United States v. Hollis
| Decision Date | 16 August 1890 |
| Citation | 43 F. 248 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES v. HOLLIS. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit |
At Law.
The defendant being on trial for violating section 5392, Rev. St., (perjury,) was called as a witness in his own behalf. The district attorney objected, producing the record of his conviction for an infamous crime, making him incompetent.
A. Lathrop, U.S. Dist. Atty.
A. Blythe, for defendant.
The act of 16th of March, 1878, (20 St.at Large, 30,) provides that a defendant charged with crime shall, at his own request, but not otherwise, be a competent witness; that is to say, he shall not labor under disability because he is a party in interest, and, notwithstanding this, may testify. But when a party offers himself as a witness in his own behalf he must be treated as any other witness, and is subject to any exception which would apply to any other witness. In other words, the act frees him from a disability. It does not confer on him any peculiar exemption. So when a defendant is put on the stand as a witness his general character for truth may be attacked, and if he, by his conduct, had lost the privilege of testifying in courts of justice by the commission of an infamous crime, this will attach to him, and prevent him from testifying in his own behalf.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Louisville & N. R. Co. v. McClish
... 115 F. 268 LOUISVILLE & N.R. CO. v. McCLISH. No. 975. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. April 8, 1902 ... [115 F. 269] ... Charles ... witnesses. Reagan v. U.S. 157 U.S. 301-305, 15 ... Sup.Ct. 610, 39 L.Ed. 709; U.S. v. Hollis (D.C.) ... 43 F. 248. In general, where no attempt has been made to ... impeach him by evidence ... ...
-
Spurr v. United States
... ... witnesses affords no ground for its admission. 1 Greenl.Ev. § ... 469. In his character as a witness, defendant is not entitled ... to any privilege not extended to other witnesses. Reagan ... v. U.S., 157 U.S. 301, 305, 15 Sup.Ct. 610; U.S. v ... Hollis, 43 F. 248. In general, where no attempt has been ... made to impeach him by evidence of bad character, or of ... contradictory statements, or by the cross-examination, he ... cannot corroborate his testimony or give it weight by ... evidence of his general reputation for truthfulness; nor ... ...
-
In re Christensen
...43 F. 243 In re CHRISTENSEN. United States Circuit Court, N.D. California.September 4, 1890 ... Syllabus ... by the Court ... ...
-
Wolfson v. United States
...and passed upon the question as to how far the statute of 1878 is affected by the common-law rules of evidence is reported in U.S. V. Hollis (D.C.) 43 F. 248. court therein said: 'The act of the 16th of March, 1878, provides that a defendant charged with crime shall at his own request, but ......