United States v. Herrera, 73-1321.
| Decision Date | 03 April 1973 |
| Docket Number | No. 73-1321.,73-1321. |
| Citation | 474 F.2d 1049 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jay HERRERA, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Jay Herrera, pro se.
Anthony J. P. Farris, U.S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before GEWIN, COLEMAN and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.
The United States moves to have the appeal dismissed pursuant to Local Rule 20.1 We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.2
Appellant filed a motion in the district court seeking to obtain a copy of his trial transcript in order to examine it to prepare an attack on his conviction collaterally. The district court denied the motion on grounds that the transcript is not available for a "fishing expedition." This appeal followed.
This Court has consistently held that a federal prisoner is not entitled to obtain copies of court records at the government's expense to search for possible defects merely because he is an indigent. Cowan v. United States, 5th Cir. 1971, 445 F.2d 855; Brown v. United States, 5th Cir. 1971, 438 F.2d 1385; Bennett v. United States, 5th Cir. 1971, 437 F.2d 1210; Skinner v. United States, 5th Cir. 1970, 434 F.2d 1036. Therefore, the appeal is hereby dismissed.
Appeal dismissed
1 If upon the hearing of any interlocutory motion or as a result of a review under Rule 17, it shall appear to the court that the appeal is frivolous and entirely without merit, the appeal will be dismissed without the notice contemplated in Rule 18. See Nevels v. McCall, 5th Cir. 1969, 407 F.2d 390, and United States v. Minor, 5th Cir. 1971, 444 F.2d 521.
2 It is appropriate to dispose of this case summarily. See Groendyke Transport, Inc. v. Davis, 5th Cir. 1969, 406 F.2d 1158.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
United States v. Collom
...United States ex rel. Buford v. Henderson, 524 F.2d 147 (CA2 1975); United States v. Shoaf, 341 F.2d 832 (CA4 1964); United States v. Herrera, 474 F.2d 1049 (CA5 1973); Hoover v. United States, 416 F.2d 431 (CA6 1969); United States ex rel. Nunes v. Nelson, 467 F.2d 1380 (CA9 1972) (habeas ......
-
Bogany v. Stephens
...no constitutional mandate that a habeas petitioner must be provided a free copy of his state habeas trial record."). United States v. Herrera, 474 F.2d 1049 (5th Cir. 1973) ("This Court has consistently held that a federal prisoner is not entitled to obtain copies of court records at the go......
-
Lett v. Davis
...See United States v. MacCollom, 426 U.S. 317 (1976); Bonner v. Henderson, 517 F.2d 135, 136 (5th Cir. 1975); United States v. Herrera, 474 F.2d 1049, 1049-50 (5th Cir. 1973); Smith v. Beto, 472 F.2d 164, 165 (5th Cir. 1973); Colbert v. Beto, 439 F.2d 1130, 1131 (5th Cir. 1971). Accordingly,......
-
Stoune v. United States
...Id. at 4-5 (citing, inter alia, United States v. MacCollom, 426 U.S. 317, 321, 327-28 (1976) (plurality); United States v. Herrera, 474 F.2d 1049, 1049 (5th Cir. 1973)). The Court further observed that Stoune had not been deprived of the ability to fairly present his claims, as evidenced by......