United States v. Howell
Decision Date | 01 January 1884 |
Citation | 20 F. 718 |
Parties | UNITED STATES v. HOWELL. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Western District of Louisiana |
M Elstner, U.S. Dist. Atty., for the United States.
The fact that the dealer C., had on his books an entry or charge against the defendant for a barrel of whisky, and that defendant had a charge on his firm's books against B. for the same barrel, when coming to the knowledge of the revenue agent, was sufficient to cause him to report defendant as wholesale liquor-dealer; but such a finding by the agent makes, at best, but a prima facie case against defendant. The revenue laws, which provide penalties for offenses like the one charged here, are for the purpose of aiding in enforcing the collection of the government licenses and taxes,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Quinn v. Dimond
...in error rely upon U.S. v. Howell, 20 F. 718; U.S. v. Bonham, 31 F. 808; U.S. v. Allen, 38 F. 736; and U.S. v. Vinson, 8 Fed. 507. In U.S. v. Howell, the defendant was a grocer. Upon order of one B., who wrote him a letter requesting him to purchase for B. a barrel of whisky of a certain br......
-
United States v. Giller
...v. Dwyer, 11 Lea, 452; Com. v. Smith, 102 Mass. 144; Com. v. Pomphret, 137 Mass. 564; Piedmont Club v. Com., (Va.) 12 S.E. 963; U.S. v. Howell, 20 F. 718. G. Neal, U.S. Atty., Contra: U.S. v. Wittig, 2 Low. 466; People v. Andrews, 115 N.Y. 427, 22 N.E. 358; People v. Soule, 74 Mich. 250, 41......
-
Oregon & Transcontinental Co. v. Hilmers
...20 F. 717 OREGON & TRANSCONTINENTAL CO. v. HILMERS and others. United States Circuit Court, S.D. New York.June 21, 1884 ... Holmes ... & Adams, for ... ...