United States v. Hall, No. 544

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
Writing for the CourtMOORE and FRIENDLY, Circuit , and WEINFELD
Citation348 F.2d 837
Decision Date14 July 1965
Docket NumberNo. 544,Docket 29196.
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Dennis Richard HALL, Appellant.

348 F.2d 837 (1965)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Dennis Richard HALL, Appellant.

No. 544, Docket 29196.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued June 22, 1965.

Decided July 14, 1965.

Certiorari Denied November 8, 1965.


348 F.2d 838

Louis A. Craco, New York City (Anthony F. Marra, The Legal Aid Society, New York City; Michael G. Marks, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Otto G. Obermaier, New York City (Robert M. Morgenthau, U. S. Atty. for Southern District of New York, Andrew T. McEvoy, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., of counsel), for appellee.

Before MOORE and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges, and WEINFELD, District Judge.*

Certiorari Denied November 8, 1965. See 86 S.Ct. 250.

FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Dennis Richard Hall and one Gilbert Mellay were indicted in the Southern District of New York on three counts for transporting in interstate commerce securities known to have been stolen, converted or taken by fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2314 and on a fourth count for conspiring to commit

348 F.2d 839
these offenses, 18 U.S.C. § 371. Mellay's case having been severed, Hall was tried before Judge Croake and a jury. He was found guilty on all counts and was sentenced to seven years imprisonment on the first three and five years on the fourth, the sentences to run concurrently. The evidence overwhelmingly justified the verdict; the points asserted on appeal concern the admission of statements and physical evidence allegedly resulting from unlawful arrest, unlawful detention and unlawful search and seizure.1 We affirm

The evidence demonstrated a bizarre fraud perpetrated by Hall and Mellay on an elderly lady of means. She was greatly interested in the World Calendar movement, which aims to promote peace by establishing a standardized calendar throughout the world. Using the name of George Jordan, Hall introduced himself to her in February, 1962, as the son of a professor at the American University in Beirut, Lebanon, who had come to express his father's thanks for her support of the movement. In March he sought and obtained $10,000 from her, allegedly for use in freeing a disciple of the movement imprisoned in Czechoslovakia. Shortly thereafter Mellay, posing as an art teacher interested in the movement, invited the lady to what proved to be an expensive dinner — for her — at the Tavern on the Green in Central Park. During the dinner Hall alias Jordan approached the table; the lady introduced him to Mellay. Hall expounded on the need for $200,000 to establish an organization for the promotion of the world calendar in the Near East. Mellay generously responded that he would provide half that sum if the lady would make a matching gift. After several telephone calls from Hall and Mellay, she withdrew $100,000 in State of Michigan bearer bonds from her account at the United States Trust Company on March 30, 1962, and delivered them to Hall at La Guardia Airport. Subsequent efforts on her part to communicate with Hall having proved unavailing, her lawyer made a complaint to the New York office of the F.B.I.

After interviewing the victim of the fraud, Agent Nehrbass requested the F.B.I.'s Detroit office to inquire whether the Treasurer of Michigan knew of any recent transactions respecting the missing bonds. His diligence brought speedy fruits. On May 7 he was advised that in early April the Treasurer had registered $50,000 of the stolen bonds in the name of Joseph F. Lazzara of Spring Valley, N. Y., who had himself presented certain of them in Lansing and whose description tallied with that of Hall-Jordan, and at Lazzara's request had forwarded certain of the registered bonds to the Rockland National Bank in Spring Valley.

The F.B.I. acted promptly on the information thus obtained. Inquiry at the Rockland National Bank on the morning of May 8 disclosed that a Joseph F. Lazzara, whose description tallied with the victim's recollection of Hall, had sought to obtain a loan on the security of Michigan bonds in bearer form, and that the bank had refused but had referred him to a brokerage house in Spring Valley. Investigation there developed that Lazzara, representing himself as a new resident of Spring Valley, had sought to sell some of the bonds; that, on being informed that proof of ownership would be required, he said the bonds had long been in his family but proof of ownership might be difficult, and that, then or later, the manager had suggested registration. Inquiry at the main office of the brokerage house in New York indicated that Lazzara had also endeavored to sell the bearer bonds through them.

On the same day Agent Nehrbass swore out a complaint charging Hall with violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2314. The complaint did not present any of the damning

348 F.2d 840
evidence the F.B.I. had obtained; it said merely
"The bases for deponent\'s knowledge and for the foregoing charge are, in part, as follows: Investigation in the ordinary course of his duties."

Nehrbass and two other agents arrested Hall about 4 P.M. in his automobile on the Palisades Parkway near Spring Valley and searched his person and the car. Nehrbass testified that he told Hall that the latter did not have to talk to the agents, that anything he told them could be used against him in court, and that he had a right to an attorney. Over "a continuing objection" by Hall's retained trial counsel,2 the agent recounted the following:

En route to the F.B.I. office in New York, to which Hall was being taken to be fingerprinted and photographed, Nehrbass asked where Hall had gotten the bonds he had transported to Michigan. At first Hall refused to tell; about five minutes later, he admitted having received the bonds from the wealthy lady but gave a false story as to their acquaintance. Nehrbass inquired as to the whereabouts of the $50,000 of bonds still unaccounted for; Hall replied that if the lady asked for them back, he would return them. Hall reached the F.B.I. office around 5:15 or 5:30 P.M.; the victim, promptly summoned, arrived around 7 P.M. She asked to have her bonds back and Hall said she would get them. Nehrbass inquired where the remaining bonds were; Hall said that they were secreted in Philadelphia and that he would have to make a number of telephone calls to locate them. Fearing that such calls might lead to disappearance of the bonds, the agent refused. Hall then said that the bonds were hidden in his garage in Spring Valley and that he wanted to tell his wife where the bonds were; Nehrbass declined permission, for the same reason. Hall changed his story again, "They are not in my garage. * * But if you will take me home I will show you where they are." This offer the agents accepted.

