainty and vagueness. The facts were as follows. Greenstein filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy in Brooklyn on November 12, 1940, in which he declared in his schedules, and in his "Statement of Affairs" that he had no assets, but liabilities of over $22,000. Upon his examination he denied that he was the owner of two hat businesses; the Alba Hat Company, Inc., and the Emerald Hat Co., Inc., both of which did business in Manhattan. We shall confine our discussion to the first of these businesses, for the evidence as to it alone amply sustained the verdict.

The Alba Hat Company, Inc., was a corporation organized on August 30, 1939, as successor to an earlier hat business on the same premises, known as the Alba Hat Company. On February 15, 1938, one Harold Greenstein, a son of the accused, then about 21 years old, had filed in the N. Y. County Clerk's Office a certificate that he was doing business under that name; but the certificate was endorsed, "filed by Harry Greenstein." In August of 1939, Greenstein approached a factor of accounts, named Luft, and asked him for a loan for the Alba Hat Company. Luft lent him $400; but when Greenstein called again a few weeks later for another loan, Luft told him that the business must be incorporated (apparently to avoid the usury laws). After that had been done Luft made two more loans, both through Greenstein with whom alone he had dealing at any time. At the first interview Greenstein said that the business was his, but that he was conducting it in another name. In November, 1939, Greenstein signed a lease of the premises on which the business was being conducted; in April, 1940, he told one, Cohen, that he owned the business; and in June of that year he said to an insurance adjuster that he owned the business, but he was conducting it in his son's name because he had been in bankruptcy. To an accountant, named Fahr, either Stanley Greenstein or the accused — both being present — said that the corporation was taking over a business which had been carried on either by Greenstein, or by Greenstein with his two sons. The company had a capital of $7,000; but the only certificate ever issued was dated August 26, 1939, and was made out in the name of a single shareholder, Greenstein's daughter-in-law. The manager of the company which had sold the stockbook testified that it had not been purchased until November 16, 1940, over fourteen months after the certificate bore date, and even a few days after the petition in bankruptcy had been filed. Finally, Greenstein upon several...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • United States v. Costello
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • April 5, 1955
    ...F.2d 503, 504, 505; United States v. Cohen, 2 Cir., 145 F.2d 82, 86; United States v. Picarelli, 2 Cir., 148 F.2d 997; United States v. Greenstein, 2 Cir., 153 F.2d 550; United States v. Spagnuolo, 2 Cir., 168 F.2d 768, 770; United States v. Sherman, 2 Cir., 171 F.2d 619, 621; United States......
  • Arnstein v. Porter
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • February 11, 1946
    ...Even if it turned out that in part plaintiff falsified, that fact would not necessarily discredit his entire testimony, United States v. Greenstein, 2 Cir., 153 F.2d 550; Shecil v. United States, 7 Cir., 226 F. 184, 7 See, e.g., Wigmore, Evidence, 2d Ed., 1936, § 1367; Moore, Facts (1898), ......
  • United States v. Leitner
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • February 27, 1962
    ...United States v. Spagnuolo, 168 F.2d 768, 770 (2 Cir. 1948), cert. den. 335 U.S. 824, 69 S.Ct. 48, 93 L.Ed. 378; United States v. Greenstein, 153 F.2d 550 (2 Cir. 1946); United States v. Picarelli, 148 F.2d 997 (2 Cir. 1945), cert. den. 326 U.S. 722, 66 S.Ct. 27, 90 L.Ed. 427; United States......
  • U.S. v. Brimberry
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • December 13, 1985
    ...States v. Martin, 408 F.2d 949, 952-53 (7th Cir.1969); United States v. Gordon, 379 F.2d 788, 791 (2d Cir.1967); United States v. Greenstein, 153 F.2d 550, 551 (2d Cir.1946), and the above quoted excerpt has been quoted with apparent approval by this court. Coghlan v. United States, 147 F.2......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT