United States v. Hoskins
| Docket Number | 16-1010 |
| Decision Date | 24 August 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
19 cases
-
United States v. Coburn
...(3d Cir. 1998). Certain nonresident foreign nationals, for example, are not eligible defendants under the FCPA. See United States v. Hoskins , 902 F.3d 69, 84 (2d Cir. 2018).22 Therefore, the argument runs, the government should be forced to supply a bill of particulars disclosing whether i......
-
United States v. Blaszczak
...to overcome the "technical legal requirements" of the Title 15 fraud provisions. S. Rep. No. 107-146, at 6 ; see United States v. Hoskins , 902 F.3d 69, 81 n.5 (2d Cir. 2018) ("As a general matter, we may consider reliable legislative history where, as here, the statute is susceptible to di......
-
United States v. Perez
...by the text of the statute. See, e.g. , United States v. Garcia Sota , 948 F.3d 356, 360 (D.C. Cir. 2020) ; United States v. Hoskins , 902 F.3d 69, 96 (2d Cir. 2018) ; United States v. Vasquez , 899 F.3d 363, 373 n.6 (5th Cir. 2018). But see United States v. Leija-Sanchez , 602 F.3d 797, 79......
-
United States v. Napout
...of an ancillary offense [such as] ... conspiracy is coterminous with that of the underlying criminal statute.’ " United States v. Hoskins , 902 F.3d 69, 96 (2d Cir. 2018) (quoting United States v. Ali , 718 F.3d 929, 939 (D.C. Cir. 2013) ). Neither the appellants nor the government dispute ......
Get Started for Free
34 firm's commentaries
-
FCPA Digest - Recent Trends and Patterns in the Enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act - January 2019
...jurisdiction have met varied results. In 2012, a state-owned telecommunications company from Costa Rica, the Instituto CostarricenseHoskins has the potential to alter the scope of FCPA prosecutions and alter the investigation process by limiting the number of defendants that are within the ......
-
DOJ and SEC Publish New FCPA Resource Guide
...Corrupt Practices Act (Nov. 14, 2012) (“First Edition”), available at http://www.sec.gov/spotlight/fcpa/fcpa-resource-guide.pdf. [3] 902 F.3d 69 (2d Cir. 2018). [4] 752 F.3d 912 (11th Cir. 2014). [5] No. 15-cr-706 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. July 26, 2017), ECF No. 609. [6] 902 F.3d 69 (2d Cir. 2018). ......
-
DOJ Global Corruption Efforts Beyond the FCPA
...Americas Investigations Review. The whole publication is available at https://globalinvestigationsreview.com/. 1 United States v Hoskins, 902 F.3d 69, 73 (2d Circuit 2018). Those categories are: 'American companies and citizens, and their agents, employees, officers, directors, and sharehol......
-
Fifth Circuit Decides Government Appeal In FCPA And Money Laundering Case
...an accomplice or a co-conspirator for an FCPA crime that he or she is incapable of committing as a principal[.]" United States v. Hoskins, 902 F.3d 69, 76 (2d Cir. 2018) ("Hoskins I"). Notably, the Justice Department's official "Resource Guide to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act" indi......
Get Started for Free
6 books & journal articles
-
Money Laundering
...legally indistinct offenses); United States v. Hoskins, 73 F. Supp. 3d 154, 168 (D. Conn. 2014), overruled in part on other grounds , 902 F.3d 69 (2d Cir. 2018); United States v. James, 415 F. Supp. 2d 132, 160 (E.D.N.Y. 2005) (discussing the evolution of case law since Zvi ). 13. 18 U.S.C.......
-
FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT
...of interstate commerce. 87. See United States v. Hoskins, 123 F. Supp. 3d 316, 319–20 (D. Conn. 2015) aff’d in part, rev’d in part, 902 F.3d 69 (2d Cir. 2018) (explaining the jurisdictional bases for FCPA liability); see also FCPA Resource Guide, supra note 3, at 10–11. 88. 15 U.S.C. § 78dd......
-
Foreign corrupt practices act
...88. Id. § 78dd-3(a), (f)(1). 89. See United States v. Hoskins, 123 F. Supp. 3d 316, 319–20 (D. Conn. 2015), aff’d in part, rev’d in part , 902 F.3d 69 (2d Cir. 2018) (explaining the jurisdictional bases for FCPA liability); FCPA RESOURCE GUIDE, supra note 3, at 10–11. 90. 15 U.S.C. § 78dd-1......
-
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
...85. Id. § 78dd-3(a), (f)(1). 86. See United States v. Hoskins, 123 F. Supp. 3d 316, 319–20 (D. Conn. 2015) aff’d in part, rev’d in part , 902 F.3d 69 (2d Cir. 2018) (explaining the jurisdictional bases for FCPA liability); see also FCPA RESOURCE GUIDE, supra note 3, at 10–11. 922 A MERICAN ......
Get Started for Free