Agents Nehrbass and Ryan, along with Hall, reached his home in Spring Valley about 8:30 P.M. He told his wife, "I'm in trouble. I stole some bonds and I want to give them back to the F.B.I." Proceeding to the bedroom, Hall indicated to his wife that the bonds were hidden under some insulation in a crawl space under the roof that could be reached through a hole in the bedroom closet. Mrs. Hall went up through the hole, reached under the insulation, and extracted an envelope containing $50,000 of State of Michigan bonds. Hall sought and received permission to eat and say good-bye to his children; the party returned to the F.B.I. office about 10 or 10:30 P.M. Upon arrival Hall said, "I played the game and I lost and I'm ready to pay"; he asked whether he could plead guilty immediately so as to start on his sentence and said he would waive indictment. A statement was prepared which Hall read and signed about 11:30 P.M.3 He left the F.B.I. office around midnight, was delivered to the Federal House of Detention twenty minutes later, and was brought before a Commissioner around noon on May 9.4

348 F.2d 841

(1) Hall claims that the arrest was unlawful and that, under Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 83 S.Ct. 407, 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963), all evidence resulting from it should have been suppressed. Conceding the invalidity of the arrest warrant, compare Giordenello v. United...

To continue reading

Request your trial
46 practice notes
  • U.S. v. Reed, Nos. 486
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • April 11, 1978
    ...390 U.S. 204, 88 S.Ct. 899, 19 L.Ed.2d 1035 (1968); United States v. Monticallos, 349 F.2d 80 (2d Cir. 1965); United States v. Hall, 348 F.2d 837, 841-42 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 947, 86 S.Ct. 408, 15 L.Ed.2d 355 (1965); United States v. Price, 345 F.2d 256 (2d Cir.), cert. denied,......
  • Ford v. United States, No. 17835
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • August 24, 1965
    ...And see Trupiano v. United States, 334 U.S. at 713, 68 S.Ct. 1229 (dissenting opinion of Chief Justice Vinson); United States v. Hall, 348 F.2d 837 (2d The protection of the Amendment, however, whatever may be thought 352 F.2d 933 to have been its primary thrust, is to be broadly applied. I......
  • Collins v. Beto, No. 21739.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • July 21, 1965
    ...For only if the suspect makes a "considered choice," Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 439, 83 S.Ct. 822, 9 L.Ed.2d 837 (1963), to 348 F.2d 837 forego the aid to which, ex hypothesi, he is then and there entitled does the Sixth Amendment permit his statements to be used against him. Fina......
  • United States v. Drummond, No. 310
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • December 2, 1965
    ...Packer, Policing the Police: Nine Men Are Not Enough, New Republic, Sept. 4, 1965, p. 18. 9 Our recent decision in United States v. Hall, 348 F.2d 837 (2d Cir. 1965), provides an analogue. There, appellant was arrested pursuant to a warrant and brought to F. B. I. headquarters. Eye witnesse......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
46 cases
  • U.S. v. Reed, Nos. 486
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • April 11, 1978
    ...390 U.S. 204, 88 S.Ct. 899, 19 L.Ed.2d 1035 (1968); United States v. Monticallos, 349 F.2d 80 (2d Cir. 1965); United States v. Hall, 348 F.2d 837, 841-42 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 947, 86 S.Ct. 408, 15 L.Ed.2d 355 (1965); United States v. Price, 345 F.2d 256 (2d Cir.), cert. denied,......
  • Ford v. United States, No. 17835
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • August 24, 1965
    ...And see Trupiano v. United States, 334 U.S. at 713, 68 S.Ct. 1229 (dissenting opinion of Chief Justice Vinson); United States v. Hall, 348 F.2d 837 (2d The protection of the Amendment, however, whatever may be thought 352 F.2d 933 to have been its primary thrust, is to be broadly applied. I......
  • Collins v. Beto, No. 21739.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • July 21, 1965
    ...chooses. For only if the suspect makes a "considered choice," Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 439, 83 S.Ct. 822, 9 L.Ed.2d 837 (1963), to 348 F.2d 837 forego the aid to which, ex hypothesi, he is then and there entitled does the Sixth Amendment permit his statements to be used against him. Final......
  • United States v. Drummond, No. 310
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • December 2, 1965
    ...Packer, Policing the Police: Nine Men Are Not Enough, New Republic, Sept. 4, 1965, p. 18. 9 Our recent decision in United States v. Hall, 348 F.2d 837 (2d Cir. 1965), provides an analogue. There, appellant was arrested pursuant to a warrant and brought to F. B. I. headquarters. Eye witnesse......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT