United States v. Hernandez, CR 16-0281 JB

Decision Date17 December 2019
Docket NumberNo. CR 16-0281 JB,CR 16-0281 JB
Citation428 F.Supp.3d 775
Parties UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Jorge HERNANDEZ, Defendant.
CourtU.S. District Court — District of New Mexico

John C. Anderson, United States Attorney, Samuel A. Hurtado, Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorney's Office, Albuquerque, New Mexico, Attorneys for the Plaintiff.

John Van Butcher, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defenders' Office, Albuquerque, New Mexico, Attorney for the Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Petition for Revocation of Supervised Release, filed July 9, 2018 (Doc. 47). The Court held an evidentiary revocation hearing on January 29, 2019. See Draft Transcript of Hearing, taken January 29, 2019 ("Tr.").1 The primary issue is whether the Court should revoke Defendant Jorge Hernandez' supervised release, because he violated a condition of his supervised release by committing a federal, state, or local crime by: (i) striking Brianna Angulo; (ii) intentionally setting fire to a kitchen; (iii) taking items without paying for them from a Shell gas station; and (iv) driving rapidly while weaving through traffic and crossing into oncoming traffic while evading police in a manner that caused at least one vehicle accident and nearly caused another accident with a police vehicle. The Court concludes by a preponderance of the evidence that Hernandez drove above the speed limit while weaving through traffic, crossing into oncoming traffic, evading police and nearly crashing into a police vehicle. The Court, thus, concludes by a preponderance of the evidence that Hernandez violated N.M. Stat. Ann. § 30-22-22, Aggravated Assault upon a Peace Officer (Deadly Weapon); N.M. Stat. Ann. § 30-22-1.1, Aggravated Fleeing a Law Enforcement Officer; N.M. Stat. Ann. § 66-8-113, Reckless Driving; and multiple traffic laws, including driving through a red light, traveling on the wrong side of the road, and speeding. The Court concludes that the evidence is insufficient to support determinations that Hernandez: (i) struck Brianna Angulo; (ii) intentionally set fire to a kitchen; (iii) took items without paying for them from a Shell gas station; and (iv) caused an accident. Accordingly, the Court will revoke Hernandez' supervised release.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On November 22, 2016, Hernandez was sentenced to thirty months imprisonment and three years of supervised release, subject to several special conditions. See Clerk's Minutes for Proceedings at 1, filed November 22, 2016 (Doc. 42). The Court entered Final Judgment, filed December 7, 2016 (Doc. 45). While Hernandez was on supervised release, the Court issued an arrest warrant for Hernandez. See Arrest Warrant, filed July 11, 2018 (Doc. 49).

1. Amended Petition for Warrant.

The United States Probation Office ("USPO") filed an Amended Petition for Warrant on September 28, 2018 (Doc. 55)("Amended Petition"). In the Amended Petition, the USPO alleged that Hernandez had violated a condition of his supervised release: "You must not commit another federal, state, or local crime." Amended Petition at 1. The USPO listed the ways in which Hernandez had violated this condition. First, Hernandez was arrested on July 4, 2018, for Battery (Household Member.) See Amended Petition at 1. The Amended Petition alleges that he struck his girlfriend's eye with a closed fist. Second, Hernandez was arrested on July 4, 2018, for Criminal Damage to Property (Household Member; over $1,000). The USPO alleges that Hernandez was "setting a fire on the stove top and was using paper towels and other items" and that the kitchen table was "flipped over and broken." Amended Petition at 2. Third, Hernandez was arrested on July 4, 2018, for Arson ($250 or Less in Damage). The USPO alleges that Hernandez' girlfriend, Brianna Angulo told police she saw smoke at the residence. See Amended Petition at 2. Upon entering the residence, the officers smelled smoke. See Amended Petition at 2. Upon entering the residence's kitchen, the officers saw Hernandez using paper towels and other items to set a fire on top of the stove. See Amended Petition at 2. On a July 9, 2018, telephone call with the USPO, Hernandez said that he started the fire to commit suicide. See Amended Petition 2. The USPO told Hernandez to report to the USPO within an hour, which Hernandez did not do. See Amended Petition at 2.

Next, on July 16, 2018, Hernandez was arrested for Aggravated Assault Upon a Peace Officer (Deadly Weapon). See Amended Petition at 2. The USPO alleges that Rio Rancho police officers responded to a dispatch that stated that a male, Hernandez, had shoplifted items from a Shell gas station. See Amended Petition at 2. One of those officers parked on the side of the road to await the shoplifter, and Hernandez' car nearly crashed into the officer's car. See Amended Petition at 2. Hernandez then fled from the officer and was arrested three days later. See Amended Petition at 2. Next, Hernandez was arrested on July 16, 2018, for Aggravated Fleeing a Law Enforcement Officer on July 13, 2018. See Amended Petition at 2. The USPO alleges that Hernandez fled a police officer while driving at "a high rate of speed, swerving in and out of both lanes of travel crossing the double yellow lines in the roadway." Amended Petition at 2. Next, Hernandez was arrested on July 16, 2018, for Shoplifting (over $250 but not more than $500) on July 13, 2018, at a Shell gas station. See Amended Petition at 2. Next, Hernandez was arrested on July 16, 2018, for Reckless Driving; Leaving the Scene of an Accident; and several traffic violations on July 13, 2018. See Amended Petition at 2.

The USPO advises that, because Hernandez' underlying crime is a Class C felony, the maximum statutory penalty is two years imprisonment and three years supervised release. See Amended Petition at 3. The USPO states that, because Hernandez has a Criminal History Category of VI and committed Grade B violations of his supervised release condition, the revocation range of imprisonment is between twenty-one and twenty-seven months. See Amended Petition at 3.

2. Hearing.

The Court held an evidentiary hearing on January 28, 2019. See Tr. at 1:22 (Butcher). The United States introduced Jacob Hopkins, a Rio Rancho police officer, and stated that Hopkins would be acting "as a case agent of sorts today." See Tr. 2:5-10 (Hurtado). The USPO told the Court that the violations of supervised release at issue did not make revocation mandatory. See Tr. at 5:24-6:2 (Court, Villalobos). Hernandez pled not guilty to all charges. See Tr. 9:5-7 (Butcher). The United States first called Katrina Villalobos, a United States Probation Officer, to testify as a witness. See Tr. 9:22-10:18 (Hurtado, Court, Villalobos). The United States next called Hopkins, who was at the scene of the alleged arson and battery, to testify as a witness. See Tr. 18:14-18:22 (Hurtado, Court, Hopkins). The United States next called Ingram2 , a Rio Rancho Police patrol officer who was at the scene of the alleged reckless driving and shoplifting, to testify as a witness. See Tr. 35:16-37:5 (Hurtado, Court, Ingram). The United States next called Hickerson,3 a Rio Rancho police officer who was at the scene of the alleged reckless driving, aggravated assault of a peace officer, and aggravated fleeing from a peace officer, to testify as a witness. Tr. at 48:21-50:16 (Hurtado, Court, Hickerson). Neither party called any further witnesses. See Tr. at 59:3-8 (Hurtado, Court, Butcher). The Court concluded that Hernandez had "violated supervision," Tr. at 68:11 (Court), and gave a sentence, in accordance with the "guideline range," of twenty-one months imprisonment and twelve months supervised release, Tr. 74:23 (Court). See Tr. 74:17-77:1 (Court).

FINDINGS OF FACT

The Court held an evidentiary hearing on the revocation of supervised release. The Court makes the following findings of fact related to the issues. Rule 12(d) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure requires the Court to state its essential findings on the record when deciding a motion that involves factual issues. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 12(d) ("When factual issues are involved in deciding a motion, the court must state its essential findings on the record."). The findings of fact in this Memorandum Opinion and Order shall serve as the Court's essential findings for rule 12(d) purposes. In making its findings, the Court does not consider any evidence or testimony from the hearing that violates the United States v. Jones test. See United States v. Jones, 818 F.3d 1091, 1099 (10th Cir. 2016).

1. Background.

1. On July 13, 2016, Hernandez entered a plea agreement in which he pled guilty to possessing a firearm as a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). See Plea Agreement, filed July 13, 2016 (Doc. 34).

2. The Court sentenced Hernandez to thirty months imprisonment with three years of supervised release and with the mandatory condition that Hernandez "must not commit another federal, state, or local crime" on supervised release. Judgment in a Criminal Case at 2-3, filed December 7, 2016 (Doc. 45).

2. July 4, 2018, Domestic Events.

3. Hopkins has worked as a police officer with the Rio Rancho Police Department for around four years, and he previously had served as a police officer with the Sandoval County Sheriff's Office for around three years. See Tr. at 18:24-19:4 (Hopkins).

4. Around 3:45 a.m., on July 4, 2018, Hopkins was on duty in the City of Rio Rancho. See Tr. at 19:8-10 (Hopkins, Hurtado).

5. Hopkins received a call about a domestic disturbance at 146 Prado Verde Court, Rio Rancho. See Tr. at 19:12-14 (Hopkins); id. at 20:7-11 (Hopkins).

6. Maria Hernandez, Hernandez' sister, had also been at the residence at the time. See Tr. at 32:20-21 (Hopkins).

7. Angulo's face displayed bruises and swelling on the left side. See Tr. at 22:23-25 (Hopkins); Picture of Angulo at...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • United States v. Jones
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico
    • August 3, 2020
    ...for the Tenth Circuit adopted in United States v. Jones, 818 F.3d 1091, 1098 (10th Cir. 2016). See United States v. Hernandez, 428 F. Supp. 3d 775, 788 (D.N.M. 2019) (Browning, J.)("When applying the balancing test, the Court must weigh the defendant's interest in cross-examining and confro......
  • United States v. Chavez
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico
    • September 1, 2023
    ... ... 1098 (10th Cir. 2016). “When applying the balancing ... test, the Court must weigh the defendant's interest in ... cross-examining and confronting [a] witness with the ... government's good cause for not presenting the ... witness.” United States v. Hernandez, 428 ... F.Supp.3d 775, 788 (D.N.M. 2019)(Browning, J.)(citing ... United States v. Jones, 818 F.3d at 1098) ...           1 ... Chavez' Supervised Release ...          1. On ... March 23, 2016, the Court sentenced Chavez to 84 months ... ...
  • United States v. Calvert-Cata
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico
    • October 26, 2022
    ...428 F.Supp.3d 775 (D.N.M. 2019)(Browning, J.). There, an officer responded to a domestic disturbance in Rio Rancho, New Mexico. See 428 F.Supp.3d at 782. When the officer arrived at the the victim “appeared distressed,” and told the officer that the defendant had assaulted her and attempted......
  • United States v. Hykes
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico
    • December 6, 2022
    ...and confronting [a] witness with the government's good cause for not presenting the witness.” United States v. Hernandez, 428 F.Supp.3d 775, 788 (D.N.M. 2019)(Browning, J.)(citing Jones, 818 F.3d at 1098). 1. The Weekend of November 27, 2021. 1. On November 27, 2021, the Saturday following ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT