United States v. Horn, 3715.

Decision Date19 November 1934
Docket NumberNo. 3715.,3715.
Citation73 F.2d 770
PartiesUNITED STATES v. HORN.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit

George I. Neal, U. S. Atty., of Huntington, W. Va. (Will G. Beardslee, Director, Bureau of War Risk Litigation, and Young M. Smith, Atty., Department of Justice, both of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for the United States.

James Damron, of Huntington, W. Va., for appellee.

Before NORTHCOTT and SOPER, Circuit Judges, and MYERS, District Judge.

NORTHCOTT, Circuit Judge.

Appellee, herein referred to as the plaintiff, brought this action at law against the United States, herein referred to as the defendant, to recover for a total and permanent disability benefit under a war risk insurance policy issued to one Don Austin while in the military service of the United States. Austin enlisted in the army on April 1, 1918, and on April 2d, the day following his enlistment, he applied for and was issued a contract of war risk term insurance. The soldier was examined for discharge on February 11, 1919, at Camp Lee, Va., and was honorably discharged on February 18th, of that year. Austin made no premium payment on his insurance after his discharge, and the contract lapsed on March 1, 1919, unless it had been matured at that time by permanent and total disability.

In April, 1919, Austin, who prior to his enlistment in the army was a boiler maker's helper working for the Norfolk & Western Railway Company, at Williamson, W. Va., resumed his old job and continued working at it until June, 1920, during which time he earned the sum of $1,489.88. He was married in June, 1919.

In February, 1920, insured was treated by a doctor who testified that at that time he found a congested nose and throat, and râles, and made a diagnosis of chronic bronchitis. This doctor further testified that the râles found were of the type that one has with a common cold and did not indicate any disability except possibly a cold. This physician also testified that he knew that Austin was employed at the time and did not advise him to discontinue working. The same doctor examined him again in June, 1920, and made a diagnosis of incipient tuberculosis.

The insured was admitted to the United States public health hospital at Greenville, S. C., in July, 1920, and on his admission at this hospital was found to have active, chronic, pulmonary tuberculosis. He left the hospital at Greenville within a month without being discharged by the hospital authorities. He was urged to take treatment in March, 1921, July, 1921, August, 1921, and December, 1921, but refused to do so, and died in February, 1923, from pulmonary tuberculosis.

A number of lay witnesses testified that, upon Austin's return from the army, he seemed to be in poor health; that he coughed and had lost weight; other lay witnesses who worked with him after he returned testified that he did his work well and was apparently in good health.

The plaintiff was appointed administratrix of the estate of the deceased veteran.

The sole question necessary to be considered here is whether the plaintiff, upon whom rests the burden of proof in the case, has shown by proper proof that the deceased was totally and permanently disabled on March 1, 1919.

There is no direct proof that the deceased had tuberculosis at the time the policy expired. To hold that he was so afflicted would be, to the highest degree, speculative. The admitted facts in the case...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • North American Acc. Ins. Co. v. Henderson
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • December 13, 1937
    ... ... Life Assur. Society v. Downs, 112 So. 484; U. S. v ... Horn, 73 F.2d 770; Deadrich v. U.S. 74 F.2d ... 619; Prevette v. U.S. 68 F.2d ... ...
  • United States v. Watson, 4538.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • November 6, 1939
    ...in deciding whether a disease is shown to have reached such stage prior to that time as to constitute such disability. United States v. Horn, 4 Cir., 73 F.2d 770, 772; United States v. Lancaster, 4 Cir., 70 F.2d 515, 516. It is not sufficient that insured show that while the policy was in f......
  • McDonald v. United States, 8560.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • January 19, 1938
    ...may completely destroy the probative value which might otherwise attach to its persistence in an active state. Cf. United States v. Horn, 4 Cir., 73 F.2d 770; United States v. Anderson, 4 Cir., 76 F.2d 337; United States v. Walker, 5 Cir., 77 F.2d 415, Deprived then by these considerations ......
  • Robinson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 7386.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • November 19, 1934

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT