United States v. Hernandez-Estrada, 11–50417.
| Decision Date | 09 September 2013 |
| Docket Number | No. 11–50417.,11–50417. |
| Citation | 729 F.3d 1224 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Salvador HERNANDEZ–ESTRADA, Defendant–Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Victor Pablo White, Adams and Reese LLP, Bruce R. Castetter, U.S. Attorney's Office, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff–Appellee.
Michele Akemi McKenzie, Esquire, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant–Appellant.
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35–3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
United States v. Hernandez-Estrada
...Upon the majority vote of the active, non-recused judges of the court, we agreed to rehear this case en banc. United States v. Hernandez–Estrada, 729 F.3d 1224 (9th Cir.2013). In his appeal, Hernandez challenges only the district court's denial of his motion to dismiss. We review “independe......
-
Pizzuto v. Blades
... ... No. 1299002. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 27, ... ...