United States v. Hinds County School Board, No. 28030

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM
Citation417 F.2d 852
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HINDS COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD et al., Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No. 4075(J)) Buford A. LEE et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant, v. Milton EVANS, Third-Party Defendant-Appellee, (Civil Action No. 2034(H)) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KEMPER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD et al., Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No. 1373(E)) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTH PIKE COUNTY CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No. 3807(J)) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATCHEZ SPECIAL MUNICIPAL SEPARATE SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No. 1120(W)) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARION COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No. 2178(H)) Joan ANDERSON et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant, v. The CANTON MUNICIPAL SCHOOL DISTRICT et al. and the Madison County School District et al., Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No. 3700(J)) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH PIKE COUNTY CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No. 3984(J)) Beatrice ALEXANDER et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HOLMES COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al., Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No. 3779(J)) Roy Lee HARRIS et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The YAZOO COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al., Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No. 1209(W)) John BARNHARDT et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MERIDIAN SEPARATE SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellees, (Civil Action No. 1300(E)) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NESHOBA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No. 1396(E)) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NOXUBEE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No. 1372(E)) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LAUDERDALE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No. 1367(E)) Dian HUDSON et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant, v. LEAKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD et al., Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No. 3382(J)) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COLUMBIA MUNICIPAL SEPARATE SCHOOL et al., Plaintiff-Appellant, (Civil Action No. 2199(H)) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMITE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No. 3983(J)) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COVINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No. 2148(H)) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LAWRENCE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No. 2216(H)) Jeremiah BLACKWELL, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ISSAQUENA COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al., Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No. 1096(W)) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WILKINSON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No. 1160(W)) Charles KILLINGSWORTH et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The ENTERPRISE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT and Quitman Consolidated School District, Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No. 1302(E)) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LINCOLN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No. 4294(J)) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL SEPARATE SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No. 1368(E)) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FRANKLIN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No. 4256(J))
Docket Number28042.,No. 28030
Decision Date14 January 1970

417 F.2d 852 (1969)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HINDS COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD et al., Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 4075(J))
Buford A. LEE et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant,
v.
Milton EVANS, Third-Party Defendant-Appellee, (Civil Action No. 2034(H))
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
KEMPER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD et al., Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 1373(E))
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
NORTH PIKE COUNTY CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 3807(J))
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
NATCHEZ SPECIAL MUNICIPAL SEPARATE SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 1120(W))
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MARION COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 2178(H))
Joan ANDERSON et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant,
v.
The CANTON MUNICIPAL SCHOOL DISTRICT et al. and the Madison County School District et al., Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 3700(J))
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SOUTH PIKE COUNTY CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 3984(J))
Beatrice ALEXANDER et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
HOLMES COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al., Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 3779(J))
Roy Lee HARRIS et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
The YAZOO COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al., Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 1209(W))
John BARNHARDT et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
MERIDIAN SEPARATE SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellees, (Civil Action No. 1300(E))
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
NESHOBA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 1396(E))
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
NOXUBEE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 1372(E))
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
LAUDERDALE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 1367(E))
Dian HUDSON et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant,
v.
LEAKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD et al., Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 3382(J))
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
COLUMBIA MUNICIPAL SEPARATE SCHOOL et al., Plaintiff-Appellant, (Civil Action No. 2199(H))
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
AMITE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 3983(J))
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
COVINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 2148(H))
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
LAWRENCE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 2216(H))
Jeremiah BLACKWELL, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
ISSAQUENA COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al., Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 1096(W))
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
WILKINSON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 1160(W))
Charles KILLINGSWORTH et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
The ENTERPRISE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT and Quitman Consolidated School District, Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 1302(E))
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
LINCOLN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 4294(J))
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL SEPARATE SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 1368(E))
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
FRANKLIN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 4256(J))

Nos. 28030, 28042.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

July 3, 1969.

Rehearing Denied and Rehearing Denied October 9, 1969.

Certiorari Denied January 14, 1970.


417 F.2d 854

David D. Gregory, Atty., U. S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Robert Hauberg, U. S. Atty., Jackson, Miss., David L. Norman, Deputy Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert T. Moore, Robert A. Murphy, U. S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Rights Div., Washington, D. C., Reuben V. Anderson, Fred L. Banks, Jr., Melvyn Leventhal, Jackson, Miss., Norman Chachkin, Jack Greenberg, Jonathan Shapiro, New York City, for appellant.

Robert C. Cannada, John M. Putnam, Jackson, Miss., M. M. Roberts, James H. C. Thomas, Jr., Howard L. Patterson, Jr., Hattiesburg, Miss., Thomas H. Watkins, Jackson, Miss., L. P. Spinks, Jr., DeKalb, Miss., John Gordon Roach, McComb, Miss., R. Brent Forman, Natchez, Miss., Richard D. Foxworth, Philip Singley, Columbia, Miss., Robert Goza, W. S. Cain, Joe R. Fancher, Jr., Canton, Miss., Aubrey A. Calhoun, Mt. Olive, Miss., Robert S. Reeves, McComb, Miss., Thad Leggett, III, Magnolia, Miss., William B. Compton, Robert B. Deen, Jr., Meridian, Miss., Herman Alford, Laurel G. Weir, Philadelphia, Miss., Ernest L. Brown, Macon, Miss., Harold W. Davidson, Carthage, Miss., Maurice Dantin and Wm. C. Callender, Columbia, Miss., J. D. Gordon, Liberty, Miss., William D. Adams, John K. Keyes, Collins, Miss., Cary C. Bass, Jr., Monticello, Miss., A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. of Miss., Jackson, Miss., Charles Clark, Cox, Dunn & Clark, Reuben Anderson, Jackson, Miss., Herman C. Glazier, Jr., J. Wesley Miller, Rolling Fork, Miss., Richard T. Watson, Woodville, Miss., Henry W. Hobbs, Jr., Brookhaven, Miss., Charles H. Herring, Meadville, Miss., Calvin R. King, Durant, Miss., G. Milton Case, Canton, Miss., Thomas H. Campbell, Jr., Walter R. Bridgforth, John C. Satterfield, Yazoo City, Miss., James S. George, Monticello, Miss., Will S. Wells, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, Miss., J. E. Smith, Carthage, Miss., Helen McDade, DeKalb, Miss., Robert E. Covington, Tally D. Riddell, Quitman, Miss., W. W. Hewitt, Meadville, Miss., for appellees.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge and THORNBERRY and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.

Rehearing Denied and Rehearing En Banc Denied October 9, 1969.

Certiorari Denied January 14, 1970. See 90 S.Ct. 612.

PER CURIAM:

As questions of time present such urgency as we approach the beginning of the new school year September 1969-70, the court requested in advance of argument that the parties submit proposed opinion-orders modeled after some of our recent school desegregation cases. We have drawn freely upon these proposed opinion-orders.

These are twenty-five school desegregation cases in a consolidated appeal from an en banc decision of the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. These cases present a common issue: whether the District Court erred in approving the continued use by these school districts of freedom of choice plans as a method for the disestablishment of the dual school systems.

The plaintiffs' position is that the District Court erred in failing to apply the principles announced in recent decisions of the Supreme Court and of this Court.

These same school districts, along with others, were before this Court last year in Adams v. Mathews, 403 F.2d 181 (5th Cir., 1968). The cases were there remanded with instructions that the district courts determine:

(1) whether the school board\'s existing plan of desegregation is adequate "to convert the dual system to a unitary system
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
66 practice notes
  • Kirksey v. Board of Sup'rs of Hinds County, Miss., No. 75-2212
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • May 31, 1977
    ...430 F.2d 368 (5th Cir. 1970); 432 F.2d 927 (5th Cir. 1970), and United States v. Hinds County School Board, 402 F.2d 926 (5th Cir. 1968); 417 F.2d 852 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1032, 90 S.Ct. 612, 24 L.Ed.2d 531 (1969); 423 F.2d 1264 (5th Cir. (Footnote omitted.) GEE, Circuit ......
  • Wells v. Hutchinson, No. TY-75-69-CA.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. United States District Court of Eastern District Texas
    • August 25, 1980
    ...As the Fifth Circuit has noted, "nothing is so emphatic as a zero ...." United States v. Hinds County School Board, 417 F.2d 852, 858 (5th Cir. 1969).21 Nevertheless, there are six other factors which demonstrate that plaintiff was the victim of intentional racial discrimination. ......
  • FEDOROV v. U.S., No. 88-240
    • United States
    • District of Columbia Court of Appeals of Columbia District
    • December 4, 1991
    ...371 U.S. 37, 83 S.Ct. 145, 9 L.Ed.2d 112 (1962)). "[N]othing is as emphatic as zero." United States v. Hinds County School Bd., 417 F.2d 852, 858 (5th Cir. 1969) (per curiam), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1032, 90 S.Ct. 612, 24 L.Ed.2d 531 19. Political demonstrators or protestors can b......
  • United States v. State of Missouri, No. 71 C 555(1).
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Missouri
    • August 27, 1973
    ...5 L.Ed.2d 110 (1960); State of Alabama v. United States, 304 F.2d 583, 584 (5th Cir. 1962); United States v. Hinds County School Board, 417 F.2d 852, 858 (5th Cir. 1969); Cf. Avery v. Georgia, 345 U.S. 559, 73 S.Ct. 891, 97 L.Ed. 1244 (1953). Given the above evidence of a racial classificat......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
66 cases
  • Bossier Parish School Bd. v. Reno, Civ. A. No. 94-1495 (LHS (USCA)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • November 2, 1995
    ...L.Ed.2d 1012 (1982). As one federal court of appeals noted, "nothing is as emphatic as zero." United States v. Hinds County School Board, 417 F.2d 852, 858 (5th Cir.1969). The fact is, the Board's plan presents the black minority of Bossier Parish with no realistic opportunity to elect any ......
  • Morgan v. Kerrigan, s. 75--1184
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (1st Circuit)
    • January 14, 1976
    ...1970); United States v. Board of Education of Baldwin County, 423 F.2d 1013 (5th Cir. 1970); United States v. Hinds County School Board, 417 F.2d 852 (5th Cir. 1969); United States v. Jefferson County Board of Education, 417 F.2d 834 (5th Cir. 1969); Hall v. St. Helena Parish School Board, ......
  • Carr v. Montgomery County Board of Education, 74-2633
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • April 11, 1975
    ...733, 739; Lee v. Macon County Bd. of Educ. (Marengo), 5 Cir.1972, 465 F.2d 369; United States v. Hinds County School Bd., 5 Cir.1969, 417 F.2d 852, 858, cert. denied, 1970, 396 U.S. 1032, 90 S.Ct. 612, 24 L.Ed.2d 531; Lee v. Macon County Bd. of Educ. (Pickens), M.D.Ala. (3 judge) 1970, 317 ......
  • Harness v. Watson, 19-60632
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • August 24, 2022
    ...federal court decision would direct Mississippi to begin serious desegregation efforts. See, e.g., United States v. Hinds Cnty. Sch. Bd. , 417 F.2d 852, 856 (5th Cir.), supplemented , 423 F.2d 1264 (5th Cir. 1969). In as late as 1969, in the face of criticism from a civil rights commission ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT